User talk:InfiniteNexus/Archive 9
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Preferences
Hi, InfiniteNexus, How do you do?
I wish to ask how do I access preferences page in my mobile.
-SB1993 Seaweed Brain1993 (talk) 02:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Seaweed Brain1993: I'm doing good, thanks for asking. Here is the direct link to the mobile version of the Preferences page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Google Wallet
On 12 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Google Wallet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the recently-announced Google Wallet app revives the brand name previously used by a similar service of the same name from 2011 to 2018? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Google Wallet. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Google Wallet), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Chat
Hey friend how are you? Strvenos (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you a sock? InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Sock restoration
Hi, can I ask why you restored this? The comment hadnt been responded to so simply removing it was the best way of enforcing WP:BMB and WP:BRV. Is there a reason you think the comment should be retained? nableezy - 17:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Nableezy: That was a valid comment/vote in a RM discussion. If sockpuppet votes had to be removed from XfD and RM discussions, I would think {{Csp}} would have been deleted by now. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:19, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, it is not a valid comment/vote, it is a comment by a user banned from commenting. I am going to remove it again, you cannot take responsibility for a banned user's talk page comment as opposed to their mainspace contribution. That template is useful for discussions where the socks comments have already been responded to, making it impractical to delete, in which strike throughs would be appropriate. Here there is no such issue. I get that is a vote in support of your position, but really, its unanimous anyway, and b, do you actually think maintaining Icewhiz's commentary adds to your position's validity? nableezy - 17:23, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I endorse the removal. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, it is not a valid comment/vote, it is a comment by a user banned from commenting. I am going to remove it again, you cannot take responsibility for a banned user's talk page comment as opposed to their mainspace contribution. That template is useful for discussions where the socks comments have already been responded to, making it impractical to delete, in which strike throughs would be appropriate. Here there is no such issue. I get that is a vote in support of your position, but really, its unanimous anyway, and b, do you actually think maintaining Icewhiz's commentary adds to your position's validity? nableezy - 17:23, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/LaMDA at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Haha, that's right. Silly me.
Fixed! InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
MCU multiverse
How long until the MCU multiverse draft is considered ready for mainspace? — SirDot (talk) 21:43, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- It's almost done. I just need to fill in the In other media section (Venom 2, Morbius), plus I have a few more sources saved that I want to put in before moving it. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Good to know. I can help with the SSU stuff (just tell me if bulleted or subsections). — SirDot (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- I know character articles often use bullet points for these, but I think paragraph format works fine here to be consistent with the rest of the article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- LTBC stuff done. Morbin' time tomorrow. — SirDot (talk) 22:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks. If I have time later tonight I might also be able to add some of the Morbin' stuff. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- LTBC stuff done. Morbin' time tomorrow. — SirDot (talk) 22:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- I know character articles often use bullet points for these, but I think paragraph format works fine here to be consistent with the rest of the article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Good to know. I can help with the SSU stuff (just tell me if bulleted or subsections). — SirDot (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
You think this image is good enough for the Multiverse page's infobox? Also fixed MoM's year on your DYK nomination (was listed as 2021), my Green Goblin one has been approved and I guess is sitting on queue until appearing on the Main Page on July 22 (in honor of Willem Dafoe's birthday). — SirDot (talk) 23:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'd usually be wary of using the same image as the fan wiki (because it gives the impression that we're lazy copycats), but in this case I genuinely can't think of an alternate shot we could use that shows the multiverse in full. So yes, I think that's good enough. Thanks for spotting that error on the DYK nom, I wish we had a date for What If...? season 2 (the next multiversal property), but alas we don't. I did see the Goblin nom be approved, good job on getting that page to GA status! InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:58, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, that one Loki shot is really the only full-Multiverse shot. Thanks! I'm planning to do DYKs for Peter-One, Peter-Two, and Peter-Three once I get those to GAs, hopefully by the end of the summer. — SirDot (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Went ahead and uploaded it. — SirDot (talk) 05:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like the DYK set that features my Goblin nom isn't going to be updated to the Main Page until 12:13 UTC. Weird. — SirDot (talk) 08:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Went ahead and uploaded it. — SirDot (talk) 05:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, that one Loki shot is really the only full-Multiverse shot. Thanks! I'm planning to do DYKs for Peter-One, Peter-Two, and Peter-Three once I get those to GAs, hopefully by the end of the summer. — SirDot (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, InfiniteNexus
Thank you for creating Disney+ Day.
User:Slywriter, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
What is purpose of standalone article? Seems like a paragraph or two at best in Disney+ article would be appropriate
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Slywriter (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have replied on the article's talk page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Ta-Lo
The entry has been marked for deletion.~~~ Hyju (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. If you want any chance of that article being saved, I would suggest finding reliable sources discussing real-world aspects ASAP. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Hyju: FYI, your other article, Mandarin's rings, is currently in a similar condition to Ta-Lo. I've tagged it with {{In-universe}} and {{All plot}} accordingly, and would advise adding in some real-world information if you wish to avoid a potential AfD in the future. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Google Translate
Dear InfiniteNexus, if you revert someone's edits, please provide a reason. My edit wasn't any experiment, I just spotted a mistake and wanted someone to fix it because the page is blocked. If you unblock the page, I'd be able to edit and fix it by myself. In the section https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Google_Translate#Supported_languages there is listed Sepedi, but in the History section, 49th stage (launched May 2022), Nothern Sotho is listed as added language, but it's the same language. 83.30.149.11 (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was confused by the wording of your post and mistook it for vandalism (as you can see from the page history, that page is a frequent target for vandals). I will reply over there, thanks for the note. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Possible negotiations for a new live-action Wolverine
I know you disagreed with me about the Henry Cavill thing and Captain Britain but what about this? According to Deadline Taron Edgerton has been in talks with Marvel Studios executives about taking on the role of Wolverine. Because this is admitting negotiations by the actor on a reliable source should this be noted in Wolverine in other media? Article is here. 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- @0Detail-Attention215: To be honest I'm not sure. This definitely carries more weight than Cavill's comments, but I personally have not seen cases like this be mentioned on comic character articles. There's also no indication that Marvel Studios is planning to recast Wolverine, or that a new Wolverine film is in development. Possibly, possibly, it could be included at Logan (film character)#Future, but I would suggest posting on that talk page first. InfiniteNexus (talk) 14:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Just because they haven’t openly talked about doesn’t mean they aren’t. Look I understand your policies and I’m trying as hard as I can to follow and respect them without causing problems. But it clashes frequently with my more open minded approach to things. I just wanted to hear what you think about the article. I wasn’t saying anything about a new Wolverine or movie at the time I just was saying if this was something that valid enough to maybe include somewhere. Like how John Krasinski stated he was willing to do Mr. Fantastic. That’s all. 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Like I said, I would suggest raising this matter on the Logan talk page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Just because they haven’t openly talked about doesn’t mean they aren’t. Look I understand your policies and I’m trying as hard as I can to follow and respect them without causing problems. But it clashes frequently with my more open minded approach to things. I just wanted to hear what you think about the article. I wasn’t saying anything about a new Wolverine or movie at the time I just was saying if this was something that valid enough to maybe include somewhere. Like how John Krasinski stated he was willing to do Mr. Fantastic. That’s all. 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)