User talk:Quickwash

SecureSMS is Trademark of CellTrust Corporation and you have no right to use that term or create a page under it. It is suggested you create a page such as Encrypted Messaging, etc. to introduce your M.Sc. thesis. It seems you are making false claims about being the first inventor of a secured sms protocol. For example an article on end-to-end secure sms has been published on November 2007 by scientist in South Africa, almost a year before your paper was presented to IEEE. Also commercial products have been available to provide end-to-end and server to handset secured sms. Please see discussion page for more details. Shayanrm (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to you and your company (CellTrust):
I never told that I have invented the Secure SMS Messaging for the first time but I have created SSMS which is a Secure SMS Messaging protocol that was composed and submitted in 2007 (See the Call for paper of that conference if you know that what is usual in international conferences where the papers may be submitted 1 year before their presentation for peer-reviewing by the experts). However, you are claiming that your company (CellTrust) is the first creator of Secure SMS Messaging while we know that there are many schemes presented in previous years while the only proofs by your company is a news published by Reuters in Feb. 2008.
You mentioned another paper but your mentioned paper has been published in Computers & Security Journal (Volume 27) at October 2008, Pages 154-167! I already found that they have also presented it as a 1-page poster in a domestic conference in 2005. They have obviously used the words "Secure SMS" in 2005 which you claim to be inventor of it in 2008. This is another proofs against your claims to be the first inventor of Secure SMS which is indicated by yourself!
Regardless, your claimed trademark is SecureSMS (a single word). It is not "Secure SMS" (two words) and it differs from SSMS, SMSSec, and SafeSMS that are proposed over the years. Ok. We will not use your SecureSMS but we will use "Secure SMS" everywhere we want and no one can prevent us from using such general words in context.
At end, I advice you to change your manner of conduct, as I found in your talk page that you are threading other people without having adequate proofs and justifications. If your trademark is SecureSMS, you should know that no one has used your SecureSMS. Furthermore, your SecureSMS uses RSA and traditional cryptography while our SSMS is based on Elliptic Curve cryptography and signcryption.
The other thing is that you did not created any page for your claimed SecureSMS but you are vandalising other scientific pages and threading other people. Quickwash (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article SSMS, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Secure SMS Messaging Protocol, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]