User talk:Rosseauwake

Welcome

Hello, Rosseauwake, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chickyfuzz14^{(user talk)} 19:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from John A. Boockvar. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that - didn't realize I was removing templates! (I'm new here, in case you couldn't tell :). Rosseauwake (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John A. Boockvar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John A. Boockvar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John A. Boockvar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John A. Boockvar

The article John A. Boockvar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON: Web of Science lists 82 publications for "Boockvar JA", which have been cited 449 times for an h-index of 12. Highest citation counts: 57, 43, 40. In this high-citation density field, this is insufficient to show a significant impact on his field. Does not appear to meet any of the criteria of WP:ACADEMIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 06:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John A. Boockvar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John A. Boockvar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John A. Boockvar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. E Eng 21:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]