User talk:RetiredUser2

CfD nomination of Category:Indian women cricketers

Nomination for deletion of Template:FL

Template:FL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 14:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAR nomination of Simon Byrne

Hi, RetiredUser2, formerly known as ALoan, Cirt has nominated Simon Byrne for the Featured Article Review here. Please join the discussion here whether this article meets the criteria. If the concerns are not addressed, it will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. JJ98 (Talk) 05:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Old Stagers

The article Old Stagers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Amateur theatre group, can find no substantial coverage in RS, just passing mentions in two obituaries, fails WP:ORG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Old Stagers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old Stagers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Stagers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 22:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Proposed deletion of Country sport

The article Country sport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We have waited 8 years for this 'Link Farm' to be sourced but there was no development. This is why I PROD it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Member States of the League of Nations

Hello RetiredUser2, I changed the date you included[1] of when Mexico joined the League of Nations. Would you let me know where you found the date you wrote? Cheers, Tortillovsky (talk) 22:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Dimbleby Cancer Fund

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Richard Dimbleby Cancer Fund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 00:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Isambard Kingdom Brunel timeline

Template:Isambard Kingdom Brunel timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Late Egyptian Dynasty list

Template:Late Egyptian Dynasty list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wicket-keepers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wicket-keepers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thinking man's/woman's crumpet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thinking man's/woman's crumpet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinking man's/woman's crumpet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Bilorv (talk) 22:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"King William III" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect King William III. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 4#King William III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Certes (talk) 12:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Usertalkpage

Template:Usertalkpage has been nominated for merging with Template:User page. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notice

I have nominated John Brooke-Little for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 01:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wicket-keepers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Wicket-keepers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StickyWicket (talk) 20:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Metre squared per second for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metre squared per second is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metre squared per second until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PianoDan (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of Template:Did you know/Time at templates for discussion

Template:Did you know/Time has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 05:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Time-like" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Time-like has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 2 § Time-like until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 13:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]