User talk:InfiniteNexus

This is InfiniteNexus's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28: 14 days

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Your draft article, Draft:King Kong (TV series)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "King Kong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article need to move

Hi InfiniteNexus can you move article Watchmen (film) to Watchmen (2009 film)? because there is an animated film adaptation will be release in august 2024 Draft:Watchmen (2024 film) Venom5122 (talk) 06:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) That 2009 film's title should only be changed if the animated film uses that title and only if the latter's draft is moved with the same title. The animated film draft also does not seem ready for a move to the mainspace yet as it is unclear if final animation or voice recording has begun., and that draft is by all standards a stub. I will also note that the August release date traces to Blu-ray.com (an unreliable source not affiliated with the actual company, and that listing has changed this date), so it is unknown when it will actually release. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Venom5122: I've been away for the past few weeks, so apologies for the late reply. As Trail stated, the page will only be moved if the upcoming film is confirmed to have the same title (Watchmen) and has been moved to the mainspace. Please come back if and when that happens. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Society of Explorers and Adventurers (film)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Society of Explorers and Adventurers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Fire and Ash" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fire and Ash has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 16 § Fire and Ash until a consensus is reached. ScarletViolet t c 11:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alien: Romulus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Walt Disney Studios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Focus on the editor

Please look in the mirror. After not reading the responses and the sources fully (that's why I asked that normal question), you are the one alleging that I "falsely claimed" and accused someone (you?) with my "speculation/misinformation" edit summary (which was about the notes and the reception section edit, but you took it personally) while writing that I do not understand the topic ("who may not have fully understood — such as yourself"). And I definitely don't have any sentences questioning "your intelligence". So instead of attacking and creating scenarios every time you see me (it's not helping to make any progress), you can defend your argument by focusing on providing valid reasons that do not oppose MOS:FILMPLOT (and WP:SYNTH, etc.). ภץאคгöร 13:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyxaros: I don't want to go off on this tangent for too long, but "attack" is a strong word and I didn't "attack" you. It's true that your behavior has been known to be hostile; you must understand that we're all here to improve the encyclopedia and that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. When I said that you didn't "understand", I meant you didn't understand the plot point, which was a testament to the fact that these explanatory footnotes will be helpful. I wasn't insinuating your lack of knowledge in "the topic".

Now, let's refocus on the substance of the argument, which comprised 90% of my latest comment, but of course you chose to focus on the 10% (so your comment here is quite ironic). You can defend your argument by focusing on providing valid reasons that do not oppose MOS:FILMPLOT (and WP:SYNTH, etc.) I did — several times. SYNTH doesn't have anything to do with this, though. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is that why you are still trying to make snide comments like "your behavior is known to be hostile"? You have been commenting on me since you opened the discussion. So, leaving aside your personal grievance against me that nobody cares about (and your opinion that "I didn't understand"), you should also learn what WP:SYNTH is: To, in this case persistently, make a claim that is not explicitly mentioned in the source, for example an Engineer's face. ภץאคгöร 16:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm disturbed by this continued hostility, again, I'm not going to continue with this back-and-forth. The Engineers example you gave was not SYNTH, which means combining sources to reach an OR conclusion; at most, it was an inaccurate summary of the sources — the reason for this is that the original text wasn't even summarizing the sources; it was citing the film itself, per PLOTCITE. If you see the film, you can clearly see that the hybrid has a face resembling an Engineer, but whatever. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]