Jump to content

User talk:RayBirks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Initial welcome

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!
Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Thanks

[edit]

I appreciate your work on expanding Democracy: The God That Failed from a stub. Let me know if I can assist you in the future. Dick Clark 18:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gerber/Hart Library

[edit]

This article is not posted at WP:AFD it has been marked with a "prod" tag. "Prod" tags can be added by anyone, and if you disagree with the tag you can remove it witout discussion. If the person who added the prod tag disagrees, then the article may be listed at AFD. If you think the library is notable, and meets the standards listed at WP:NOTABLE, then simply remove the tag. It is at the top of the page and looks like this:

{{dated prod|concern = {{{concern|Non-notable}}}|month = August|day = 8|year = 2006|time = 15:54|timestamp = 20060808155424}}

You might also put a note explaining your reasoning on the article's talk page, and/or on the talk page of the person who added the PROD tag. Any questions? I'm happy to help. -- Samuel Wantman 19:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel, I understood what you meant and concurred, but things seem to have changed in a short time. Thanks for your continued tutelage. -- RayBirks 01:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to get someone's attention, put a message on their talk page (like the way you got my attention). Some people will leave a message on a talk page and say "reply here, I'm watching the page". This often works, but there is no automatic notification, you have to notice the page in your watchlist or remember to look back for a reply. Sometimes, for the sake of keeping a conversation in one place, I'll reply on the original talk page, and leave a short message on a users talk page, saying simply "I've replied here. -- Samuel Wantman 06:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs and categories...

[edit]

Wikipedia:Category and Wikipedia:Stub are the two natural places to start. If there's anything specific you're unclear about, please feel free to ask. Alai 04:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- RayBirks 05:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long articles are only really stubs if they're very short in text, but long on stats, lists, tables, etc; or if they're very obviously more-incomplete-than-not in a key manner. For articles that are longer, but still somewhat incomplete, there are other annotations, like the {{expand}} template, talk-page "classification" templates (like "start-class article", etc). Alai 05:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and Madagascar Plan isn't a stub, and doesn't have any stub categories: it has "ordinary" or "permanent" article-space categories, that are there for reader reference, as opposed to stub types, and other "maintenance" categories, which are there for the benefit of editors. Alai 05:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Coffee as this week's WP:AID winner

[edit]
 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Coffee was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

– ClockworkSoul 04:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Money and Banking in the United States

[edit]

Hello, concerning your contribution, History of Money and Banking in the United States, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mises.org/rothbard/salerno.pdf. As a copyright violation, History of Money and Banking in the United States appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. History of Money and Banking in the United States has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:History of Money and Banking in the United States. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at History of Money and Banking in the United States, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — Mateo SA (talk | contribs) 05:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

[edit]

Hi. You recently reverted my edit to Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was an attempt to fix vandalism in the form of mass copying-and-pasting of the article. You therefore reverted back to the vandalised version; another anonymous user tried to fix it, and ClueBot, being stupid, reverted back to you... in short, thanks to you the article has now been like that all day, and I've only just fixed it again; please don't revert this latest edit as well otherwise we'll be going round in circles forever. Have a look at the page history: note how the article has been around 9,600 bytes for ages and then suddenly jumps to 355,000 bytes? That's not new content, that's garbage copies of the original, and it's quite obvious when you look at it. Please do so before jumping to the revert button in future. Thanks – Gurch 05:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P/E

[edit]

You wrote:

Does anyone have a link we could include that points to average market P/E ratios during various downturns? It would be very helpful to see real-life examples of where P/E ratios have ended up in the depths of a recession/depression.
Upon further thinking, I realized that you had a very good question. I have just added some data.--Chakreshsinghai (talk) 00:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Paul

[edit]

Why so he is. Show's how much I know about US politics... Thankyou!Larklight (talk) 20:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Circuit (film)

[edit]

I have nominated Circuit (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circuit (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ros0709 (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning editors

[edit]

Hi Ray, I saw your post on Thingg's talk page and issued the warning. To answer your question, yes, you may warn editors when you see them doing something wrong. You should have a look at WP:UTN to see various templates that use optimized wording. You may want to try them out in the sandbox to test. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 04:49, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives (finance)

[edit]

Hi,

Clearing does not eliminate counterparty risk. Clearing houses are distinct from exchanges. That is, just because a clearing house handles the trade information, they do not necessarily operate as a central counterparty. This is especially the case in OTC Derivatives. See e.g., http://www.dtcc.com/products/derivserv/

Therefore, your edits to the Derivatives article are inaccurate. Please feel free to contact me on my talk page if this is unclear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erdosfan (talk • contribs) 23:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Derivatives talk page.Erdosfan (talk) 23:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Real Business Cycle Theory

[edit]

I noticed your change in the RBCT section, and I think the change was the right one content-wise, but I feel like the language could flow a little better. Here is the current text:

Economists have come up with many ideas to answer the above question. The one which currently dominates the academic Real Business Cycle Theory literature was introduced by Finn E. Kydland and Edward C. Prescott in their seminal 1982 work “Time to Build And Aggregate Fluctuations.”

I'd like to propose we say something like this instead:

Finn E. Kydland and Edward C. Prescott, in their seminal 1982 work “Time to Build And Aggregate Fluctuations.”, introduced what became known as Real Business Cycle Theory as one answer to this question.

Or maybe a phrasing like this:

Finn E. Kydland and Edward C. Prescott introduced one answer to this question in their seminal 1982 work “Time to Build And Aggregate Fluctuations.” This answer later became known as Real Business Cycle Theory.

What do you think? Comments? Criticisms? 75.82.133.73 (talk) 10:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm glad you asked. I have seen so much spam and vandalism of late that my cursory look at the change you mention looked like more of the same. At the very least, it was perhaps carelessly added. A simple comment from me would have alleviated any concern, I think, but I erred on the side of believing it was spam.
That said, your considered reply is welcome, and I believe I slightly prefer your first approach, but either would do just fine. Thanks again for your care in editing. --RayBirks (talk) 19:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Burzmali (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:TSRiss12.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TSRiss12.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Earth Under Fire

[edit]

The article Earth Under Fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insubstantial content, orphaned, uncategorized and unlinked to other articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Earth Under Fire for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earth Under Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth Under Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sadads (talk) 03:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, RayBirks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, RayBirks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Samuelson's "Economics" Entry.

[edit]

Ray,

I see your sensible comments on the Wikipedia entry for Samuelson's "Economics," and write for solace. Your valid point apart, the whole article strikes me as scandalously inept. (I've posted two notes in the talk page over there.)

Do you know enough about the Wikipedia system to get the thing pulled and replaced, either by something competent or by a simple placeholder?

Best wishes,

David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

== David, I frequent Wikipedia only intermittently so am likely not your best source here. [Heck, I can't even remember how to indent an entry!!] I am not a fan of Mr. Samuelson's outlook and work, so I may be biased. You might start by creating a topic on such on the related "Talk" page. My experience, however, is that people of different philosophies don't process suggestions well. One can only begin! -- Ray Birks (Chicago, Illinois) 9/3/2017

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, RayBirks. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago killings in Rogers Park neighborhood (October 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hammersoft (talk) 18:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RayBirks! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hammersoft (talk) 18:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago killings in Rogers Park neighborhood (October 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Duck walk killer instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, RayBirks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Silver gold ratio" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Silver gold ratio and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Silver gold ratio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Life Is Just a Bowl of Cherries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fosse. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RayBirks&oldid=1187188519"