User talk:Ridhumohan

Ridhumohan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ridhumohan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Aon Hewitt

A Wikipedia article, such as Aon Hewitt, should only include information relevant to the subject of the article. If you have a personal grievance against Alight Solutions, a successor firm to Aon Hewitt, take it to the appropriate forum. Wikipedia isn't the right place to air your grievances. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:23, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Edit-Warring

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Aon Hewitt. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forcing out and calling it voluntary resignation makes it difficult

If teen school drop out Alli was angry at you, you would be ably explain it to others if you knew why she was angry. You would be able to convince others that you didn't do anything wrong or at least explain the circumstances which lead to an issue with Alli. Likewise, if Alight appropriately called my exit a termination of employment and showed me a reason for it, I would be able to contest that decision or at least explain my actions in such a way that I get a job somewhere else. It's some employees possibly including a director lying to everyone above him about seemingly unimportant matters. I'm unable to take it to court due to two reasons: one is, the court will be hearing from the same people who are lying. Another one is that I haven't been able to get a steady job since my exit from Alight and as a result, I have little money. Can you please give me Pavan Bhalla's email address? Or the same of any of the directors other than Pawan Chowdhary? Ridhumohan (talk) 02:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm looking for in this helpless situation

I'm looking for a termination letter dated June 21, 2017 or any other date they would please to give, reason for termination explained in detail, and salaries for the months that have elapsed since my exit from Alight. Please help by connecting me with a leader above Pawan Chowdhury. I have been demanding transperancy from the day of my exit one way or the other. I emailed CEO demanding action against the people who threw me out or ₹600000. I realise that I was merely looking for a way to move on. People I had issues with don't want me yo move on. That's why they are doing this. If Alight forced me out, then it owes me a termination letter. Ridhumohan (talk) 02:52, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aon (company) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aon (company) was changed by Ridhumohan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852667 on 2018-10-31T10:09:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I missed just a few words

I missed to say 'he wrote referring to himself in third person' before the words 'Alight Solutions' stooped Ridhumohan (talk) 10:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Mulroney. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brian Mulroney was changed by Ridhumohan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856012 on 2018-10-31T10:57:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 13:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ridhumohan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thought I was merely creating new pages or editing pages that already existed without violating any rules. The ex-employee I was referring to is myself, and I was trying to get some help too because I am broke and do not have enough money to get legal assistance. I have genuine interest in contributing to wiki as I did in my first few edits. Later I thought I found an opportunity to fix a very serious life problem by writing about it on the pages created for concerned people. Now I have decided to find another way to fix my problems. I am genuinely interested in contributing to wiki. I'm sure I will enjoy doing that for many years to come while strictly adhering to the rules and regulations

Decline reason:

We are not a venue for you to pursue your vendetta against a former employer. GAB^gab 15:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2018

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]