User talk:Ruutanaonki

This is Ruutanaonki's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: PV Lehtinen (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What makes iMDB reliable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PV Lehtinen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PV Lehtinen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ruutanaonki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wingwatchers (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:PV Lehtinen

Hello Ruutanaonki! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:PV Lehtinen, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0499918/bio, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:PV Lehtinen and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:PV Lehtinen, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:PV Lehtinen. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:PV Lehtinen with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:PV Lehtinen saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! -Ljleppan (talk) 09:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PV Lehtinen (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Batamore was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PV Lehtinen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PV Lehtinen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Batamore (talk) 15:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Diver (2000 short film) (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too much purple prose, e.g. "a dreamlike collage". This is not the place for a review; we only include neutrally-worded articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Diver (2000 short film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Diver (2000 short film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 11:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 11:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Diver (2000 short film) (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:The Diver (2000 short film) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 20:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PV Lehtinen (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

expand on the prose. if we want a list of works, we can peruse imdb.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PV Lehtinen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PV Lehtinen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: PV Lehtinen https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:PV_Lehtinen

Hi Robertsky!

Thanks for your response, but declining the draft has no justification. There are many articles of film directors, which are “stub” but accepted. Of course! The general idea of Wikipedia is that users expand/supplement articles over time. Check the category: “Finnish film directors” https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Finnish_film_directors or

“Swedish film directors” https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Swedish_film_directors.

Here is just few examples of “stub” biographical articles (and this list is endless):

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Harri_J._Rantala

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Laura_Hyppönen

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Petri_Kotwica

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jari_Halonen

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Zaida_Bergroth

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Simo_Halinen

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Tero_Jartti

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Pekka_Karjalainen

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Maarit_Lalli

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jarmo_Lampela

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Perttu_Leppä

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Lauri_Nurkse

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/JP_Siili

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Aleksi_Salmenperä

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Olli_Soinio

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Paul-Anders_Simma

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Pia_Tikka

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Selma_Vilhunen

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hanna_Hemilä

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Matt_Broadley

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hans_Abramson

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Elof_Ahrle

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Morgan_Alling

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Kjell-Åke_Andersson

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mats_Arehn

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ragnar_Arvedson

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Reza_Bagher

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Patrik_Bergner

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Maria_Blom

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bengt_Blomgren

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Per-Axel_Branner

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Åsa_Bjerkerot

These all are “short on prose”. In your opinion, all are also “read like an advertisement”??

Please, could you approve my draft as an article or let someone else make the decision. Thank you in advance. Ruutanaonki (talk) 11:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the same comment above was left on my talk page as well, and I have replied to it on my talk page before checking through Ruuanaonki's contributions to realised that the comment was written here as well (wasn't pinged by the system). – robertsky (talk) 15:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Diver (2000 short film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Diver (2000 short film). Thanks! – robertsky (talk) 07:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Diver (2000 short film) has been accepted

The Diver (2000 short film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PV Lehtinen has been accepted

PV Lehtinen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 08:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]