Jump to content

User talk:Sabrina.ok

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Sabrina.ok, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!  !dea4u  11:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sabrina.ok. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Salt Edge Inc., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 22:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Salt Edge Inc. for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salt Edge Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salt Edge Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Thjarkur (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Salt Edge Inc. (December 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sabrina.ok! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GreenFiber for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GreenFiber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenFiber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salt Edge Inc. (January 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Salt Edge Inc. has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Salt Edge Inc.. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Salt Edge Inc. has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Salt Edge Inc.. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Barrie Wiggham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Washington
Tom Hansen (Nebraska politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United State

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Salt Edge Inc. has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Salt Edge Inc.. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 10:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salt Edge Inc. (September 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 07:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Sabrina.ok. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Salt Edge Inc., gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sabrina.ok. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sabrina.ok|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I note that you have sidestepped the question of Conflict of Interest, above. This notice here does not accept being ignored. Please do not ignore it. Doing so is a likely path to having editing privileges removed. Fiddle Faddle 15:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not ignore any comments, I answered all the questions strictly. I repeat once again I am not paid and I have nothing to do with the company in question. I'm a simple editor trying to develop a wikipedia.--Sabrina.ok (talk) 18:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Salt Edge Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grivco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top Gear.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SmartSE (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabrina.ok (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I analyzed those links and they seem to be of poor quality, I did translations and packages from other wiki versions without analyzing each link separately. I am very sorry for such changes and in the future I will be much more attentive to each source. Please be unblocked to contribute to wikipedia construcitv. (p.s if you draw attention I am not a contributor of malice and I have enough changes in the past to prove it). I'm really sorry. Sabrina.ok (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're sock puppet of User:Anisoara Popovici. You recreated the exact same page at Salt Edge Inc., word for word. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.