User talk:Raphaelji

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Hello, Raphaelji, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Quick introduction to Wikipedia
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLOS Computational Biology
Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)
A few tricks to help you format references are at WP:MEDHOW

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, try Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your own talk page.

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to visit the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Raphaelji, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Raphaelji! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

17:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Welcome again, and note Conflicts of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Raphael. You are a brand new editor, and while you are obviously an expert in the real world, there is a lot to learn about how Wikipedia works - this is kind of a strange place! I've added a greeting from WP:MED, of which I am a part.

Thanks for clearly disclosing your conflict of interest with regard to Rudolph Stone and polarity therapy in this dif. That is very decent of you. I am going to provide you with our conflict of interest notice -- here:

Hello, Raphaelji. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

If there is anything I can do to help you get oriented here, please feel free to ask me. And again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Randolph Stone

Unfortunately, it seems the article on Randolph Stone will be deleted. The sources provided thus far are mostly not acceptable in satisfying WP:RS. I see a few that do, however they are being ignored. If we are to keep this article, we require high quality sourcing. Books about Randolph Stone, Magazine articles about him, newspaper articles, etc. They do not need to be available online, paper sources are perfectly acceptable. Kindzmarauli (talk) 21:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]