User talk:For An Angel

Archives

Archive 1

Thanks

Thanks. I didn't see it. It was so teeny, and nestled under the infobox. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Moms

Hi For An Angel--I see you've been active on that article. I think there's a bit too much plugging of websites and adding of fan cruft going on, and if it continues, in the next week or so, I might semi-protect it. I guess I'm writing this note to give you a heads-up; you seem to be a reasonable editor who is aware of Wikipedia's guidelines and the article needs all the help it can get. I am somewhat strict when it comes to our guidelines, I guess: I want to see a clean and well-referenced article, not a vehicle for spam and fan chat. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit: thanks for the oversight--sorry I messed that up. Drmies (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Guess what I'm watching on TV. (I'll give you a hint: two minutes in I'm already sick to my stomach.) Drmies (talk) 02:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
<insert Talkback template here> Drmies (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, For An Angel. You have new messages at Talk:Dance Moms.
Message added 19:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Drmies (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I don't know. Nothing that he writes makes any sense to me. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no problem

Sorry if I blew up a little -- finding that attack was startling. I've done a fairly radical edit on the talk page that I hope will suit you. The Marion Barry event took place at the worst moment in my life -- I apologized profusely but am still embarrassed whenever anybody brings it up, and it seemed completely inappropriate there. I hope we will find ourselves in agreement on other matters soon. Best, Tim. Mitegap (talk • contribs) 22:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on Dance Moms. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I need to have a look at the article to see why it got locked. BTW, I'm watching Maddie. She looks like a shaved monkey with make-up. Why didn't Nia get a spot in the trio? Life's not fair. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh no! She froze! Drmies (talk) 01:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi. I looked at the new image "gallery" format, but I think the images are better used to illustrate the text along the way. Did you have an objection to where the images are now, or were you just proposing a possible alternative? If you feel very strongly about it, we could try to get a few more people to give us opinions about it, but my sense is that the well-regarded performer bio articles do not do this. See Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson, David Bowie and Anna May Wong, for example. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, For An Angel. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
Message added 14:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Drmies (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Moms

Hi, For An Angel. Thanks for weeding out some of the unencyclopedic commentary at Dance Moms. I appreciate you working on the article. I know it can be difficult dealing with a popular subject with a large and enthusiastic fanbase. (That, of course, was the reason the article was protected in the first place.) But I think it is necessary to stub out almost all of the information in the cast section as unsourced BLP info. Cast information should be re-added only with in-line citations to good sources. I'm sorry to diminish the article -- and hope you'll be able to work with it. Cheers. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Angel, I LOVE your edit summary. OMG, I can't believe the drama tonight. All that over an engagement ring?? And did you see what car that woman is driving? that's more than my annual salary. Uh-oh, we're back, and Abby is mad. Later, Drmies (talk) 01:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL Thanks. Melissa is definitely starting to act strange. IMHO, she's confusing the concern that the other moms are showing her with nosiness. Although, I can't help but wonder how much of the show is real and how much is scripted, especially when yet another mom storms out of the studio. Maddie's crying did seem real though :-(. For An Angel (talk) 04:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it did seem real--poor kid. Well, with a mom acting like that, who wouldn't cry. Storms out, while on the phone dictating a letter she will later disavow, leaving one of her children with someone else, sheesh. FWIW, Mrs. Drmies made the same comment you did, about "scripted". I know the moms are the main attraction, but they bore me. Then again, new boobs, that's always nice. We just bought a new car and I love looking at it, just sitting in the driveway--I guess a pair of new boobs must be like that ("reimbursement"). See you next week, Drmies (talk) 04:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, For An Angel. You have new messages at Talk:Chloë Moretz.
Message added 18:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

QuasyBoy (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Dark Waltz"

Since the album Pure is blue linked, I believe that we do not need to further identify it. That is one of the strengths of Wikipedia - the blue-link makes it unnecessary to give all the information in every article that mentions the linked item, even though it would be ambiguous without the link. Westenra didn't write "Dark Waltz", and saying her name in that place in Evancho's album only obscures the point, which is that Evancho sang the song in this broadcast in 2012. I suggest that we either:

Delete the words "by Hayley Westenra" to give the minimum amount of information necessary to identify the song; or
Move all the information about Pure, Westenra and the songwriters into a footnote like this: "Dark Waltz"[fn]

Please let me know. Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll go with a footnote. "Ave Maria" has a Schubert version and a Bach/Gunod version. Jackie has performed both versions at different events. On AGT, for example, she did Gunod. On DWTS, she did Schubert. With Tim Janis, she did Schubert. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trust (2010 film)

Hello. Many thanks for your recent rewrites in respect of the abovementioned film. I have endeavoured, on previous occasions, to make the article flow slightly better. In your edits, you wrote that Annie 'had sex' with Charlie. In your opinion, would the word 'rape' be a better reflection as to what happened? I am not criticising you at all. I am just curious because I have performed work on the article. I was just wondering what your perspective is. Please do not feel motivated to change it, but I just want to give an accurate portrayal of what transpired in the film. Thank you for your wonderful edits. (Galaxycat (talk) 21:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

hello. Thank you so much for the detailed answer that you sent me. I understand your point of view. Unfortunately, I have been quite busy and I will send you a more detailed response soon. (Galaxycat (talk) 12:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. Another user replaced your edits with the word 'rape.' I did not amend the edit, but placed the issue on the Talk page in order to open up the debate to other users. Upon reflecting on the situation, 'having sex' or 'had sex' more accurately depicts the situation as Annie saw it at the time. Part of the importance of the film is that many girls/ young women do not define what happen to them as being rape. The way Annie likely viewed the situation was that she met a gman and he liked her so much that he had sex with her. Under the law, she was raped. Most people would view the act as being one of rape. A prosecuting lawyer would argue that Annie did not consent and that Charlie overpowered her will and procured sex with a minor. I really hope that you will add to the discussion. I am very impressed with your arguments (Galaxycat (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Evancho

This new editor, Gillwill2000, has deleted the clarifying information in the footnote to the Page article three times now (see, e.g. this, near the bottom). I think we need the information warn the reader about Page's longstanding objection to child prodigies that prejudices his article, even though he has not actually bothered to find out about Evancho's upbringing or repertoire. I left a message on the talk page, which Gillwill2000 has attempted to rebut but, IMO, the information is both relevant and necessary. What do you think? -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, For An Angel. You have new messages at Talk:America's Got Talent (season 7).
Message added 07:19, 15 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:19, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maggie Elizabeth Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you wish to contest this, please e-mail arbcom-en-l(at)lists.wikimedia.org.--Scott Mac 16:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dance Moms cast.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dance Moms cast.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kate Voegele - Don't Look Away (alt).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kate Voegele - Don't Look Away (alt).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jackie Evancho singles discography

Someone just created this Template, but as I understand it, only one of her singles was released officially. Or, in any case, does the Template make sense? Should it be combined with her main template? You can see it, for example, at the bottom of Prelude to a Dream. Thanks for any advice or help! -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Clique film.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Clique film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephanie Tanner.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stephanie Tanner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Violet Baudelaire (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Violet Baudelaire (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steven Purugganan

The article Steven Purugganan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stripping out the unsourced information leaves little more than a stats table, and we need more than just stats references to demonstrate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Primefac (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of current child actors from the Canada listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of current child actors from the Canada. Since you had some involvement with the List of current child actors from the Canada redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridge to Terabithia soundtrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridge to Terabithia soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maia Skouris.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maia Skouris.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Book of Stars soundtrack.jpg

The file File:The Book of Stars soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in The Book of Stars#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Big 177.228.111.253 (talk) 12:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Movie 43 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Movie 43 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chrissa Stands Strong.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chrissa Stands Strong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CasperMeetsWendy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CasperMeetsWendy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Molly Walker.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Molly Walker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Punky Brewster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Punky Brewster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Holiday in the Sun.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Holiday in the Sun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Young Nancy Callahan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Young Nancy Callahan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 03:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]