User talk:Renamed user 5417514488/archive 8
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.
Withdraw
[edit]Like this? Veracious Rey talk ↔ contribs 06:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
New Year
[edit]- I Hope You Have A Happy New Year Renamed user 5417514488!!!! ¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
I hope that you have a wonderful New Year and will party all night long. If you don't celebrate New year at this time well then happy early or late New Year and I still advise that you have a good time tonight!!! ¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC) | 
|
Happy New Year
[edit]I don't have a fancy template, but I hope you have a Happy New Year--SUIT 00:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
category
[edit]Thanks a lot. But I would like to know what exactly you did to create the page. I thought I was following the Wikipedia instructions on how to create a Category article, but it didn't work.--LAZY 1L 01:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Could you tell me exactly what you wrote when you started the the page?--LAZY 1L 00:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
oh,ok,thanks. interesting though, cuz WP [1] seems to describe a different way for making a Category article, and I followed those instructions.
Also, you mentioned that I should tell you if the Category is nominated for deletion. It was.--LAZY 1L 15:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Mistake
[edit]If you notice, the user blanked his own talk page, the warnings were there beforehand. Happy new years, and cheers. Canadian-Bacon 05:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry That was my mistake! I've forgot to threw another warning to him when he blanked his previous warnings.
Happy New Year!--JForget 05:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- No worries, it happens to the best of us, happy new years, and happy editing. Canadian-Bacon 05:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
tone
[edit]I noticed that you take a very authoritative tone, which agrivates some users on wikipedia. Please remember that you have no higher authority than any other wikipedian, and disagreeing with you does not equal disruption. This is just a friendly note asking you to stop and think about how you treat others on wikipedia in the future. Fresheneesz 04:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Happy 2007!
[edit]Happy new year, and thanks. >Radiant< 07:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Re:Would you like me to nominate you on RfA?
[edit]Thanks but I don't feel ready. Maybe when I get more Wikipedia and Wikipedia talk edits. Thanks, though--SUIT 08:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Adminship
[edit]Nah, I'm not interested in being an admin. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Yuser31415
[edit]Thanks for welcoming me to wikipedia. I'll be sure to check those tip's out. And have a happy new year^^,. --Balder 19:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi again, I'm currently working on a selected special effects filmography for the ILM article. Since both Weta Digital and Digital Domain have a filmography on their article, and ILM has had such a impact on visual effects industry their article deserve a filmography. But the problem is; it's hard to be sure about how many movies they have been involved in. Everybody who knows about them, would know they were founded to do the Star Wars movies, and Jurassic Park, but just two days ago I found out (by cheking the credits) they were the visual effects company on Cheaper by the Dozen 2. A movie that required little, or no, cgi. So the thing is; the [[Industrial Light & Magic|ILM] article refers to a fansite: http://www.ilmfan.com/ . And this site lists the films, but I don't trust the site 100%, and I suspect that neither do the other Wikipedians. obviously I don't have all the film's they listed, so I can't go through all the credits. My question to you is; If I double-check the most significant of the films listed, and make a filmography on the 15-25 most important films, and call it selected special effects filmography. Will it be accepted by the wikipedia experts? --Balder 20:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, I'll get to it then^^--Balder 14:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello. According to the page history [2] , it looks like you removed my support vote for Shirahadasha. Could you please explain why you did this(or if you didn't)? Cheers and Happy New Year! --Banana04131 01:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Yuser32415! On advice I expanded my answers to the RfA questions and other editors have asked additional questions. Perhaps this might provide you with more information. I appreciate your feedback very much. Thanks, --Shirahadasha 10:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for taking the time to reconsider my application. I really value your input. Thanks, --Shirahadasha 20:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Yabasic
[edit]Hi, i tried to add more to the yabasic page but not sure what do with it atm. As you have used yabasic for a longer time than me perhaps you should have another look at the page, perhaps the first part could be better but i'm not familiar with all the terms used there. I can't get it featured on my own. DarkLoki 15:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok thats great, that would give us a push in the right direction (i guess that is not a english phrase..) DarkLoki 21:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year
[edit]-
Please click on useless image. Happy New Year from a complete maniac. Nina Odell 19:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Since you liked my essay, here's the card I made out of it. Also, there's a special secret essay posted on the talk page of my sandbox. It's not ready for the Wikipedia "world-at-large" just yet, so read it there for the time being. Cheers!Nina Odell 16:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)