User talk:Rajveer90

Your draft

Your draft in your sandbox won't be reviewed until you submit it for review. I have added a button at the top of the draft for you to do so. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that you should read Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything and modify your draft article. It will not pass review in its current state because the cited sources don't demonstrate that the subject is notable.

Some sources are interviews, which don't count toward notability of the subject
Other sources are reviews of the book, not coverage of the author
None of the sources provide any in-depth coverage of the author, just small details

You might consider recasting the article to be about the book that has received a lot of coverage, instead of about the author. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review Process

I have read the guidelines but can you please tell me what type of references Wikipedia need for review?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasbir Singh (author) has been accepted

Jasbir Singh (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:44, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review Process

Can you tell me why an article of Jabir Singh author has taken from the draft box?

A page you started (Jasbir Singh (author)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jasbir Singh (author).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thank you for developing the new article on Jasbir Singh (author). Note that other editors have questioned whether some of the sources in the article are reliable. See WP:RS for pointers.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem in page

Thanks for reviewing the page. It means a lot to us. First day when I opened it was available on google but now I am not able to open the page by the article name i.e. Jasbir Singh autor. Everytime I have to put the link.

Kindly resolve this issue. Rajveer90 (talk) 08:18, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review Process

I have created a draft of the book I am also a human. Can you tell when the review process will start?

Your email

Hi Rajveer90. I recieved an email from you but I do not know what article you are referring to so am unable to help. Please reply here on User talk:Rajveer90, I will see your reply. Fish+Karate 13:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about the book draft titled I am also a human.

Hi again, this is User:Rajveer90/sandbox/I am also a human. It is not protected, and has never been protected. Regards, Fish+Karate 13:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not getting it. What is protected?

How can I protect this?

You cannot protect it. Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Please read the content within the following blue links: Welcome to Wikipedia, and Contributing to Wikipedia. Fish+Karate 15:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to protect the draft. I am looking forward to the review process. Can you tell when the review process will start?

I have submitted the article to the Articles for Creation process. To do this yourself in future, add {{subst:submit}} to the top of your draft article. As the guidance at the top of your article - User:Rajveer90/sandbox/I am also a human - says, please now be patient as it can take some time for pages to be reviewed. Fish+Karate 10:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I am also a human (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I am also a human and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:I am also a human, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 18:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajveer90! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 18:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How much it takes for accepting draft

I have submitted draft of book I am also a human for three or four months ago for review. It has been declined two times by editors as it lacks references but two months ago I used two references more but there is no response since two months. It is still in draft. It is still showing that it can take eight weeks from the last two months. Kindly help me in this issue.

Your submission at Articles for creation: I am also a human has been accepted

I am also a human, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the draft of Samreen Kaur, a Punjabi actress featured in many ad campaigns, videos and Miss. Jammu and Kashmir top 3 finalist. I have provided all required references which include Times of India interview, times now interview, Miss India pageant news etc. I have made two article earlier and this draft has everything but still it's taking much time and response yet.

(Rajveer90 (talk) 17:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

How much time it takes to accept a draft?

I have made the draft of Samreen Kaur, a Punjabi actress featured in many ad campaigns, videos and Miss. Jammu and Kashmir top 3 finalist. I have provided all required references which include Times of India interview, times now interview, Miss India pageant news etc. I have made two articles earlier and all were reviewed very well and this draft has everything but still it's taking much time and response yet.

(Rajveer90 (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hello! I have made the draft of Samreen Kaur three weeks ago but still there is no response from your side. Can anyone tell me how much time it takes more

Rajveer90 (talk) 23:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It has been around one and half month. I haven't received any update on the draft that I've submitted of Samreen Kaur. Kindly reply so that I can make changes according to that.

(Rajveer90 (talk) 01:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samreen Kaur (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samreen Kaur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samreen Kaur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have resubmitted the draft as I have added two more media links that can verify her. I hope it will help you.Rajveer90 (talk) 05:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Why does a man rape (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

sources given are mainly or exclusively reprints of press releases

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Why does a man rape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Why does a man rape, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sources that I have provided are from different media channels. They have the same content but they are from different media channels such as The Policy Times, Divergemedia, The Times, and Buffalo News. I have made two articles before and I think these resources are enough to provide the verifiability of the book. Looking for your response as I have resubmitted draft. Rajveer90 (talk) 19:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Why does a man rape (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bilorv were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Why does a man rape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Why does a man rape, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They don't show only mention if you clearly read the Policy Times article or Diverge Media, it clearly shows about book. Like in the policy times article it talks about the book and says that ‘Why Does A Man Rape?’; Uncovering the Dark Truths behind the Heinous Act of Rape. Moreover, other articles also talk about the book it's just they have mentioned the author in the beginning and then they have talked about the book but that doesn't mean it is only a mention. In addition, every article shows that what is inside the book and why the author has written it like "This book addresses some taboo and controversial issues related to rape. Why do people rape? Who to blame for rapes? Is rape confined to the human race? Is this new in this generation or are there any references to such incidents in our history? Such questions are answered fluently in his book, 'Why does Man rape'. Kindly tell me your review on this so that I can resubmit it @Bilorv Rajveer90 (talk) 21:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samreen Kaur (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MarioJump83 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While the draft is not promotional, I have checked the sources but they don't show significant coverage about Samreen Kaur. Also, this article is quite short so this needs to be expanded.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samreen Kaur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samreen Kaur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mario Jump 83! 10:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Why does a man rape has been accepted

Why does a man rape, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mario Jump 83! 04:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhupesh Bansal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bhupesh Bansal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon 04:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[user:DMySon| I have created around three or four articles by following the Wikipedia guidelines. This article of Bhupesh Bansal has enough information on Google as it has good media links which shows his credibility and importance of thiss article. This page is not created to promote anyone. It is created to provide information about a person who is doing good stuff and people get information about when they search. Kindly help me how I can develop this more so it won't delete. Rajveer90 (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabhit Kapur (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tatupiplu was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the links look like PR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabhit Kapur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nabhit Kapur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tatupiplu'^talk 04:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tatupiplu'

There are more than fifteen references of big media houses like Forbes, Hindustan times, Statesman, Mid day etc. Nabhit Kapur has recieved several awards and has enough information on google. How the references cannot pass for Wikipedia article. I understand there are two or three references which can be same but not all links are same and PR.

I will delete those references, modify it and submit for review. Kindly have a look on that. Rajveer90 (talk) 04:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rajveer90, The Subject is not notable. Forbes, Hindustan Times, Statesman, Mid Day are all press releases. Tatupiplu'^talk 04:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tatupiplu'

There are more than fifteen references. What about them?

Links of media houses like Times of Africa, The top 100 magazine, Muslim mirror, The Week, Sunday Guardian live. They all are notable resources. The pictures and content clearly shows that he received the awards. I will delete the HT, Mid day and Forbes references, but still draft has more than ten references which shows its notability. Rajveer90 (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rajveer90, No, all of them are PR. For Sunday Guardian Live & The Week. I've seen such PR articles before. Tatupiplu'^talk 04:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tatupiplu' All of them cannot be PR. He is a notable person. I have spent a lot of time doing the research and find information about him. His organization Peaceful Mind working tirelessly during this Covid 19. And when I came to know about him. I thought of making Wikipedia article.

Moreover, PR articles are those in which newspaper or media houses say that they dont belong to the article but there are articles which is written by the newspaper editors. I have made other Wikipedia articles and have seen PR references too. I have deleted the Forbes, Mid day, Statesmen all these references.

I will submit it because I checked other people psychologists articles too and can say surely that not all them are PR. Rajveer90 (talk) 04:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nabhit Kapur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nabhit Kapur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 05:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Rajveer90. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deb,

I was not promoting Nabhit Kapur at all. I don't know the person personally. I was not advertising him. And I don't know why you think that I was promoting him. I understood that some of the references were PR media links but I have deleted them when it was rejected.

I don't have any internal or external relationship with the person. I have created other articles too and I can assure that article was not influenced by him. Moreover, he is a notable psychologist. I attended his seminar once in my university and then searched about him. He is founder of Peaceful Mind Foundation registered under UN. He is the recipient of several awards which includes Rex Karamveer Chakra, instituted by the UN, India, African Peace Laureate, African Union and African Child foundation, Nigeria etc. Moreover, he is an author of book titled "Pyschology" available on Amazon.

In addition, I haven't received any money or compensation from anyone for creating Wikipedia articles. And I don't believe in taking money as Wikipedia is a reliable source and if I create the articles by taking money, it wouldn't be right.

I have read all the points that you mentioned. I can create draft again and wont add any PR media links and the content which shows that it is promotional article. Kindly suggest me if you know anything or want me to make any changes.

Thank you Deb Rajveer90 (talk) 17:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an example of promotional wording: "He is perhaps the psychologist in the contemporary world, and the only one from India, leading this remarkable movement to make mental health a household name." Apart from the poor English, that seems to be something you just made up - it's not justified by the content of either of the articles you've quoted as references. Deb (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for sharing this Deb

I will again create the draft and delete all the content which cannot be justified by the references. I will add only that content which can be justified with reliable media references not PR.

Will that be fine?

If you like to suggest me anything more than I would be grateful. It's a great learning experience from you.

Thank you again Deb Rajveer90 (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deb

Anything else you want to share from your knowledge. It would be quite helpful for me to create the article.

Looking forward to your reply.

Thank you Deb

March 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Nabhit Kapur, from its old location at User:Rajveer90/sandbox/Nabhit Kapur. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello [User talk:Nathan2055|,

Thank you for this. It's appreciated. Rajveer90 (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Rajveer90! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for the welcome talk

Would love to explore these links and make more useful articles in the future.

Rajveer90 (talk) 23:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabhit Kapur (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabhit Kapur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nabhit Kapur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Umakant Bhalerao

Nabhit Kapur is famous pyschologist from India. I haven't provided any PR references and haven't promoted in any way. TedTalks, APN news, The Week, The Times of Africa, they all are reliable and good media sources.

If you think this was written more like in a advertisement then please mention the content. I will change the content, write from neutral point of view and then submit it.

Looking forward to your valuable response.

Thank you Umakant Bhalerao Rajveer90 (talk) 13:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether he is notable or not , as i have not read through all the sources yet. I have not declined your submission due to lack of independent/reliable references or notability concerns. It was declined because the submission reads like an advertisement, particularly the Professional life section, and needs a rewrite to conform to WP:NPOV standards. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising. The sole purpose of it is to create promotional-free articles.Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Umakant Bhalerao

I am aware of this fact that Wikipedia don't accept promotional articles. I have changed the professional section and deleted some lines which looked like promotional. Kindly have a look again and let me know your views.

Please guide me again if any content looks like an advertisement in the professional life section. It would be easy for me to rewrite and then submit for review.

Looking forward to your valuable response.

Thank you Umakant Bhalerao Rajveer90 (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Rajveer90! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:54, Saturday, April 3, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Rajveer90! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:59, Saturday, April 3, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabhit Kapur has been accepted

Nabhit Kapur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mottezen (talk) 06:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nabhit Kapur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nabhit Kapur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 06:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nabhit Kapur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nabhit Kapur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 06:35, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Nabhit Kapur

Draft:Nabhit Kapur, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nabhit Kapur and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Nabhit Kapur during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hatchens (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nabhit Kapur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nabhit Kapur. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 06:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabhit Kapur (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more independent sources for WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabhit Kapur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nabhit Kapur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jasbir Singh (author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasbir Singh (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasbir Singh (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 10:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Why does a man rape for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Why does a man rape is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why does a man rape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 12:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Am Also a Human for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Am Also a Human is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am Also a Human until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 12:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samreen Kaur

Hello, Rajveer90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samreen Kaur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]