Jump to content

User talk:Renamed user qAmatuB4raPru7UcUs6ahamuq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I can see you're fairly new to Wikipedia in terms of your number of edits, so I guess you deserve the benefit of the doubt on this matter, but according to WP:BRD, you really should be discussing this on the article talk page, not attempting to communicate through edit summaries. If you would care to start a thread at Talk:1995 UEFA Champions League Final, I will discuss this issue with you, but until then I will continue to treat your baseless edits as vandalism. – PeeJay 20:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, my German isn't so good, so sources have been hard to find. Perhaps this will do? You can clearly see the club was known as Casino Salzburg until 1997. – PeeJay 20:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are clearly not here to help build an encyclopaedia. If you revert me again, I will report you for vandalism and you will be blocked from editing. – PeeJay 21:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, you've been reported. – PeeJay 18:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at 1994–95 UEFA Champions League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]