User talk:Protectanimal

Ahold Delhaize

Hello. I just undid your edit to the Ahold Delhaize article because (a) the tone of the writing does not comply with WP:NPOV and (b) the sourcing of the material does not comply with WP:RS. None of this is to say that the material is "wrong." However, it must be properly cited. You also may want to review WP:RSP. ThePhantom65 (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The edits you recently made to the Ahold Delhaize article are based on sourcing from an animal rights group and blogs that do not meet WP:RS. I would strongly urge you to review these policies before making additional edits to this or any other page. ThePhantom65 (talk) 08:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. A level 2 warning is warranted since the the previous warning is about a similar edit made on another page. – robertsky (talk) 11:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EmilyEquitas, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

– robertsky (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:EmilyEquitas per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EmilyEquitas. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]