User talk:QDJ22

Welcome!

Hello, QDJ22!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Theroadislong (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marius Andrei Feder (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marius Andrei Feder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DaxServer, Thanks for the feedback I will go through all what you have mentioned thoroughly and resubmit it if i am able to find solution to it.

Thabks QDJ22 (talk) 18:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QDJ22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QDJ22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Bbb23, You said and i quote that i was blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple account which is totally wrong because i am not new to wiki and i understand Wikipedia policy and guideline, if not all, at least 60%.

I urge you to check again because i don't use multiple account, Thanks. QDJ22 (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I checked, and I think Bbb23 is correct. It could be that this is meat puppetry and not sock puppetry, but that is treated the same. 331dot (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QDJ22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The administrators are claiming that i am using multiple account which i have already stated that i am not and i don't know why and what is the reason for this. Is my editing the same with someone? Am i using the same name with someone? Is it IP address or what because i don't understand all this. i believe this is just guessing or suspecting and I can't take this because I am not guilty. Pleases rectify this QDJ22 (talk) 07:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Reviewing the edits in question, I would agree that this is clear meatpuppetry, and the block is warranted. Also, this is not "defamation". RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I am yet to receive a response from anyone for the past 4daysQDJ22 (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may have only one unblock request open at a time. I've converted your second one, which is really a comment anyway, into a comment.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by second one? I said I have only one account which is this

This is Defamation and I can't tolerate it. Be careful of your action and words towards me, You don't have right to be accusing like this because you don't own Wikipedia, W are all editors and contributors. QDJ22 (talk) 14:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QDJ22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You said this is not a defamation but meatpuppetry, can you prove that? Because i am the user of this account not you and i still dont get why you keep insisting on this as if you are me or the user of the account and claiming to be right when you are wrong QDJ22 (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason to think the admins had it wrong. Drmies (talk) 21:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review this, but there are two possibilities here:

That this is sockpuppetry and you have used multiple accounts
That this is meatpuppetry, which means that you may have only used one account, but that you have done exactly the same thing that others have been blocked for. Since we have no way to know who is on the other end of the internet operating the account, or (for example) if you have been recruited by blocked users, we must treat it as sockpuppetry.

If you deny using multiple accounts(which every sock does, but setting that aside...) then this must be meat puppetry, so you will need to tell us how you came to edit about the subjects that you did, and tell us what edits you intend to make going forward. 331dot (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot, I don't accept both Sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry because i have never/will never use multiple account because i see no reason to do so. Then Meatpuppetry, I don't think i have ever edit a page i didn't create myself except the page that Wikipedia suggest for improvement to new user when you open an account.

And about my edit, The page i edited/created was a request from my community and i don't think i will have more page to edit later on unless i am less busy and i feel like contributing to Wikipedia and my edit will be the page Wikipedia suggest for improvement or my community suggest. QDJ22 (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re "The page i edited/created was a request from my community"- that's meat puppetry, especially if those who made the request were blocked. 331dot (talk) 17:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TBH I don't know if the person is a user on Wikipedia talkless of being a blocked user because the request wasn't like someone that is an editor. QDJ22 (talk) 17:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @331dot I just read and understand Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Meatpuppetry which I wasn't aware of it before, I accept it, and I will take precautions in future editing/contributing to Wikipedia in order to avoid violating this/any policy. QDJ22 (talk) 04:48, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may make a new request for someone to review. 331dot (talk) 08:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QDJ22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read and understand meat puppetry which I wasn't aware of it before, I accept it, and I will take precautions in future editing/contributing to Wikipedia in order to avoid violating this/any policy. I urge you to consider my request QDJ22 (talk) 09:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you do not intend to make any edits, there is no reason to lift the block. Come back once you can actually provide details on what you intend to do. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you give some examples of the edits you intend to make if unblocked? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Rosguill I am not sure of what my future edits might be because my edits are occasionally not frequently but i am sure i will make edit in the future and i wont want a situation whereby i am unable to make make edits anytime in the future because my account is blocked which is why i am requesting for unblock. Also, I will make sure my future edits don't bring any controversy and will adhere to Wikipedia polices and guidelines if i am unblocked.

Hello @Seraphimblade, as i said before, i will make edits and contribute to the encyclopedia because it is something i love doing but i am just taking some time off at the moment to through Wikipedia policy and guidelines again in order to understand Wikipedia very well and avoid situation like this because i don't like it. I will contribute and make edits on place, person and other things.

I don't think it is right to come and ask for unblock when next i want to make edit/contribution when i know that it takes days or even weeks to get a reply from administrators talkless of lifting a block. If my block is lifted now, i can make an edit Seraphimblade QDJ22 (talk) 15:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marius Andrei Feder (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No real WP:SECONDARY sourcing to prove the subject is notable. All that is there is social media, clickbait sites. First ref is a press-release?? Press-releases are non-rs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marius Andrei Feder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 08:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marius Andrei Feder

Hello, QDJ22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marius Andrei Feder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marius Andrei Feder

Hello, QDJ22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Marius Andrei Feder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 09:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]