User talk:ReformedArsenal/Archive 54
This is an archive of past discussions with User:ReformedArsenal. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | → | Archive 60 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, ReformedArsenal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Gibraltar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gibraltar. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Traité sur les apparitions des esprits et sur les vampires ou les revenans de Hongrie, de Moravie, &c.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Traité sur les apparitions des esprits et sur les vampires ou les revenans de Hongrie, de Moravie, &c.. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Are you
The Reformed Arsenal in the non-WP world? If so, have seen your work there. Thank you for corrective category edit to TT article. Please, if you find any inaccuracies in article, raise issues in Talk. I am the editor most responsible for its recent updating—going there in response to an issue raised to me about its poor sourcing. I am not an expert, and have limited knowledge of PCA, denominational matters, clerical controversy, etc. (I am simply a generally experienced scholarly writer.) So, if you have suggestions, I will certainly engage them seriously, there in Talk, and via followup editing. Note, if one is too close to a subject personally, it is best to follow that course (suggesting directions and ideas in Talk, rather doing the editing oneself, and risking appearance of COI/NPOV). Cheers, and again, do raise any matters, esp. of inaccuracy. Leprof 7272 (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- I am! I totally agree with the COI/NPOV thing, and although I've been on a long break, I was once VERY active as a Wikipedia editor. I removed them without discussion because on BLP issues it is better to err on the side of caution and lack of information, than having incorrect information.ReformedArsenal (talk) 18:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)