User talk:Qwerty 9706

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hi Qwerty 9706, welcome to Wikipedia! I saw your question at the Teahouse and thought I'd drop you a personal message. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to write me. Happy editing! Broc (talk) 13:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Broc Thank you so much, that's very kind of you. I will take into account all your suggestions Qwerty 9706 (talk) 13:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your TFD nomination for User:UBX/Juve Merda

I have procedurally closed your nomination for User:UBX/Juve Merda as user boxes (despite being a type of template) are nominated and discussed at WP:MFD. If you still want to nominate this user box for deletion, please make a new nomination at WP:MFD. -- Whpq (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update - the discussion is now here -> Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Juve Merda. -- Whpq (talk) 18:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwerty 9706 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will first explain that I understand why I was blocked, then that I admit my errors and so that the block is no longer necessary. This account was first blocked on Italian Wikipedia for block evasion, my first account (Calicanto2023) was blocked due to the fact I mostly did minor edits which sometimes were inaccurate and had to be reverted. After I got blocked, I decided to create accounts to evade the block, as I believed it was excessive. Now I understand this has been my first huge mistake. I now know that this strongly reduced unblock chances. However, in the mean time, I started to collaborate constructively with the English Wikipedia, because I was told that it could help the chances of unblock on itwiki. I did over 5000 edits on enwiki, but my requests were still ignored on itwiki, probably due to my extensive socking. So I tried to convince them via English Wikipedia, in particular, in a moment of desperation and lack of judgement, I left an encrypted message whilst unlogged. Mainly for that reason I got blocked also there. So – and this has been another huge mistake – I felt rejected by the community and started regularly disrupting project pages. However, with the passing of time, I wanted more and more to come back as a good editor. I acknowledged my mistakes. From some time, I desperately would want to go back in time, and not evade the block, when there were still unblock chances. But I knew it wasn't possible, and to reject this thought I continued disruption. And today, I was somehow illuminated: I randomly found a forum of blocked users, and they suggested me that I still could come back. I would desperately like to speak with some of you to explain my feelings, I feel terrible for everything I did, but, as long as I'm blocked, I can't get out of this desperate situation. I don't want to vandalise. If I did so at the Teahouse or in other pages it was due to the desperate feeling I explained before. If I could go back in time, I wouldn't evade firstly the block on itwiki, nor I would start disruption here. I know for you it is difficult to consider my request, but you never know. Please give me a chance. You have nothing to lose.Qwerty 9706 (talk) 18:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I suggest that your best chance of an unblock is take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no block evasion. PhilKnight (talk) 19:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Qwerty 9706 (talk) 18:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cf. User:14_novembre Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PhilKnight Ok, I will consider that. Qwerty 9706 (talk) 19:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The master is banned, so this is not a simple evasion and cannot be overturned by a simple appeal. This continued socking is evidence that the ban is still appropriate. DMacks (talk) 20:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]