User talk:Pro3999

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hilal-e-Pakistan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. INDT (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to HAL AMCA, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ZLEA _T\^C 18:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to WION have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: WION was changed by Pro3999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861452 on 2022-03-24T21:04:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. BilCat (talk) 05:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Your edit here to The Lost City (2022 film) added bad formatting. Please verify your edits with wp:Show preview before publishing. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 04:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 08:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pro3999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my mistake,please forgive me, I was doing test edits, I have done more than 75 good edits,please un block me,I promise I won't repeat any mistakes again.Thank youPro3999 (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The good edits don't make up for the disruption caused by your testing. Please describe the proper places where you can make test edits, and tell the contributions you wish to make going forward. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock} I have done lots of editing in many topics, also I don't know where can i do test editing myself, I would like to keep of doing good in wikipedia, I have done many wikipedia edits with responsibility, if you want you can check that too. Thank you Pro3999 (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pro3999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done lots of editing in many topics, also I don't know where can i do test editing myself, I would like to keep of doing good in wikipedia, I have done many wikipedia edits with responsibility, if you want you can check that too.

Decline reason:

Once you figure it out, but not before, feel free to request an unblock. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pro3999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok now onwards in would do test edits in sand box, I admit my mistake, I'm sorry, you can unblock me whenever you want, I did my job editing with responsibility since last 2 months of joining this editing,and i get one more chance I would put more effort in improvement of wikipedia and that's my promise.Thank you. Pro3999 (talk) 11:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pro3999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok now onwards i would do test edits in sand box, I admit my mistake, I'm sorry, you can unblock me whenever you want, I did my job of editing with responsibility since last 2 months of joining this editing,and i get one more chance I would put more effort in improvement of wikipedia and that's my promise.Thank youPro3999 (talk) 13:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not the only account you've used for hoaxes and vandalism. As expected, User:Wiki pro boss king legend and User:Biulcatat are Confirmed socks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pro3999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My friend,just look the time i did that last. Atleast i solved the vandalism didn't let be there. Only a guy who has some kind of intrest in edit does it. If you want you can grand me one more chance and i would do my job well or please dont ban me permanent,I admit my mistake.i promoise to do my job well if I get another chance. If my objective was just vandalism I wouldn't had made 74 edits and wasted my time. So think of it Thank you. Pro3999 (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't addressed the socking noted above, and frankly after about five declined requests in two days, all saying pretty much the same thing over and over, it's time we all stopped playing this little game and went on to bigger and better things. Talk page access revoked. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]