Jump to content

User talk:Rhalldearn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navarik (July 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rhalldearn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navarik (July 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Information icon

Hello Rhalldearn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rhalldearn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rhalldearn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought I did disclose my relationship with the company? I am the CEO. I have a public presence so I am happy for people to know who I am. I can leave the page for other people to edit who have no current involvement in the company. That might help improve the conflict I have on this topic. However, I was aiming just to describe the company and it's history in Vancouver. Rhalldearn (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Navarik has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Navarik. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navarik (July 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 07:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found a guide on conflict of interest and it appears I should not create a page on Navarik and leave it to someone else. Rhalldearn (talk) 16:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]