User talk:Rufus377

April 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Globalism. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 08:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Globalism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 08:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

The editor is using this page to promote a false narrative which looks to be politically motivated. You claimed that I did not source my material, but I did include two sources. The editor has not contacted me about any compromise position on this. It should be rather easy to portray the different usages of this term instead of simply reverting back to the false narrative originally posted. Using exclusively left leaning media in order to promote an agenda in which conservative use of this terminology is anti-Semitic is disingenuous and intellectually dishonest and it completely ignores the fact that this term is used by both the far right and far left for in this manner, but Conservatives use it differently -- as indicated in the the two sources I posted. and

Note that including your reverts as an IP, the next time you do that you will probably be blocked

Doug Weller talk 08:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)