User talk:Realqiao

Hello, Realqiao, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome from Shinya

Hi, Qi. This is Shinya (Tomozojisan). I make a comment for trying. See you on Tuesday! --Tomozojisan (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentoring

Hi there, glad to have you on board. I hope I can be a resource for you in getting to know Wikipedia, and with more advanced techniques when your ready for them. If you let me know what sort of articles you'll be working on, I may also be able to give some tips on writing and looking for sources. Best of luck!-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 05:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia entry improvement

Here is a brief summary of what I have done to improve the entry "Telecom Infrastructure Sharing".

Generally, I determine this article has major flaw with no regulatory reference. It mentioned twice about how telecom infrastructure sharing depended on regulation and legislation before I modified it. However, it never gave a reference of regulation. Hence, I add regulatory review of infrastructure sharing.

Mentor here, the added information looks good, though I would try to give it more of an encyclopedic feel by removing words like "Generally" or "Basically", which tend to be part of making an argument, rather than reporting neutrally. There's also probably too much use of bold text in this article, and it has bulletpoints which could be made into paragraphs instead. Just some thoughts, and let me know how it goes!-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 20:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imrovement of infrastructure sharing article - from JMBauer

Nice work, you made very substantive contributions. --JMBauer (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC) A few more thoughts: you added a passage on the FCC, which is a little superfluous in the context of this artcile; the link would probably suffice. Also, you mention interconnection and reciprocal compensation arrangements, which are, narrowly speaking, not part of infrastructure sharing. Maybe add that updated sharing provisions were adopted together with other reforms in the Telecom Act 1996. What could be referenced in the article is Section 224 of the Communications Act as amended (defined the rights of access to poles) and the "ladder of investment model" that envisions that new entrants will initially share but then migrate toward their own facilities investment. --JMBauer (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Second Wikipedia Entry Improvement

Firstly, Thank you, Patrick and Professor Bauer, for your suggestions of my last wiki improvement. Here is a new attempt.

I was trying to improve the entry--spectrum management. It lacks further explainations of some key content, such as changing demand for spectrum, various approadches carried out of specturm management, public interest and digital transition as a major driving force of new policies.

However, I met some obstacles in editing it because the person who edited before me seemed not very happy about my work. I don't know whether he is going to revert it one more time. Just in case you couldn't see my editing on the wikipage.--qiaoqi 17:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Final assignment topic: Cybercrime in China

References

Hong Lu. Bin Liang and Melanie Taylor. A Comparative Analysis of Cybercrimes and Governmental Law Enforcement in China and the United States. Ansian Journal Of Criminology. Volume 5. Number 2. 123-135. 2010

Kam C. Wong. "CYBERSPACE GOVERNANCE IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA" The Selected Works of Kam C. Wong. 2008 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kam_wong/34

Minying. Pang. Rights of Customers in Electronic Commerce. Heibei Law Science. 2005

Nir Kshetri. The Global Cybercrime Industry—Economic, Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Springer. 2010

Steven Philippsohn. Trends In Cybercrime—An Overview Of Current Financial Crimes On The Internet. Computers & Security. Elsevier. 2001

Yip. M. University of Southampton. An investigation into Chinese cybercrime and the underground economy in comparison with the West. In: Invited talk at Netcraft. 7th Dec. 2010.

--qiaoqi 19:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Some ideas for articles

Hi Qi, while I can make some suggestions for articles to look at, it really needs to be a topic you're interested in, and want to put the necessary time into. Before you go and create a new article, I looked around for some existing articles similar to those interests you mentioned, and came up with some thoughts. The article on Computer crime is long and unorganized. Wikipedia so far doesn't seem to have articles on cybercrime in specific countries. The Convention on Cybercrime needs to be broadened for other countries, as does the article on Cyberstalking legislation. On specifically Chinese topics, "Jingjing and Chacha", on internet surveillance, that's short and in need of work. There's also an article on Chinese intelligence operations in the United States, which goes into the Google related Operation Aurora, among other topics. Or, if you wanted, there is also an article on Blocking of Wikipedia by the People's Republic of China. If you do end up creating a new article on computer crime in China, be sure to try to integrate into some of these existing articles by adding sentences or links where relevant. Good luck, and let me know what you decide!-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 00:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional feedback from Johannes M. Bauer

Hi Qi, this certainly is an interesting topic. One concern I have is that we would like to focus on themes relevant to US policy in the course and the wikipedia entries. Cybercrime in China is certainly important but it is only of indirect interest to the US (e.g., until recently, China used to be a major source of spam and malware, although the latest observations seem to indicate that the country was successful in quenching these sources of malicious activity). One way to generate a stronger US focus is to emphasize the international nature of cybercrime, the problems of coping with a highly agile and internationally mobile problem, and what could be done about it by US policy, policy makers in foreign nations, and the international community. You could then use China as a case in point. Let's meet and talk about this some more. A few additional references to consider are: OECD. (2009). Computer Viruses and Other Malicious Software. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Bauer, J.M. and Van Eeten, M.J.G. (2009) “Cybersecurity: stakeholder incentives, externalities, and policy options,” Telecommunications Policy, 33(10-11): 706-719. Van Eeten, M.J.G., Bauer, J.M., Asghari, H. and Tabatabaie, S. (2010). The role of Internet Service Providers in Botnet Mitigation, STI Working Paper 2010/5, Paris: OECD.--JMBauer (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback by JM Bauer on your spectrum management edits

You made several improvements that increase the readbility and accuracy of the entry. I fixed several typos and grammatical mistakes (please proofread your changes in "Read" mode. --JMBauer (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Ben

I just finished reading you article. I think you did overall a good job. I have a few remarks. I think you absolutely need an overview before the content! You content table is fairly big and if you don't write an overview before it then you need to scrawl down to access the first words, i don't think this is good. I think that topology and threats should be only one section, it makes more sense to me. I think the article could need some more links to other wikipedia entries, specially technical or specific entries such as targeted attacks, malware, viruses, etc... Beside that your article is well referenced. My last point is that when you talk about the US and China you start as a section with sentences and explications and then you switch to a list of items, this was a little confusing to me.Rick.james850 (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Wenjuan

This is an interesting topic. But I have some suggestions: 1. Since it is along entry could you provide some navigations. I don't mean the content table but some text which could provide a road map of the entry. 2. This entry involves lots of technical terms, such as viruses targeted attacks. Could you provide more explanations for them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wenjuanma (talk • contribs) 20:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]