User talk:Sabra143

Welcome!

Hello, Sabra143, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bavincis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! KH-1 (talk) 09:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bavincis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bavincis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 09:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KH1, Many thanks for your assistance. I will redraft it by following your guidelines! Sabra143 (talk) 17:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 10:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deb, I am a new user. I just found this Brand on internet and wrote Article on it with all the available reliable sources.

I surely follow your guidelines in future! I am redrafting the Article with all the above guidelines. Sabra143 (talk) 18:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bavincis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bavincis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sabra143! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please help me improve my first Article that got deleted, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Avery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Max Avery, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Avery (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Creator also needs to comply with WP:PAID.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Avery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Max Avery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae, You have declined my page, No issues next time I will do more research and submit another article. As I am new Please help me in improving the Next Article. Sabra143 (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft isn't going to be accepted and I've emailed arbcom about your paid editing. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My dear, it is not paid editing, If draft is not accepted no issues, I did not get any Money for this draft. I am retired Women from government job. Sabra143 (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lie and you know it. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I am 56 years old I don't have to lie to you for this page, if you have deleted it no issues. I was requesting you that I am new here so next time I will find some good article on google and submit for your review before publishing it.

That's all I want to say you my dear. Sabra143 (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any proof that it is paid editing or you are being paid by some one to block the new editor? Sabra143 (talk) 11:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you guys give proof before blocking the account or just you guys woke up and start blocking the editors so you can make your own lobby on wikipedia Sabra143 (talk) 11:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sabra143! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you guys give proof before blocking the account or just you guys woke up and start blocking the editors so you can make your own lobby on wikipedia. Sabra143 (talk) 11:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 01:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any proof that this is paid editing? or just you guys have made a lobby to put all the new editors without any reason. You guys are taking taking money for editing and blocking other editors without any proof. Sabra143 (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you guys give proof before blocking the account or just you guys woke up and start blocking the editors so you can make your own lobby on wikipedia Sabra143 (talk) 11:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= if you have any proof Please tell me that it is paid editing. The person who have sent you request for blocking is account is trying to de motivate the new editors so that person PTAXIDICAE is trying to make her or his own lobby on wikipedia Sabra143 (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

I request to all senior Admins to kindly look into the matter so such kind of Monopoly can be stopped on Wikipedia Sabra143 (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the Upwork/Freelancer/whatever ads for pages you've created recently. I'd call that pretty solid proof. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bavincis

Hello, Sabra143. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bavincis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bavincis

Hello, Sabra143. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bavincis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Max Avery

Hello, Sabra143. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Max Avery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Max Avery

Hello, Sabra143. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Max Avery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]