User talk:Richardhuff

Welcome!

Hello, Richardhuff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 04:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enka, North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Enka, North Carolina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The Helpful One (Talk) 20:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Feltonville, North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Feltonville, North Carolina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PookeyMaster (talk) 00:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ingleside, North Carolina

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ingleside, North Carolina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ingleside, North Carolina. Cenarium (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Farrington, North Carolina

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Farrington, North Carolina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Old Trap, North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Old Trap, North Carolina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 19:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evergreen, NC

Are you familiar with Columbus County, North Carolina? User:Carlossuarez46‎ and I are very curious how there could be two Evergreens in the county, but neither of us have been to the area. If you know the area, would you be able to help us understand such an odd situation as this? Nyttend (talk) 18:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Luck, North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Luck, North Carolina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is an article about a subject whose existence as a geographical place is questionable. (WP:Hoaxes)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luck, North Carolina and Trust, North Carolina

I removed the speedy tag from Luck, North Carolina. Please take a look at the current version of the article. I looked up the community at GNIS at http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic and added the information that I found there. Please try to add GNIS information in the same format to other articles you create about small communities in North Carolina so that the articles would be more useful. Thank you. --Eastmain (talk) 01:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rocky Ford, North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Rocky Ford, North Carolina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Eastlygod (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Communities in North Carolina

Hi, I notice that you have created several new short articles for unincorporated communities in North Carolina. Please slow down and provide context and references for what you contribute. Some points:

Sytle: Please consider wording like: "Clegg is an unincorporated community in Wake County, North Carolina..."
Please assign categories (if only to give other editors less to clean up). Relevant categories are:
- Category:Unincorporated communities in North Carolina
- If the community is in Wake County, North Carolina. Then add [[Category:Wake County, North Carolina]]
- If the article is just a sentence or two, please add a stub template at the end of the article. In this case, use {{NorthCarolina-geo-stub}}.
Please include coordinates so that others can find the place on a map for verification. You can get coordinates from Google Maps or the USGS Geonames Database.

• Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woodville, Perquimans/Pasquotank County, North Carolina

I just saw your stub for Woodville, Perquimans/Pasquotank County, North Carolina. Use this following page as a model to further develop your article: Lewiston_Woodville, North_Carolina. In the meantime, be sure to add a category and expand it with referenced articles. Kgrr (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard, I put just enough in to keep your article around long enough for you to add-in what you need. I've added the categories and a couple of references. Consider adding a picture of the town, and some more information about it. Enjoy. Kgrr (talk) 21:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard, I moved your Woodville page to Woodville, Perquimans County, North Carolina because it's actually registered under Perquimans County.Kgrr (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Powells Point, North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Powells Point, North Carolina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Daltxn (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of

Please discontinue creating articles which are incomplete and do not contain references. A prior comment on your Talk Page has already addressed this matter. Daltxn (talk) 22:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shotwell, North Carolina

A tag has been placed on Shotwell, North Carolina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 13:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just expanded the Shotwell article to a basic stub. Settlements are notable, but articles about them need enough information for readers to identify them. Always include your sources. Please lookup and add coordinates for the places you add. You can get information at HomeTownLocator. Again, please add categories and a {{NorthCarolina-geo-stub}} tag at the end of new article stubs. Please don't write articles that other editors have to rescue. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced, incomplete articles

Hello. I noticed you have just created another batch of unreferenced, one-sentence articles about places in North Carolina. Please stop. For example, Beaver Creek, North Carolina meets the criteria for speedy deletion since there is not enough information to identify the place. (There are two places named Beaver Creek.) Again, when you create an article, please take a minute to look up its coordinates. When you add content to Wikipedia, always cite sources where you got your information. And again, please stop creating articles that other editors have to rescue. • Gene93k (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Full House

Hi, why are you adding the "current" ages for all the characters from that show? They are fictional characters and their ages should only be stated as they were while they were on the show. For An Angel (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Zoey 101. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -青い(Aoi) (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles or before discussions about the title have ended, as you did to Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Wilderness, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Orlady (talk) 22:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Union Cross, Forsyth County, North Carolina

Hello. The Union Cross, Forsyth County, North Carolina article, which you created, has been merged and redirected to Union Cross, North Carolina. Union Cross, Forsyth County was a duplicate article. Union Cross in Yadkin County appears to be a neighborhood and does not appear to justify disambiguation. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Brenda Vivian

A tag has been placed on Brenda Vivian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Non-dropframe (talk) 22:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

An article of yours is in AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Munck. Joe Chill (talk) 04:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swansons Landing, Texas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swansons Landing, Texas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swansons Landing, Texas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

wizzito | say hello! 01:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]