User talk:PrestigiousLynx4378

How to make a articles/pages on English Wikipedia?

Hello, English Wikipedia. I'm PL4378, and i can make only drafts instead articles/pages on English Wikipedia. You can learn me? PrestigiousLynx4378 (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Films

Just to explain for you; for Wikipedia to note that a film was "lost", you need a reliable source that actually says this. It is not enough to say "considered" if it is not explained who considers it. And if those doing the considering are neither notable or authoritative, then their thoughts are irrelevant. This includes random people on the internet. A film can only be "considered lost" if the owners, producers, distributors, and others who might be expected to have a copy, have lost it.

Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AntiFaust (film)

The article AntiFaust (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for film or director/writer. Couldn't be that notable if no known copies existed for many years from the late 20th century.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Falling (2008 film), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antifaust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antifaust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antifaust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Antifaust. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Antifaust, you may be blocked from editing. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Antifaust. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:24, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 12:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, dont delete this article, i'm made a links, and now this is not a orphan.

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Werewolf Hour (1990 film)

The article The Werewolf Hour (1990 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM, is solely dependent on a single source. Noting IMDb is not a reliable or acceptable source (user-generated without independent editorial oversight). It already exists at Draft:The Werewolf Hour (1990 film), where it can be improved and suitable references added.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Werewolf Hour (1990 film)

Hello, PrestigiousLynx4378. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Werewolf Hour (1990 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Werewolf Hour (1990 film)

Hello, PrestigiousLynx4378. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Werewolf Hour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WillyAndScratch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WillyAndScratch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PrestigiousLynx4378. Thank you for your work on Hourglass (film). Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Please note that when translating from other Wikipedias you are required to provide attribution to the original authors, see Help:Translation for details on how to do so.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 11:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willy & Scratch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willy & Scratch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy & Scratch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]