Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Quite possibly notable, but insufficiently referenced (and all the sources cited are the subject's own works).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kees Hengeveld and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your comment is the same as last time, Since then we have added sources that are reliable to the criteria mentioned on the Wikipedia page on reliable sources. We have also compared our page to other, similar pages already published in Wikipedia, and see no difference. So we are at a loss as how to improve the draft.
Could you perhaps be more specific in your feedback?
Hi, sorry to jump in - I did edit it after the second round of rejection that (I think) you talk about, and the current version is awaiting review (as stated on the top of the page, a bit counterintuitively). I think the current version I made is likely be fine; if you have questions about the edits I made, you're welcome to ask. But status for now is to wait. //Replayful (talk | contribs) 14:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My comments were "the same as last time" – what does that mean; I've only reviewed this draft once?
Don't compare your draft to whatever articles you may find out there (unless, perhaps, they have been rated Good). They may well have their own problems, which you wouldn't want to replicate. In any case, we don't assess drafts by comparing them to existing articles, but rather by reference to the applicable policies and guidelines.
Also, the draft was subsequently reviewed by another reviewer (who declined it on the same basis, I might add), and has since been resubmitted for a third review, so if the issues have been addressed, as you seem to suggest, then this draft might be accepted in the not-too-distant future. I hope it will, because as I said earlier in my comments, I feel that the subject may well be notable.
Hello, SR-UV-77!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kees Hengeveld and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
