User talk:RP459/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:RP459. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Photo Copyright
Hey - Thanks for your intro to newbies such as myself. You might note that my User page resembles yours!
I am working on a new Wiki for a mate of mine - Michael Kearns.
I have chosen to copy his existing Wiki to my personal Sandbox to add photos and edits. I will transfer it back to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Michael_S._Kearns when we are all happy it's ready to go.
My question is in regard to Copyright of photos that he has given me to put up. I am getting error/warning messages on all of them.
What's the quickest way to fix this?
Vizmap (talk) 02:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- I am not the best one to talk to as I do not 'do images' :) It looks like the problem you are having is that on Wikipedia we allow only free images or non-free images where a 'fair use' rationale is given for each article it is used on. Is there an image of the person that you have taken? Alternatively as this looks like it is for a politician have they released an image that is free of copyright? One of the people who have tagged the images and have left you messages on your talk page may be able to give you better advice... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 02:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note I have left messages with both User:Angusmclellan & User:Fastily about your request here I hope they can help you more... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 02:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Uploading pictures on Wikipedia is fun! Well, no, not really. Uploading your own pictures is not too bad. Uploading really old ones where the copyright expired is also fairly easy. Uploading ones made by the US Government or its agencies is again simple-ish. The problem is uploading images somebody else took and said "Sure, go ahead and upload it on Wikipedia".
- Does the explanation at User talk:Angusmclellan#Have need your help make sense? I never got an answer from the guy who asked the question, so it might not. While you're thinking about it, best thing to do is to add {{OTRS Pending}} (two curly brackets, the words OTRS Pending and then two closing curly brackets) to the pictures. This tells people they should back off and give some time to get things sorted. If the explanation doesn't make sense, let me know and I'll try to clarify it. Hope this helps, Angus McLellan (Talk) 03:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC) [Also posted at Vizmap's talk]
- Agree with Angus. The messages I have left you are in regards to "missing copyright status" (i.e. you will need a license tag indicating the copyright status of the files as well as the file(s) source(s). The missing license tag issue can easily be resolved by going to WP:ICT/All (Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Displayed and ranked should work as well) and selecting the appropriate tag. If you do not know the copyright of the files in certainty, follow Angus' instructions up above to obtain the appropriate OTRS permission for the file(s). Regards, FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help guys! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 16:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Howdy. You left a clean-up tag on the London Victory Parade of 1946. Are you satisfied with the editing since you did that? Do you have any other suggestions or guidance on policy? Many thanks, -Chumchum7 (talk) 08:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- No, but I will not be re-adding it. My real problem with the article is the writing in London_Victory_Parade_of_1946#Political_Controversy it is a big list of despite the fact... while the section is referenced it looks NPOV to me but I will not be wading into this article and getting involved... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your input. In good faith, I have been trying to make precisely the point you have just made, for about a month. I'm finding it very tough going, and feel ready to quit the project. Given editors attempted to solve the problem you have outlined, but it has come back again, do you think there may be any discernible WP:TE connection your WP:NPOV issue? If so, how should I deal with it? If not, how should I proceed? Many thanks -Chumchum7 (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- I am an outsider to this article so I am trying to WP:AGF and do not have an opinion on if there is WP:TE going on. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 14:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your input. In good faith, I have been trying to make precisely the point you have just made, for about a month. I'm finding it very tough going, and feel ready to quit the project. Given editors attempted to solve the problem you have outlined, but it has come back again, do you think there may be any discernible WP:TE connection your WP:NPOV issue? If so, how should I deal with it? If not, how should I proceed? Many thanks -Chumchum7 (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Ello there, you've put a message to delete the article for Gargoyle due to lack of charting/significant coverage. Are you sure you couldn't find anything? Bear in mind, virtually every piece of coverage on their activities/shows/releases are in Japanese, as they only tour and distribute their releases within Japan. They're very notable within the scene though, and if you need me to I can collect some (japanese) magazine coverage of their tours, as well as winning best band in one of said magazines' contests (second place was Justy Nasty, I believe). I can guarentee though that there are no significant english sources, only japanese ones. Aside from the coverage though, I don't believe they've ever actually been on major music charts, though they do frequently tour with bands who do (not that I think that counts) such as Sex Machineguns. AQWIKI (talk) 07:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is just a WP:PROD tag so if you disagree with the proposed deletion feel free to remove the tag which will stop the proposed deletion... That being said I looked and could not find anything online that would allow them to pass WP:BAND, however I do not speak or read Japanese. If you were to find WP:RS I would not contest the prod removal. I understand that these sources are hard to find; how much time would you need to gather/translate them? Just let me know and I will not take the article to WP:AFD until you had enough time... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 17:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I can easily gather old interviews and magazine references (I have scans as well, if thats any help), but actual translations are out of my power until my japanese-speaking friend shows up (presently, he's in Korea). Of course, there are some captions in english, and the photos and headlines will give the basic gist of what's said in the articles until full translations can be provided. I would say that I could amass a good amount of references from credible and well known japanese magazines by Monday. AQWIKI (talk) 019:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there, you asked for a day and I gave it a week but nothing has been forthcoming with respect to this article so I have sent it to AfD. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- My apologies for the delays. For the time being, I've got the magazine scans.
- Hi there, you asked for a day and I gave it a week but nothing has been forthcoming with respect to this article so I have sent it to AfD. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I can easily gather old interviews and magazine references (I have scans as well, if thats any help), but actual translations are out of my power until my japanese-speaking friend shows up (presently, he's in Korea). Of course, there are some captions in english, and the photos and headlines will give the basic gist of what's said in the articles until full translations can be provided. I would say that I could amass a good amount of references from credible and well known japanese magazines by Monday. AQWIKI (talk) 019:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Every one on this list has scans of them in magazines, most of them being tour reports and interviews. http://morgianasama.livejournal.com/tag/gargoyle.
I believe this is an interview with Kiba (the vocalist) from a japanese music magazine (its very recent, after the release of their latest album). http://www.sidemilitia.com/gargoyle.html
Not sure what use this'll be of, but it's an online archive from a band archive type thing. http://www22.big.or.jp/~yunisan/vi/gargoyle.html
They band members (other than She-Ja) have also been on a few television dramas, though I'm not sure if it was as guest appearances or as guest stars. The shows in question are 天才てれびくん、天才てれびくんMAX(NHK教育)and 天才てれびくんシリーズのドラマ. Kiba appeared on the show(s) in 1997, 1998 and 2006 (playing different roles, if I understood correctly). The other band members appeared on the show in 1998 as well, presumably on the same episode, playing vampires. References may have to be taken from the japanese wikipedia article on said shows, as the english wikipedia does not have one. http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%A9%E6%89%8D%E3%81%A6%E3%82%8C%E3%81%B3%E3%81%8F%E3%82%93%E3%82%B7%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BA%E3%81%AE%E3%83%89%E3%83%A9%E3%83%9E
I'm unsure of the relevance of the source itself, but there's a good deal of information on recent activities on shattered-tranquility.net, which I'm aware has been used as a source here for other artists and articles. One article includes information about them touring with NOIZ, or http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Uchuu_Sentai_NOIZ for clarification. http://shattered-tranquility.net/index.php/tags/gargoyle/
They are also currently touring with Sex Machineguns, though again I'm not sure of how much relevance this gives. Touring schedule is seen here: http://www.sexmachineguns.com/live.html#0606
I don't own all of these obviously, but here's a list of magazines that the band have appeared in recently. Copies would have to be secured for verification of course, but I have no reason to doubt the band's official website. http://firstcell.net/gargoyle/media/magazine.html
Kentaro (as well as Toshi) are endorsed by Greco guitars, a japanese electric guitar company. They're listed on the Kanda Shokai website, if proof is needed (http://www.kandashokai.co.jp/greco/). Kentaro also does instructional presentations and similar events, also endorsed by Greco Zemaitis (http://www.shimokura-guitar.com/kentaro.html, http://www.shimokura-guitar.com/kentaro.html).
My apologies if any of these aren't of use. AQWIKI (talk) 19:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Page has been deleted yet again. AQWIKI (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
My apologies for not getting back to your reply sooner, I have been away at a conference and have had only sporadic internet access. The Page was deleted at WP:AFD I am curious why you did not participate in the discussion there or add these references to the article in an attempt to keep it? -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- By the time I checked the page it had already been deleted. I've not added them because I'm rather busy as is, I just sort of add to this page in my spare time. I suppose that will have to change if it is restored, however... AQWIKI (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
War of the Independents restored
This article has been restored after its deletion was contested. As you nominated the article to be deleted via WP:PROD, you may wish to nominate the article for a full deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up I have sent it to AFD. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thought you might. :) Since I've already acted on this in an admin capacity, I don't think I should take part in any way, but I'll be watching it with interest. I couldn't find any reliable sources on it myself, and while the author asserts that it has come out in mini-series form, I couldn't verify that. The official website doesn't even seem to be there anymore. Some chatter about it here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- I found the same sources. I noticed that while contesting the PROD the author claims that the miniseries came out but I could not find a single review or even announcement for the projects release. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 19:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- No, me, either. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- I found the same sources. I noticed that while contesting the PROD the author claims that the miniseries came out but I could not find a single review or even announcement for the projects release. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 19:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thought you might. :) Since I've already acted on this in an admin capacity, I don't think I should take part in any way, but I'll be watching it with interest. I couldn't find any reliable sources on it myself, and while the author asserts that it has come out in mini-series form, I couldn't verify that. The official website doesn't even seem to be there anymore. Some chatter about it here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome
Hey RP459,
I appreciate the welcome and the cookies. I almost thought it was an anonymous response - you're quick on your feet! (hands?) I'm not quite ready to do any major contributions to the community, but fixing vandalism and minor edits, sourcing, etc. shouldn't be a problem.
WildRyc (talk) 19:19, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Your welcome for the cookies :) I like to welcome any registered user who edits an article that is my watchlist. If you need help with anything please feel free to leave a message here. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Japanese battleship Sagami
- This was posted to my user page and I have moved it here... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm quite confused, because I don't recall ever adding
to Japanese battleship Sagami -- or indeed ever even going to that article.
Speaking for whoever did, though, the obvious reason to me is that she was sunk by mines laid by a U-boat. The Uboat template includes "Capital ships sunk by U-boats".
Maybe you know that but are wondering why a ship sunk by mines is being included, and I suspect that that is because the template does not specify "torpedoed by" a U-boat; it merely says "sunk by", and "sunk by" can be easily and logically be interpreted as including mines laid by the submarine. On the other hand, one can argue that the ship was sunk by a mine, not literally by a U-boat. Anyway, the reasons for confusion are pretty obvious to me.
Do whatever you want, though, I don't really care that much one way or the other.Mdnavman (talk) 21:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)mdnavman
- No problem This is the edit I was referring to... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ah! That solves the mystery. The reason I did it is because the Uboat template lists Russian battleship Peresviet as one of the capital ships sunk by a U-boat. So I clicked on the link at the template and added the Uboat template to the article it links to (without noticing it was Sagami). I added Uboat to the article for the sake of consistency, because all of the other capital ships listed as sunk in the Uboat template have the Uboat template in their articles, and it does not make sense that only Peresviet would not.
- So the bottom line is that the article that "Russian battleship Preserviet" in the Uboat template links to is "Japanese battleship Sagami," which used to be Peresviet, which the template says a U-boat sank. So, if you disagree with adding the template to Sagami, you also will need to go in and fix the Uboat template itself, because the other capital ships listed in the template do have the Uboat template in their articles. But before you do that, you also probably should bring up the matter in some Wiki form somewhere, because all the other capital ships listed in the Uboat template have the Uboat template in their articles -- I did not put them all there, I just noticed the pattern -- and by deleting the Uboat template from Sagami you would make her article the only one about a capital ship sunk by a U-boat without the Uboat template included. Mdnavman (talk) 22:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)mdnavman
- I understand now. I have added it back in. Thanks! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:44, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Albums
Hi, why not wait until the Senmuth deletion discussion turns out before checking albums, you possibly make yourself unnecessary work. Best Hekerui (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Good point if the main article is deleted then the albums could be speedy deleted. If the main article is kept then then the redirects can be made... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 16:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Uncategorized page?
You incorrectly added the "uncategorized" tag on Bolton Council election, 2010, which I've now removed. When I created the page I did added it to three categories. HLE (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- My apologies I was using KISSLE for the 1st time and it was not showing categories on the display. I will have to be more careful. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 19:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank You for the Welcome!
--HeatherKay7 (talk) 19:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Your welcome -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 21:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Cristián Berríos
- Diego Grez has been cautioned for libel against Cristian Berrios, who has no account with his name in wikipedia. It is a personal pursuit against a person who does not appear in the records of wikipedia.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_of_Cristi%C3%A1n_Berr%C3%ADos_and_sockpuppets —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.202.110.170 (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
CV COs
OK--did not know. I will make the appropriate separate pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwood1957 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Muir Skate
FYI, they were featured in this international magazine, volume 6 issue 4, on page 31. [1] PÆonU (talk) 02:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
UAA
Note, you can't use UAA to report an already blocked editor; even if the block is temporary, the bot will think that the request is a mistake and automatically remove it. In this case, he's already being discussed at ANI, so I think it's best to leave it there. —Soap— 17:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- I saw (I did not actually know that the bot would remove so I learned something today :) ) and another admin is discussing the username with the user... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 17:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Citation Requested
You added a significant portion to the Fourth generation (A4, MK4, Typ 1J) Testing and Review section for the Volkswagen Jetta regarding ride height and front bumper problems. Specifically, you added the following information "Drivers complained that the front fender does not have adequate ground clearance to clear a curb in a parking space." This information is not common knowledge; in fact, I wouldn't guarantee that this information is even regarded as accurate in groups who are familiar with the car, yet the language that you've used is suggestive of a wide-spread, documented design flaw. Could you please cite a reliable source for this information such as Consumer Reports or another credible reporting agency? Perhaps a thorough report has been published comparing ride heights of several cars of the same size class. I suspect, however, that the source of your information is rooted in bias; the typical compact car in this class will sustain similar damage from driving over most parking barriers if the driver is unskilled enough to do so. A citation would clear up the validity of this information.
- I have added [citation needed] to the section that you mentioned, however I think you have me mixed up with someone else, I cannot ever remember editing Volkswagen Jetta. Feel free to remove the section of disputed text if a citation is not forthcoming. BTW do you have the diff where this was added? -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 16:40, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Thought you might be interested
as your name was mentioned in User_talk:PÆon#Misleading_comment_placement. Toddst1 (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing that, we both understood that I was agreeing with you. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 01:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome
I got your welcome, and thanks, for the cookies too.
It's nick to see somebody noticed I'm here.
I am not likely to contribute much, other than an occasional correction.
--RobinInTexas (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- If you ever have any trouble feel free to leave a message here and if I cannot help you I will find someone who can. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 14:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
RP459 - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.
I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.
Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.
Thank you! 7 15:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the cookies
Thank you, the welcome cookies look tasty. I've been submitting edits for years, but finally got my own login for some reason. I think it's because I wanted to make a new page, instead of simple edits/corrections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flerchjj (talk • contribs) 04:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
~~Hello - and a request for help~~
Thank you for your welcome note.
I've just added a bit to the entry on Naoko Mori, giving the transmission date of Lennon Naked, in which the actress plays Yoko Ono. However, I can't figure out how to include the external link that confirms this, so if you are able to do this for me please I would very much appreciate it. The link is as follows: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/proginfo/tv/2010/wk25/thu.shtml#thu_lennon
Thanks.
Kind regards.
Cybersub (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have added the ref please have a look at what I did to add it in this link [2]. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
~~Thank you~~
Hi there,
Thank you for adding the reference and for showing me how to do it in future - much appreciated and most helpful.
Best wishes,
Cybersub (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the message but I'am in french wikipédia Utilisateur:Bobodu63,
Best wishes --Bobodu63 (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC) and I can't speak english —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobodu63 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Je parle francais si vous desierer comuniqe... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 20:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- ah c'est bien ça,
- Je voulais savoir si, c'est le même wikipédia au U.K et aux U.S? --Bobodu63 (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oui, il y a seulment une wikipédia pour chaque langue. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 18:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ok merci! comment sais-tu parler français? --Bobodu63 (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Je vis au Canada :) -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 19:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ok merci! comment sais-tu parler français? --Bobodu63 (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oui, il y a seulment une wikipédia pour chaque langue. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 18:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- ah c'est bien ça,
Frustration...
I've had another couple of removals before with the same excuse that you provided. When I asked for further clarifications, the final reply I got was "... just because others do it, that doesn't mean you can do it...". Essentially this means that if you are an experienced Wikipedia author and can play the system from within, your links can stay. If not, tough...
Every single external link that I have added is giving value to the article and I stand behind this 100%, I dare anyone to challenge it. Would this help my website? Yes it would but it would also direct people to information that is useful and closely related to the article. For crying out loud, the A380 page has two groups of links, one to flightglobal.com and one to Airbus. Do you know what the title of the flightglobal links is called??? Everything about the A380 at FlightGlobal.com. If this is not pushy promotion I don't know what is.... Why the hell hasn't someone killed the flightglobal links......????? It's a commercial site and it will benefit from the traffic. Why is it so different if I put a link in the A380 page leading to a database with professional, accurate and up to date info on orders, deliveries, list prices, used prices and even lease rates!!!??? You can get this data in a single database only if you pay a hefty subscription..... we're giving it for Free!!!
Just for once, I would like someone to provide a proper explanation why SPAM related rules were written for wikipedia when the vast majority of aviation people are ignoring them. Pls don't say that I'm exaggerating, the articles are there, it would take me just a few minutes to send you at least 10-15 improper external links.... Wikipedia is supposed to be a place where people help each other with data and information. Safeguarding selected data and information is simply saying that some pigs are more equal than others, that's not right...
Pls accept my apologies for the tone, it has nothing to do with you personally!!!
Take care Aegn3 (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I understand your frustration and I would direct you to WP:EL. Wikipedia is not perfect and neither are it's editors. External links are a very tricky issue and I hear your frustration. Links that do not belong on Wikipedia tend to slip into articles one at a time. Allot of the time they are placed there by well meaning editors who do not understand WP:EL and the policies involved. These external links tend to collect and then be removed on mass when an editor notices them. I do not however agree that established editors get preferential treatment. If I add spam links I would expect them to be removed.
- I would suggest to you another option to just this site. If it passes WP:RS then why not add it as a reference to facts in an article. In my experience many external links that belong could be references in an article people just have not added them yet.
- As for other articles having links in them that do not belong my advice is to have a look at Be Bold feel free to fix it, if you don't why would anyone else... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank spam!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TFOWR 20:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Seeking advice
Dear RP459, Thank you for getting in touch. I am still a real novice on Wikipedia and I wonder if you could advise me on two matters:
1. Over the past few years I have logged in with Wikipedia a number of times using various usernames and passwords - all of which I have promptly forgotten. Last time I made a number of tentative minor edits with "Laminateflooring" as either my username or password, but I can't remember which. Is there a way to find out, or perhaps hould all my various usernames & passwords be deleted? If so, how do I go about it?
2. When browsing random articles, I came across a short article entitled "Heartstone", which apparently is a novel by CJ Sansom. However,the article states the book is not due out until the summer of 2010. Amazon UK state they do not know if or when they will stock it. The article appears to me to be blatant advertising for a forthcoming book. Is this the sort of article that should be recommended for deletion? I've tried looking up the Wiki advice on this but find it a bit bewildering. Could you just give me a brief idiot's guide on how to do this?
Thank you
--L2gHO5c29w (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sure! Ok for number one if you do not remember both the username and password you are pretty much out of luck. If you remember the username but not the password you can request a password to be emailed from the login screen. My advice would likely be to just leave these accounts and start fresh with the one you are using now. One thing to note is WP:ILLEGIT you want to be careful not to seem as supporting discussions that were made by previous accounts that you participated in. As for number two I have WP:PROD'd the article as I completely agree with you that the article should be deleted. A good place to look for info about the deletion process is WP:BEFORE and WP:AFD. I proposed the article for deletion which means that if after 7 days no one has removed the tag (contested the deletion) an admin can delete the article. If someone does remove the tag then I would take it to articles for deletion (depinding on their rationale for keeping the article as I may have missed something), but the prod process helps cut down on the discussions at AFD... You may want to look at WP:TWINKLE it is a useful script that helps with proding and AFDing... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
New Page
I'm creating a page for my US Army unit and our distinguished mascot and moniker. I wrote substantial information before saving the page. We are currently in Iraq again and, while I was away on a mission, much of what I had written was deleted, specifically the reference to the documentary we were in (Baker Boys: Inside the Surge). Upon return from our mission, I began editing our page, adding a list of operations we engaged in while deployed. All that information was also deleted. I'm confused as to why this information has been deleted, considering this platoon, and the unit we are in, is the source of the information. Moreover, the documentary, Baker Boys: Inside The Surge, is quite a viable source of information. Do you require text/literature-only sources as opposed to documentary/film and live sources? Also, to avoid deletion prior to completion of the page, is there a way to add information over time to complete the page prior to saving it all as a page? Because of our current deployment status, this matter is quite frustrating. I'm upset because the time I took to add the information was deleted moments later. Thank you for you assistance and cooperation, Bullmoosebell (talk) 02:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- I understand your frustration I have posted some advice on your talk page. I understand that you are new but please understand that articles on Wikipedia need to pass WP:NOTABILITY. Please do not take that to mean what you and your platoon is not notable. Of course you guys are! Every soldier deserves respect and recognition but unfortunately there is a minimum threshold for encyclopedia inclusion. Wikipedia has a ton of rules, I learn new ones almost every day and I have been editing for years do please do not take this experience the wrong way, start slow learn the process that we have here. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 05:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Where in the rules does it state this platoon does not fit the "threshold for encyclopedia inclusion?" Who is the governing factor to say this platoon is not notable? Our history stretches back from the pivotal battles of the Civil War to the valor of Audie Murphy in WWII to spearheading Operation Thunder Run into Iraq in 2002-2003. 3rd Platoon Baker Company has been featured in many movies (To Hell And Back, Patton, Baker Boys), many books, countless news and magazine articles (I, personally, was featured in Armor magazine and Soldier of Fortune magazine), received many awards and citations, and we have gained international notoriety (again) in-part to our mascot and moniker. How does that not fit the criteria? Simply because our page is a work in progress and all information necessary to satisfy your criteria has not been included yet does not warrant deletion. Whom can I speak with in regard to keeping this page from deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bullmoosebell (talk • contribs) 10:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- The discussion in regards to the deletion is occurring at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Teddy_the_War_God please feel free to participate in the discussion. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 14:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
The page I am trying to create is very personal to many people, thus it is personal to me as well. Because of that I find my frustrations being vented in a personal manner. I did not intend to appear frustrated with you personally. I understand you volunteer for this task of protecting Wikipedia from random irrelevant articles. For that I thank you. Keep up the good work ensuring correct protocol posture on Wikipedia. Bullmoosebell (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- No worries I have not taken it personally. I have stepped back from this situation to avoid inflaming it as I see that others are helping you out with your questions and concerns. Good luck and stay safe in Iraq! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
RfA
Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- When nominating a category for deletion, please tag it with a {{subst:cfd}} to the category page. This should alert users viewing the category that it's up for deletion.
- Per Wikipedia:Speedy keep, a deletion nomination where the nominator changes his/her mind (when no one else supports deletion) is one of the criteria for speedy keep. In such cases:
- Add {{subst:cfd top|'''Withdrawn'''. ~~~~}} just under the title line (in WP:MFD, over the title line), and {{subst:cfd bottom}} at the end of the section.
- Remove the deletion tag from the category page.
עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! I have never performed a non-admin closure of an XfD. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 00:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank for for the star and kind words. Of course I would make that edit, my word is generally good, I hope. Herostratus (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- It took balls to go through what you just did. That edit was just the final step in an ugly and long road, I would like to think I would have held my head high as you did. If you ever decide you want the bit back you have my support. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 14:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
I think I will need help in the future, I'm trying to get used to the markup. Thank u for teaching me how to sign. I'm tring now :) Oz an (talk) 23:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)oz_an
- Feel free to post here anytime! Glad to be of service. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
RFA Thank spam
--White Shadows There goes another day 17:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Good luck and I meant what I said. I hope to !vote support at the end of September. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 19:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank You For The Exceptional New Commer Award
I really thak u for your award and wait for my calling in the debates that I'm involved. I need your op, after all u r the first (and only one so far) who welcomed me. Thank u and best regards...Oz an (talk) 02:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)oz_an
- Your welcome, the best advice I can give you is to start slow and try to learn as many of the rules as possible. Trust me, that is a really tough task, I learn new things all the time and I have been here for 2 years. WP:VOTE and WP:CANVASS are two really good places to start for discussing changes. Stay onside with them and your halfway on your way, remember interested editors are already watching the talk pages that you are editing... One of the best things about Wikipedia is the links, follow them an you never know where you will end up. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 03:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Dramaout
There is a note on the dramaout page that those who missed it can do it late! Start this week? Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 02:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 06:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
This guy doesn't get it I'm thinking. He has a clear COI too with the username. -MBK004 06:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have posted a COI notice on his page, hopefully he reads it. So far the edits mean well and have expanded the article. I would like to try and work with the editor but am very busy at work... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 15:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Request
Just a small, light-hearted request:
When editing articles, would it be possible to do all of your edits in one sitting, rather than editing one small section at a time, then reading the next and editing that? This stops you flooding edit notifications onto the "View history" page of an article.
Regards, Ready (talk) 17:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly probably not, when I am expanding an article substantially I do this but when I am tagging it with various tags or adding refs I typically do them one at a time. This typically does not flood a page history as I am not typically a content builder (with lots of edits to a page), except for the occasional article which I am trying to expand... Which page was it a problem on? -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 17:28, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- If you have a look at you contributions page, http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/RP459 , you can see what I mean. Notably "Faciat Georgius" on that first page. Ready (talk) 17:39, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks I had a feeling that you meant my edits to that article this morning. The reason I edit the way I do when cleaning up articles is individual problems or thoughts are individual edits. That way if you don't like one of my thoughts or edits it is easy to undo and WP:BEBOLD. Talk to you later. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:21, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough, thanks for replying promptly... happy editing! Ready (talk~~contributions) 22:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome!
I appreciate the kind welcome & offer for help.
I am posting my first major page Faciat Georgius. I would LOVE any help or suggestions. My goal for today is just to post the thing, I plan to go thru and tighten it down over the next couple days.
--KaosDad (talk) 16:40, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Will do, I had a look and one thing that you will need to look at at include is reliable sources to back up this article. Please see WP:RS, otherwise you risk it being deleted on the basis that it does not pass WP:NOTABILITY. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 16:58, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
OK, I am done for the day. Sadly, my references are few as a number of my personal references are no longer available on the internet.
--KaosDad (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- You have had a good day though! Thanks for adding those references, paper ones (not online) are just as good and sometimes better than online ones. I am impressed! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
OK, I think I am done. I have added the last couple of refernces I can and think I have exhausted what little is out there. I have linked the page to Clemens and the Guadalcanal Campaign. I have alerted some folks at the National Museum of the Marine Corps to the page's presence, perhaps the can add some more names. I guess final review & we can take those templates down? Maybe?
--KaosDad (talk) 15:28, 19 July 2010 (UTC) And for my next windmill: The Haitian Distinguished Service Medal. I need a real job. --KaosDad (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have removed the templates that I added along with the under construction one that you added. I agree this article turned out pretty darn good! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 18:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for all your help & support!!!!! --KaosDad (talk) 19:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, keep up the good work. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the warm welcome!
Hi RP459, just wanted to say thank you for your welcoming message and the lovely cookies in there! I'll be sure to ask you if I have questions about editting. I'm also Canadian, by the way. Tonyshawk (talk) 00:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for your question! I'm glad somebody asked that. :) --j⚛e deckertalk 03:29, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Your welcome, and thanks for the great answer to my question. After reading your answer I was happy to add my support to your RfA. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thanks for the welcome
Thanks for the welcome, RP. And the cookies (HA, HA!)
And now I know I have my own talk page.
Daisom (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thanks for saying "hi"!
The virtual cookies are a nice touch. HoveBrighton (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
RfA thanks spam
Hello RP459, thank you for supporting my RfA!
I was promoted with a final tally of 65/4/3.
I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations, do my best for Wikipedia, and take to heart the constructive criticism. Always feel free to message me if I'm around.
Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
RP, thanks for the support vote. You must have realised this is not a thank spam as I thought I should personally thank you for the RfA vote. My sincere regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 07:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
It appears that you have !voted twice - once in the Support column, and once in the Neutral column. Can you please strike out (or indent) one of these !votes? Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that I did not strike out my support when I moved to neutral, I have fixed it now... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. A Horse called Man 19:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom voting system RFC.
Heads up about an RfC
Please note that there's a new discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure in which you may wish to comment. It is expected to close in about a week. You have received this message because you participated in a similar discussion (2009 AC2 RfC) last year. Roger talk 05:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
I'm so grateful to you for the welcome and the cookies. Thank you very much. Rkhb225 (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
~~ A small request ~~
--Zombiie sex (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)I really do not know how this works since I'm new and only sixteen, but I was wondering if a word that was mispelled in the World War 2" article should be corrected. I would do it but i don't understand how. The word is in the first paragraph, and the last word of the second sentence. The word is "mobilised", but I'm sure you know it should be "mobilized". Since I saw that you have editted the article quite a lot I thought you wouldn't mind..hopefully. Also I apologize if I didn't do the heading right. Well thank you for taking the time to read this!
Zombiiesex--Zombiie sex (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Actually what is going on there is that the US spelling (I am a bad speller myself) is being used in this article per WP:SPELLING. Essentially what happens in and article (the above link explains it better) is that when and article is started using British or US spelling then it typically stays in that format resulting in what you are seeing here... Hope that helps and welcome to Wikipedia! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 01:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Kyron
FYI - I have started a new article, Disappearance of Kyron Horman, which you may be interested in since you voted to keep Kyron Horman in the last AfD. I believe that an article about the event itself would not fail WP:BLP1E like the original biographical article on the victim did. There is a ton of coverage, so sources are not a problem. Feel free to add to the article if you like. Thanks! SnottyWong communicate 23:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 19:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to take part in a study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in this article. I undid your edit, since I intend to use most if not all the reference you edited out. Please wait a couple of days before interfering in my work. Bouchecl (talk) 12:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks for the heads up! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Just a follow up, it has been a few months so I have (re-)removed the section in question... -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 17:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey RP459, thanks for your inputs regarding my talk page. I found it very useful !!!
Happy Editing!!!! Wå§ïm Mðgål 16:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasimmogal2007 (talk • contribs)
- Your Welcome! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 16:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
My RfA
I just wanted to take a minute to thank you very much for supporting me in my recent RfA. Even though it was unsuccessful, I appreciate your trust. With much gratitude, jsfouche ☽☾Talk 02:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:USS Jupiter - Langley.JPG
A tag has been placed on File:USS Jupiter - Langley.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, I don't deal with images much... From reading CSD-F2 are you just saying that the same image exists on the commons (which it does) and it is not necessary to host the same image on English Wikipedia? If that is the case will you update the link to the image from the commons on the articles which use this image USS_Langley_(CV-1)? Thanks! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 17:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- If the names are identical, there should be no need to update the links, because the Commons version will show through :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks I did not know that! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 21:25, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Red Link Recovery
Hello. As a French-speaking WikiGnome, I'd like to solicit your help in testing a new tool. For a few years now, the Red Link Recovery Project has been using the Red Link Recovery Live tool to track down and fix unnecessarily red links in articles. Recently, the tool has been expanded to work on non-English Wikipedias. A small set of suggested fixes for red-links on the French-language Wikipedia have been prepared and I'm hoping to interest some French-language speakers (such as yourself) to work through them.
If you are interested, please visit http://toolserver.org/~tb/RLRL/quick.php?lang=fr. Each time you refresh the page you'll be presented with three new suggested fixes. I'll be happy to answer any questions on the tools talk page. - TB (talk) 17:58, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Very cool, I will see what I can do. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 05:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- Super Cool! I have started to use it. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 05:52, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
IGKT
Hi Many thanks for your sympathetic reply. We have been made aware that, under Data Protection rules, we cannot make personal details available generally. We have discontinued publication of our membership booklet for just this reason. The listing can now only be obtained from the website behind a password. The structure of this is currently being improved. I'm sure many of our members would be happy to help by contributing to your project. Do you think I could give a general invitation to participate in the next edition of our journal? Best wishes for the continued success of Wikipedia - possibly the best invention in the world! Colin
PS please reply directly to colin@byfleet.org if you are able. Colinbyfleet (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks but I think you are looking for User_talk:Dfred not me. I just welcomed you to Wikipedia. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 18:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Pointer to reply
RP459, thanks for pointing me to the above reply. --Dfred (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 19:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your support at my RfA. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
My RFA
Hi, I just wanted to leave a note saying thank you for partcipating in my RFA, and your comments will be taken on board and acted upon. Hopfully, I will be of a level you can support in a future RFA. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 13:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for !voting
at my successful RFA | |
Thank you, RP459, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Wikipedia's labours. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
My RfA
Thank you for participating in my RfA, I really appreciate it. =)
I hope I'll be able to retain the confidence you've bestowed upon me there in the months to come. Take care. Master&Expert (Talk) 00:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, this article is being discussed for deletion. Since you have contributed to it you may be interested in taking part to the discussion. ZipoBibrok5x10^8 (talk) 19:10, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
RfA: thank you for your support
Thank you for your support during my RfA, RP. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
?
Why am I recieving messages about changes I've made to a wikipedia article being reverted when I have not made any changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.178.22.188 (talk) 03:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- That would have been someone else using your IP adress back in 2009, feel free to ignore it. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 16:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Eleanor Tomlinson filmography
Hello. I've added the broadcast year (2015), programme title (Poldark) and character name (Demelza) to Eleanor Tomlinson's filmography - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Eleanor_Tomlinson - but for some reason the whole table has jumped to beneath the external links section and its width has expanded. It looked fine on preview, so I'm not sure what has gone wrong. Sorry. Can someone fix it please? Hopefully it's a minor thing to sort out. Apologies again. Many thanks. Cybersub (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Looks like I've managed to fix it. Hurray! Cybersub (talk) 06:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2014
- Traffic report: TMZedia
- WikiCup: 2014 WikiCup enters round three
- In the media: Google and the flu; Adrianne
- WikiProject report: Singing with Eurovision
- Featured content: Wikipedia at the Rijksmuseum
The Signpost: 14 May 2014
- Investigative report: Hong Kong's Wikimania 2013—failure to produce financial statement raises questions of probity
- WikiProject report: Relaxing in Puerto Rico
- Featured content: On the rocks
- Traffic report: Eurovision, Google Doodles, Mothers, and 5 May
- Technology report: Technology report needs editor, Media Viewer offers a new look
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2014
- News and notes: "Crisis" over Wikimedia Germany's palace revolution
- Featured content: Staggering number of featured articles
- Traffic report: Doodles' dawn
The Signpost: 09 July 2014
- Special report: Wikimania 2014—what will it cost?
- Wikimedia in education: Exploring the United States and Canada with LiAnna Davis
- Featured content: Three cheers for featured pictures!
- News and notes: Echoes of the past haunt new conflict over tech initiative
- Traffic report: World Cup, Tim Howard rule the week
The Signpost: 16 July 2014
- Special report: $10 million lawsuit against Wikipedia editors withdrawn, but plaintiff intends to refile
- Traffic report: World Cup dominates for another week
- Wikimedia in education: Serbia takes the stage with Filip Maljkovic
- Featured content: The Island with the Golden Gun
Merge discussion for Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission
An article that you have been involved in editing, Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sohebbasharat (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 July 2015
- News and notes: Training the Trainers; VP of Engineering leaves WMF
- In the media: EU freedom of panorama; Nehru outrage; BBC apology
- WikiProject report: Able to make a stand
- Featured content: Viva V.E.R.D.I.
- Traffic report: We're Baaaaack
- Technology report: Technical updates and improvements
Hey
I saw that you're a Scots speaker, would you be interested in contributing to the Scots Wikipedia? We're always in need of new volunteers. I'm an active contributor there and I'd be glad to show you around. :) --AmaryllisGardener talk 18:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
- Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?
- Tech news: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
- Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption
- Traffic report: Reality is for losers
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Wishing you all the best . . .
Merry Christmas, RP, and may your holidays be merry and bright . . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks and Merry Christmas to you too! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
78.26's RFA Appreciation award
The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
Unfair treatment to the article Dew computing
Dear senior editor: I made some modifications to an article Dew computing, and an editor reverted it to the previous version. First commented with 'spam' then with COI. After I posted my opinion about the editor's reverting in the talk page, few hours after, this editor nominated deletion of this article without point out the reasons. This is not a fair and rational action. This reaction to my post is full of personal power over me. I ask your help in checking this situation. Ywangupeica (talk) 23:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- In the media: Washington Post continues in-depth Wikipedia coverage
- Wikicup: WikiCup winners
- Discussion report: What's on your tech wishlist for the coming year?
- Technology report: New guideline for technical collaboration; citation templates now flag open access content
- Featured content: Cream of the crop
- Traffic report: Un-presidential politics
- Arbitration report: Recapping October's activities
New deal for page patrollers
Hi RP459,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
List of current Russian Navy ships
Hi. As you did the last edit on this page, would you please consider adding the Admiral Gorshkov class frigates to the list. I don't have the technical know-how to do this. Thanks 212.159.79.82 (talk) 11:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians
Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community