User talk:Procidic

Hello!

Welcome to my talk page:D! Here I talk about stuff or you can have a conversation with me!

Hello, Procidic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a dark mode

I have news for you after reading your userpage. If you click "preferences" (which should be near the top of the page unless Vector 2022 put them elsewhere) and then click "gadgets" you can enable dark mode. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 13:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I know everybody loves dark mode and light mode is blinding. It feels better. I have dark mode in a lot of places on my pc. Procidic (talk) 13:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hi Procidic, I'm Stwalkerster. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! stwalkerster (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC) stwalkerster (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright, I just wanted to look cool and stuff. I'm not really good at writing user pages. Procidic (talk) 13:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So far much of your editing has seemed to be more to do with playing around than with making serious contributions to the encyclopaedia; for example, your comments about "joke" articles, and about wishing to "look cool". I suggest you start making small improvements to articles, and leave the play element of editing for now. Editors who don't seem to be here to contribute to the encyclopaedia may be blocked from editing by administrators. JBW (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Air China Flight 403 has been accepted

Air China Flight 403, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clear friend a ^💬 22:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I am going to link it into Air China's article. Procidic (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Air China Flight 183 (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 14 novembre was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia cannot be cite as a source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Air China Flight 183 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 17:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Taiwan. Mr Fink (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Red Sun in the Sky.mp3

Thanks for uploading File:Red Sun in the Sky.mp3. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Procidic (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello Procidic! Your additions to Draft:Air China Flight 183 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Air China Flight 183 (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Air China Flight 183 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Skyshifter. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on MrBeast, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Skyshiftertalk 02:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the hinduistan times was used on the page multiple times. I cited from that source and there is the actual video. *note: video was taken down. This is a reupload https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QwgYW3Mv08* Procidic (talk) 15:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns with Editing

Hey Guys, It's me Procidic. If you are wondering why I keep getting banned for editing or other things, its because I suck at editing and others. My previous account, Gamemode Creative was just a joking wikipedia. I decided to start fresh on this account but Im bad at editing. Im also just a 13 year old kid who wants to edit and I'm not that experienced as you guys. I also am still in education but I think most of you guys are adults. Because of that, I'm not that experienced as you guys and I also can't write good articles and do good edits on wikipedia. I mean several of my writing projects in English Class are good but in wikipedia I suck at Articles. Procidic (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are evading your block on user:Gamemode creative. You need to request an unblcok on that page. Meters (talk) 21:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Procidic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. Why am I considered one? I am not trying to be one Procidic (talk) 22:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You admitted on this very page that you used another account and that you "keep getting banned". That is exactly what sockpuppetry is. The block is on you personally, not just your account. You are not permitted to edit under any account or IP address until the block on your original account is removed. You need to go there and start the process to request unblock. We don't unblock sock accounts. 331dot (talk) 22:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.