User talk:Raúl Quintana Tarufetti
Welcome Raúl Quintana Tarufetti!
I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Raúl,
I've taken a look at the articles you mentioned and the revversions by you and the other user are multiple so this turns a bit confusing for an editor who has not been involved in the discussion since it started.
Nevertheless Svarter is right when he states that the RSSSF (see page) is a reliable and good source, but it is updated up to 2008 so there are a lot of years missing. The FIFA source indicates 42 wins per side as of Nov 2023. The same result than Promiedos, another good site about statistics. The website Goal.com also indicates a 42-42 tie on wins.
As a result, I'm going to edit the page based on the sources cited. If Svartner reverts my edit, I'll open a discussion at his talk page and, if he does not change his attitude, I won't have any other option than reporting the case at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If I have to do it, I'll notify you asking for your feedback.
Best regards, Fma12 (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Onorem (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brazil national football team records and statistics. Rahio1234 08:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- RE: Your message on my page. You are both edit warring. Look at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. I have no interest in this topic. --Onorem (talk) 21:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- A note for both you and @Rahio1234:, Look at WP:VANDAL and stop saying other users involved in a content dispute are vandalizing. --Onorem (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Raúl_Quintana_Tarufetti reported by User:Onorem (Result: ). Thank you. Onorem (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I only tried to help and correct mistakes of those articles, that were no neutral, with poor sources, clarely in favour of Brazil. The one who started to remove well referenced texts I put was Svartner, not me. Look, first in March: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Then, he started again in May (with the talk page with the issue I´ve already started): [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]. I think he clarely deserves a block too. I gave lot of neutral sources (7), and the only thing it appeared to matter was an accusation agaist me of WP:SPA, and the violation of the three-revert rule (that he also did), but nobody appeared to participate in those articles and no one tried to solve the dispute in the discussion. It was me who satrted the discussion in the talk page [19] to reach an agreement... I gave lot of sources (7), and no one went right to the ponit of the discussion to solve it: the amount of games won by Argentina and by Brazil in the history of the rivalry, and the sources. With the days, as I saw that the other user was very capricious and as nobody participated in the talk page, I had to post in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents informing the situation. But, again, nobody did anything. Instead of participate or trying to solve the dispute, many users started to accusate me... So the final result is that I´m blocked because of a "technicality", but blocked at last... I accept to be part of an edit warring, and I apologise. But please try to understand I didn´t have responses of anybody to participate in the dispute, and the other user Svartner was clarely in the edit war too, and tried to impose his only point of view in favour of Brazil, disrespecting the serious sources I gave. He started this edit war, he also violated three-revert rule as I demonstrate above. It would be fair for him to be blocked too . PD: Oh, I almost forgot: Onorem please, if you read this and you are fair you should report Svartner too, as you did with me [20]. Thanks. Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 23:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are trying to justify your edit warring, not tell why it was wrong. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- They didn't revert again after being warned. You did. That's why you were reported. I assume the administrator who reviewed my report looked at the history. --Onorem (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, but it´s not necessary to be reported to be blocked for violateing one rule. And he violated one too, clarely: in march and in may, as I demonstrated in this post avobe. Ok, I will wait this week and I will return with more knowledge about the functioning of the english wikipedia. I will continue with the spanish one a few minutes a day, where I don´t have problems. Happily I can live without this wikipedia. --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- 331dot: Ok. I only wanted to say that the block was partial and in a point unfair because the edit war was started by Svartner and no one participated to try to solve the principal issue: the sources and the frequent reversals the user Svartner did. If I was blocked, the other user (who started the edit war) deserved to be blocked too. I stop it now here, because I don´t want to aggravate this issue with another technicality typical of Wikipedia. End of this for me. --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 23:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- 331dot and Onorem: please, see the user Svartner continues reverting now today in the article Argentina–Brazil football rivalry, with no consensus, doing the same he did in march and in may, trying to impose his own point of view. He did it today. Look [21] [22] Regards, --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Svartner (talk) 21:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosario Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Rodríguez.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- 1989 Copa América
- added a link pointing to 1970 World Cup
- Brazil national football team
- added a link pointing to 1970 World Cup
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 30
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Gómez (Argentine footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Racing Club.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosario Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miguel Ángel López.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Ennis Hayes article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 14:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Wrong and arbitrary reversals
[edit]Why did you arbitrarily revert my edits in the honors in the articles of Uruguay and Argentina national football teams? Panamerican Championship was not interconfederative competition because it was organized entirely by a single confederation (Panamerican Football Confederation), so it was confederative competition, check your information carefully. I did not add wrong information and I did not make vandalistic edits, so that is misusing the rollback permission. JHLSirius (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm JoshuaJ28. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2024 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Infobox images sorting based on previous winners (until the election results) - not based on opinion polls - it's the norm followed in Wikipedia. Also read discussion. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 12:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ahhh, ok ok. I didn´t know the way the inbox images must be ordered the images! I thougt that they were ordered according to the polls. Thanks for saying me! --Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 18:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)