User talk:Prime Lemur
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Prime Lemur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\talk 08:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Dead links
[edit]Thanks. See WP:Dead links. That should help. Frankly I still haven't figured out where to properly put the archive url if I find one, I'm sure that page or one of the pages mentioned at the top would tell me! You might want to read Help:Referencing for beginners also. Doug Weller talk 16:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Prime Lemur,
Thanks for pinging me last week. (Been away - time of year.) I'm only working on Australian orchids at the moment but looking forward to reading your edits to Neobenthamia. I suggest that the Pridgeon refs. should be removed from the article - it's most unlikely that the editor who listed them has access to them (and is currently blocked anyway). Also very happy to help you with editing plant articles. Gderrin (talk) 20:49, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello again Prime Lemur,
Thanks for your note on Phaius tankervilleae var. australis about "plicate/pleated". I prefer to use everyday language in describing plant morphology - eg. "egg-shaped" instead of "ovate", thereby avoiding links. Instead of "plicate" I used "pleated" but since it's a slightly unusual word, added the WT link. There is a more easily accessed definition of "plicate" here but perhaps it's better not to have a link to "pleated" or "plicate"? All the best of the season and for 2019 to you. Gderrin (talk) 20:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Gderrin I didn't realise it was your edit. No problem. After adding the talk discussion, I reread both descriptions (Wiktionary & leaf morphology on WP), and came to the view that "pleated" was not very clearly described on the leaf morphology page. Nor did the thumbnail image give a good feel for the actual leaf shape under discussion. On a completely different topic, I was planning on working through the article Miltonia. I completed round 1, I estimate it will take another half dozen major edits to complete. The article comes across as very fragmented, with repeated information (even in the lede). Other parts are out of date. You're welcome to place it on your watchlist and let me know if I get anything wrong. I'll go back to that talk page for P. tankervilleae and leave my answer to my own question. Thanks for contacting me! Prime Lemur (talk) 05:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with you about Miltonia being a mess but also like your edits to it. The lead needs tidying up as you say and the headings would be better if in the order given suggested at WP:Plants/Template. I reckon you should be BOLD editing this one. I'm working on Australian orchids at the moment but added Miltonia to my Watchlist. Also happy to help if asked. Gderrin (talk) 07:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks a heap. I bought a N. gracilis (in a poor state) a few months back, and struggled with it for a while. Ditto with a Dockrillia delicophylla (now Den. delicophyllum). They're going fine now. My first stop is often WP, then on to references cited. Obviously some articles are better than others, so I try to use what I've learned to improve the articles. Thanks for advice, much appreciated. Yes, its that time of year, so my activity here is less than usual. I also have a strong interest in the early botanists who described orchids, esp. those who worked in Australia. Being Australian (and speaking 'strine), I'm a monoglot, while so many manuscripts are in other languages (esp German, or worse, Latin). Anyway, enjoy the season. Prime Lemur (talk) 02:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with you about Miltonia being a mess but also like your edits to it. The lead needs tidying up as you say and the headings would be better if in the order given suggested at WP:Plants/Template. I reckon you should be BOLD editing this one. I'm working on Australian orchids at the moment but added Miltonia to my Watchlist. Also happy to help if asked. Gderrin (talk) 07:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- We have much in common. All the best to you too. Gderrin (talk) 04:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central Directorate of the Judicial Police, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Directorate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phosphor bronze, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bearing and Bushing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Saccharopolyspora spinosa
[edit]Thank you for expanding Saccharopolyspora spinosa. Interops (talk) 06:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)