Jump to content

User talk:Renamed user dfghtjd64/Archive7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. When you recently edited Transport in East Anglia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NIBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Afc

I had an AfC for [Huw & Tony Williams] that I had requested the Help team move the latest request for review to the top of the page. My watchlist says that you did something on May 7 - but all that appears to have happened is that the request for review has disappeared. not sure what to do next, so am using the second refusal dialogue to re-submit.N1geD (talk) 18:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Renamed user dfghtjd64. You have new messages at Tomtomn00's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 18:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Please take a look and respond. --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 19:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkforward

It's a big step to take for something that's no big deal. Read through some back numbers, look at the questions (especially Keepscases'), look at the stress inducing comments, and work out what you'd do if it failed. (I'd have just carried on as before...) Think about why you want it. And why you need it... Think what experience of admin areas you've had - CSD and prod I've seen. Any SPI, ANI or other such? Then talk again with Panyd or me. Or both. Peridon (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Tide gate

Haha, what a mix up! I'm not touching it again to avoid another double undo. —Torchiest talkedits 18:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, A really bad mix up sorry. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 18:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Single Source tagging

Hey Wilbysuffolk! I'm wondering if you could remove all the one source tags you added to the articles I made. Because, according to {{one source}} — "A single source is not automatically a problem. Good judgment and common sense should be used." — which it is not, it is a good reference. Thanks! --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 18:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok doing it now. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 19:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Done. Very Sorry. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 19:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For fixing the {{one source}} templates on articles! Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 19:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 19:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

A tip

When you find an unnecessary article like Manicure set with one outside link, look at it, and tag it spam. I'm sure I've seen their site before - all those tacky little 'gifts'. I've given this one a level 2 promo warning. There's a hell of a lot of it from Chinese sites. Peridon (talk) 20:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista

Was {{allplot}} a click on the wrong checkbox? Or have I missed something? PamD 22:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

And Da Nang C Hospital and Da Nang Women's Hospital too! Please take more care. PamD 22:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Position of {{stub}} tags

Please remember to put {[tl|stub}} tags after everything except interlanguage links, per WP:ORDER. It makes life easier for stub-sorters and reduces the risk of duplicated stub tags. Thanks. PamD 22:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal

Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1028 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you (at least) autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver.

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial.

On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
AndrewN talk 23:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Angella Reid Article

I noticed that you added a stub tag to the article I recently created on current White House Chief Usher Angella Reid, and I wanted to let you know I will be working to expand the article, so please feel free review the article's assessment later on. --TommyBoy (talk) 08:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion

Take a look at this. Could you make your mass-stubs a bit like that? Anyway, I expanded Narborough Railway Line, which got a DYK after I did 13x expansion. One final thing, how many pages have you created, because you should use {{cite web}} in all of them? I've made 888+. --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 08:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Most have Cite web but I created that on a browser which did not support Provelt annoyingly. I've now back to cite web. I've created 126 pages. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 09:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Fixed another one. My list is here. Thanks! --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 09:07, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
By the way, you do not get DYK credit for Narborough Railway Line, as I expanded it 13x. --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 09:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Autopatroller Nomination

Thank you for nominating me for Autopatroller rights. User:ItsZippy granted the nomination. --TommyBoy (talk) 02:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

That's ok. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 05:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for !voting

at my successful RFA
Thank you, Renamed user dfghtjd64, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Wikipedia's labours. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Adoption

Dear Wilbysuffolk, could you please adopt me as I see you have make transport related pages in the past? From Englandtransport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Englandtransport (talk • contribs) 17:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I can't adopt you but I will be happy to answer any questions you may have, Sorry. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 16:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I'd be happy to adopt you Englandtransport, if you are interested. I run an adoption school.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  17:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I would like it if you could adopt me, User:Adam mugliston.  Englandtransport  Talk  16:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC) 15:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Englandtransport (talk)
First of all, why did you copy my signature? Second of all, when people refer to each other they don't call each other User:something. If you can easily recognise the username to be a name (like mine) most people would just call them by their first name (so rather than calling me User:Adam mugliston, you could just call me Adam). Third of all, fill out this: User:Adam mugliston/Adopt/Entry/Englandtransport.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  18:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for A968 road

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Essex in WikiProject East Anglia

Why does this wikiproject cover Essex because Essex is rarely considered part of East Anglia and when it is only the northern parts are considered part of the area. Also East Anglia is named after one of the seven kingdoms of the Heptarchy and is Essex named after a seperate kingdom in the Heptarchy.

Also Southern Linoclnshire (according to the Redcliffe–Maud Report and I think is only in there so the whole of the fens is in the area) and the whole of the East of England (which ignorant people often confuse with East Anglia) are sometimes included in the definition of East Anglia however they aren't included in the scope of the project (and in my opinion rightly so).

I posted this to WikiProject East Anglia's talk page (I have edited it slightly from what I wrote on there) and I was told to ask you. Eopsid (talk) 13:43, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

In my experience, Essex is often considered part of East Anglia, together with Suffolk, Norfolk and Cambridgeshire.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  14:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
see File:East Anglia UK Locator Map.svg.Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 14:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
There is alot of debate about this on Talk:East Anglia, it is clear that East Anglia has no universally accepted definition. Wiktionary says that North Essex, Suffolk, Norfolk and parts of Cambridgeshire are in East Anglia. Dictionary.com only includes Norfolk and Suffolk. The Roman Catholic Diocese of East Anglia only includes Cambridgeshire, Peterboro, Norfolk and Suffolk. I am not sure what my point is because i'd imagine you are already aware it's an informal name for an area. "Light bulb". So is the reason for Essex's inclusion is it's inclusion on the image on the East Anglia article? Eopsid (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I could rename it Wikiproject East of England if enough support for this is shown.Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 20:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Probably wants to keep the rural bits but lose Lahdan and Sarfend. Can't say as I blame 'im (LOL)! Britmax (talk) 15:53, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

The reason Essex is included is that in Wilbysuffolk's experience and mine too, Essex is always included in the definition of East Anglia, especially North Essex. And since it would be rather silly to include North Essex, but not South, meaning a new project may have to be created for South Essex and that would be especially difficult since there is not clear definition between north and south Essex, as they are not council districts or anything similar, Wilbysuffolk decided to include all of Essex.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  16:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of B1348 road for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B1348 road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B1348 road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: BLP Prod on Shehan Gunawardena

Hi. Please check the history - I did not create the article, I simply moved it to correct the capitalization. I will move the notice from my talk page, and place it on the talk page of the article's creator, Shehan1986 :) Thank you.  BarkingFish  15:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I used twinkle. By the way you need to move the page properly clicking move not copying and pasting. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 15:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I did move the page properly, I used the Move button, and it created a redirect. Please look at the history on Shehan Gunawardena and you will see the Move entry in the log, and Shehan1986's name below it.  BarkingFish  15:47, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh then it's twinkles error, sorry. I will look in to that. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 15:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I've alerted Twinkle's creator, AzaToth to the issue in IRC already, hopefully he will tell me what needs doing, or simply go into the code and do it.  BarkingFish  15:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1028 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roydon Common, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bog Orchid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1028 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH!

News

Good article nominee AFCH script improvements
  • 1.16 to 1.17
    • Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU

Page Curation newsletter

Hey Renamed user dfghtjd64. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

River Brett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to River Stour and Hadleigh
Prees Heath Common (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Whitchurch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

List of bus routes in Ely

Hi. I no longer regularly edit Wikipedia, though I do pop back now and again. I have just been looking through the Ely, Cambridgeshire article and spotted the empty page List of bus routes in Ely (part of the tiny Buses section. Do you know what happened to the list and is this easily fixable? --Senra (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

It was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Ely (2nd nomination). This is not easily fixable. It would be best to replace the "Buses" section in the Ely article with whatever sourced information about bus services there is available. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
OK. Thank you for your rapid response. --Senra (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Buses section of Ely, Cambridgeshire now deleted as I don't (yet?) have sources to replace it with --Senra (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1028 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

Delivered 00:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Renamed_user_dfghtjd64/Archive7&oldid=1151051299"