User talk:S. E. Stokowski

Welcome!

Hello, S. E. Stokowski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 10:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:S. E. Stokowski/sandbox (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/S. E. Stokowski/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The

Adventure

Hi S. E. Stokowski!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by Chris Troutman (talk) 01:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, S. E. Stokowski! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 10:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:R. C. Hörsch has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:R. C. Hörsch. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 12:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:R. C. Hörsch has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:R. C. Hörsch. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 12:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. C. Horsch (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 16:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! S. E. Stokowski, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 16:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Draft:R. C. Hörsch with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article was rejected because of "copyrighted material" so I removed the two (properly referenced) quotes even though nobody will tell me if, in fact, they were/are the offending material. So I just guessed because nobody will tell me. Also, once corrected, how do I resubmit the page? Thanks! S. E. Stokowski (talk) 02:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

Hello S. E. Stokowski. Information in itself cannot be copyrighted. However, specific wording can be copyrighted, and almost always is, and all contemporary published writing is presumed to be restricted by copyright unless we have indisputable evidence to the contrary. Wikipedia is far stricter about copyright than most websites, because we strive to make free information available for the ages. Fair use allows us to quote from copyrighted sources in a limited way, and my personal rule is that two sentences of colorful language quoted from a copyrighted source is fine, three is borderline, and more than that is risky.

In your case, you have built entire sections of your draft article with lengthy quotes of copyrighted sources. This is unacceptable on Wikipedia. Instead, the large majority of the content should summarize and paraphrase what the sources say about the topic. Original writing in your own words is what we want.

I want to emphasize a few things here. First, I am not judgmental in the slightest about the risque/criminal aspects of the topic. Second, I have not taken the time to read and evaluate the sources in your draft, or to search for new sources. I am very busy with real life work at the moment. Third, I see a number of other problems with how you have written and formatted the article. But these problems are secondary to the main copyright issue here. I will operate, for now, under the assumption that the topic is notable and therefore worthy of a Wikipedia article. Please feel free to ask further questions. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir:

I have no idea who you are or what your relation is to my submission. I am replying here because I can find no other options.

I understand that you are not the right person to help me. PLEASE point me toward someone who may assist.

NOTE:

1. I cannot connect to the chat page because it asks for a "nickname" and I have no idea what that is.

2. The help section seems unresponsive, or, perhaps, I am not addressing it correctly. However, I have no clue as to how to do this.

3. My article has been rejected for "copyrighted content" but no further information is provided.

4. When I make corrections, somebody mysteriously restores the original version.

5. I am told to make changes on my "sandbox" page but it is blank.

I apologize for bothering you.

SES

I

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. C. Hörsch has been accepted

R. C. Hörsch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Helpdesk reply

Hello, S. E. Stokowski. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#02:33:23.2C_4_November_2014_review_of_submission_by_S._E._Stokowski.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Great improvements at R. C. Hörsch

Article is looking a ton better. I've modified the "cleanup" template, removing the issues you've addressed and noting others. Ping me on my Talk page later once you've fixed those, and I'll point out some more issues. With a little outside input this can be made a very strong article about an interesting figure. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I need help concerning references.

1. The "criminal" and "Psychological" and "Birth" sections all rely on official government records, all of which can be accessed on-line. Are they a problem? Such information is paraphrased in other sources but, as such, carries not so much official "weight" which I assume is necessary in BLP citations. Please advise.

2. Not all information is on-line, especially pre-1995 or so. When possible, I have quoted original (paper) sources along with on-line versions of same that happen sometimes to be in the author's blogs. Such authors (Campbell. Coleman, Maes, etc.) are well known and respected. Again, please advise.

3. In general, please point out specific problems for me to address.

Thank you!

SESS. E. Stokowski (talk) 14:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you never received help so I'd like (ten years later) to point out some things. Your use of government records is unallowable because they are primary sources, online or not. That's why this and this were removed. What you're doing is either making original research or synthesizing these sources. Encyclopedias like Wikipedia are tertiary sources, which should only be summarizing secondary sources. We require reliable sources so some dude's blog has to go. Pointing to a subject's published works is the oldest trick in the book for faking notability. Many non-Wikipedians think that the published works make notability, and they don't. A huge issue is WP:BLPCRIME. We need solid sourcing to make claims about a subject's criminal activity, which is why this and this had to go. You either have a conflict of interest regarding this subject or you have a really unhealthy interest, which is why you read like a frustrated writer, coming to Wikipedia out of desperation. Again, I'm sorry this advice comes years too late. As an editor, you have to be savvy enough to utilize our help features because generally no longterm editors are going to watch your talk page to respond to your queries. See WP:NOBODYCARES. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, S. E. Stokowski. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest: R. C. Hörsch

Hello, S. E. Stokowski. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page R. C. Hörsch, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Vegantics (talk) 20:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no relationship or conflict of interest. 173.49.205.227 (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content has been vandalized and removed without cause based on false and unsubstantiated allegations. Please restore. S. E. Stokowski (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]