User talk:SOUHAIB BELAMRI

Welcome!

Hello, SOUHAIB BELAMRI, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --VViking_TalkEdits 14:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! I'will take care next time. SOUHAIB BELAMRI (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But this is not spam links SOUHAIB BELAMRI (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm ToadetteEdit. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Toadette ^(chat)/_(logs) 14:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chesapeake, Virginia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not promotional link, this is very old and famous website in chesapeake, va area SOUHAIB BELAMRI (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SOUHAIB BELAMRI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this message reaches you in good health. I am writing to appeal the recent block placed on my Wikipedia account due to my inclusion of a link to oaklakeapts.com, a website dedicated to providing information about Chesapeake apartments and offering advice to individuals seeking housing solutions. I want to express my sincere intent and address the situation at hand.

The website in question, oaklakeapts.com, is an established platform that serves as a valuable resource for those searching for housing options in the Chesapeake area. I believed that this link would enhance the quality and relevancy of the Wikipedia article by providing readers with a legitimate and helpful source of information.

I understand and appreciate Wikipedia's vigilance in maintaining the credibility of its content and its strong stance against spam. I assure you that my intent was in no way to engage in spamming or disruptive behavior. In retrospect, I acknowledge that I should have sought community consensus before adding the link, as per Wikipedia's guidelines.

I wholeheartedly apologize for any inconvenience my actions may have caused and for inadvertently violating Wikipedia's external link policy. I have gained a deeper understanding of the importance of adhering to community guidelines and ensuring the trustworthiness of any external sources added to articles.

I kindly request the reconsideration of the block placed on my Wikipedia account. I am committed to respecting and following Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward, and I am open to participating in discussions with fellow community members to determine the most appropriate course of action for the inclusion of the oaklakeapts.com link.

I value the contributions and principles of the Wikipedia community and am eager to learn from this experience. Your feedback and guidance would be invaluable to me as I strive to improve my contributions and adhere to the highest standards of the platform.

Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. I sincerely hope that you will consider lifting the block on my account so that I can continue contributing positively to Wikipedia with a greater awareness of its policies.SOUHAIB BELAMRI (talk) 16:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every spammer thinks their links are valuable. If you're willing to engage in discussion about it instead of just re adding it, that's a start, but you will need to disclose your connection to this website, see WP:COI and WP:PAID and tell us how you will contribute to Wikipedia more broadly. 331dot (talk) 17:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests. If you do so again, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]