Jump to content

User talk:Saccharinesilk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Saccharinesilk!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

November 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Marble House, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. You actually subtracted source material because you disagreed with it. That's against basic policy. Doug Weller talk 15:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello mr weller. if you want a source for the removal of the false claim that the portico of marble house is a porte cochere, which i believe is what you're referring to, i would refer you to this image from wikimedia commons, which shows very clearly that the portico does not extend over the drive, thus making it definitionally not a porte cochere https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Marble_House%2C_William_Kissam_Vanderbilt_house_%28Newport%2C_Rhode_Island%29_LOC_ds.10851.jpg this diagram can be verified as true by observing the photographs of the building here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Exterior_of_the_Marble_House Saccharinesilk (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Saccharinesilk I doubt it. For a definitive answer post to WP:RSN. Doug Weller talk 09:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you doubt what, exactly? again this is information that can be verified by looking at the building. i'll even share a direct link to a photograph that shows it extremely clearly. https://www.alamy.com/newport-rhode-island-nov-29-2020-marble-house-is-a-gilded-age-mansion-with-beaux-arts-style-in-bellevue-avenue-historic-district-in-newport-rho-image396822162.html Saccharinesilk (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Winchester Mystery House. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I was under the impression that information which was self evident would not need to be sourced; "Victorian and Gothic-style" is an oxymoron denoting two time periods that do not overlap, and Victorian in particular does not refer to a style but rather a family of styles sharing chronology, as the Wikipedia article it links to states. By this I think whoever wrote that part of the article originally is trying to say it's Gothic Revival, but that's, and I apologize if this is rudely put but I truly don't know any other way to phrase it, obvious to anyone who has seen a Gothic Revival building, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Gothic_Revival_architecture seen an American Queen Anne style building, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Queen_Anne_style_architecture_in_the_United_States and Has Eyes. Saccharinesilk (talk) 11:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:RSN#Can we use images of a building to describe the form of architecture? Doug Weller talk 12:34, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]