User talk:Rabidwolfe

Welcome!

Hello Rabidwolfe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links to help you know what's going on at Wikipedia. If you still need help, just put {{helpme}} on your user page.

Also, if you could, please sign my petition

If you'd like to know what's going on in regards to the internal workings of Wikipedia from an experienced user, here's an insight into the unwritten rules of this place.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 02:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project Freemasonry tags

Sorry about that... we had an over enthusiastic new member to the project. Blueboar 00:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Rabidwolfe 00:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Bellamy

You have my sincerest apologies. The article in question links to the Freemason page, and I tried to tag those articles which indicated in the text that the subject of the article was a Freemason. In this particular case, I made a mistake in the quick read through and apparently thought the "him" referred to shortly before the word was Bellamy himself. I note the category was removed as well, and you have my grateful thanks for having caught my mistake, for which I offer my sincerest apologies. John Carter 00:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good! Rabidwolfe 02:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A pleasure collaborating with you

Whichever way the Shadow issueultimately goes, I just want to say how nice it is to work with someone as collegial and friendly as you. I've enjoyed the semiotic give-and-take, and I'm certainly impressed with anyone working on a dissertation. Thank you for your intelligent specifics and good will! --Tenebrae (talk) 03:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Thanks! Rabidwolfe (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And y'know, I've just made a suggestion at Talk:The Shadow (fictional character) that may well address both sides of the issue! --Tenebrae (talk) 05:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fulvic acid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fulvic acid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulvic acid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]