User talk:STLwiki

Welcome!

Hello, STLwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review

Overall, the article is pretty strong! Your writing and organization is clear and concise. I particularly liked the way you used bullet points under the “Benefits” section because it really enhances the readability of the article. The primary way I think the article can be improved is by adding another subsection describing the background of how these courts emerged and what problems/challenges they were trying to rectify. You mention that in the lead, but then there is no follow-up. As a reader, I would also want to know how these courts work more specifically, such as how do the courts enhance defendant accountability? I might also consider adding more definitions/explanations for some of the more specialized words/terms (e.g., safety planning, batterer compliance, types of victim relief, etc.). I also wonder whether there are any sources out there about how survivors themselves feel about domestic violence courts? Do they find them effective? Do they identify other benefits and concerns that advocates, practitioners, and researchers overlook? Overall, I would assess the article’s completeness as moderately-developed. The sections that are included are well-developed, but some things like background are underdeveloped and could benefit readers by providing a more thorough explanation of domestic violence courts. Egw777 (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review

Overall, the article is very strong in length and in content. Compared to the original article, it looks like this author is adding a lot of important details for this topic which is great. I like how this author added to the lead section with some background and a link to an important court case. It may add to the article to talk about other important domestic violence cases that contributed to the creation of domestic violence court. It also may add to the article to talk about other states and their domestic violence courts, as in the original article they only talk about New York. However, it seems like this author has made really strong additions to the concerns section of the article and cited those accordingly. It may be helpful to look for sources that are more recent, but if there haven’t been changes to the domestic violence courts in recent years then this may not be necessary. Super strong article so far, I’m not sure what else should be added or changed. Coconut818 (talk) 19:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Domestic violence court

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Domestic violence court, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:35, 3 May 2023 (UTC)