User talk:RobJ1981/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Level Seven (band)

Please respond to my comments in the talk section of said page.
Thank you, Naylor182 23:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Capitalize

Please capitalize when you rate a film, e.g. "class=Stub" not "class=stub". If it is left lowercase, then it will stay in the unassessed category. Also look at this. This script makes it so that it's just one click to rate a film article. It is highly recommended for clearing this backlog.Supernumerary 04:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the dab tag --BostonMA 18:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Beyond the Wall of Sleep

Thanks for the feedback. It would be even more helpful if you would explain the rating, indicating the particular areas that you think need to be improved to bring the article up to the next level. Nareek 16:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Notice Board

Thanks for adding those items to the WP:CMC notice board. I really appreciate it. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 03:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah Thanks Rob

You are a good editor. I appreciate your work. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 06:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Succession boxes

It had been discussed at WP:PW before. I left Wikipedia without completly removing them before. I suggest asking at WP:PW what they feel now if they want to continue using succession boxes. Personally, I think they are big and bulky and only repeat information we could have in the form of text in articles. Plus, it's also relisted in Championship articles. Suggest asking WP:PW before you revert. — Moe Epsilon 20:14 September 22 '06

Uncat edits

Hi. Re: this edit, I think the general idea of {{uncat}} is to add a category that implies notability. When I see the only cat on a bio is Category:1962 births, I slap an {{uncat}} on it!  :) What do you think? —Wknight94 (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Several users recreating attack/nonsense pages

Yeah, thank you for the headsup. I have deleted several of these articles already, and I guess I'll do something about these guys now. --Nishkid64 00:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay, three users were blocked as a result of the constant re-creation of these unnecessary articles. Also, all three articles were protected in order to prevent any re-creation of these articles. Thanks for all the help. --Nishkid64 00:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:a vandal to keep an eye on

Thank you so much for the notice. I blocked the user indefinitely. For future reference, I just would like to tell you that you can report bad users to WP:AIV and they will be dealt with asap there. --Nishkid64 21:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)