Jump to content

User talk:Rezaei1374

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Mustafa open university (March 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- Happysailor (Talk) 17:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Rezaei1374! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor (Talk) 17:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Mustafa open university (March 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. David.moreno72 12:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Mustafa open university moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Al-Mustafa open university, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Mustafa open university (April 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 16:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Mustafa open university (April 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Al-Mustafa open university requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=836468790&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmou.ir%2Fen%2Fabout-us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 00:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

Hi, thanks for message. All your edits relate to persistent attempts to create this article, you have written nothing else. You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rezaei1374. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rezaei1374|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

I deleted your article because

  • it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the university, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the university claims or interviewing its management. you gave no references of any kind. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
  1. significant coverage in
  2. independent,
  3. multiple,
  4. reliable,
  5. secondary sources.
Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
  • it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
  • Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: Employing proficient professors and scientific staff... Benefits of studying at Al-Mustafa Open University (followed by list of claimed benefits) and so on, pure spam throughout
  • You also included the address and how to apply, just spamming again
  • it's all about what the university's courses, little about the university itself other than locations. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees and students, funding and expenditure.
  • there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You repeatedly posted copyright violations. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The copied site was marked . We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.

As it happens, I'm going to be away for a week. I suggest that you use that time to write something off-line that complies with our rules and has independent verifiable sources. You can also post your conflict of interest notice.

When I return, I'll temporarily remove protection so that you can post your draft. Please read the following warning very carefully

  • If your next draft is more of the same, I'll block you as an advertising only account
  • If you ignore the COI warning, I'll block you as an undeclared paid editor
  • If you attempt to write about anything connected to the university while I'm away, from this or any other account, I'll block you for that too.

I'm sorry for the harsh tone, but you have so far been unwilling to follow our rules


Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]