User talk:Pratimatripathy

Welcome!

Hello, Pratimatripathy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 12:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jagannath Temple, Puri, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not change lead sentence. The concept of Mahavishnu came after the Gaudia vaishnavite movement. And this temple existed before that. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me do this, because I am prom puri, india. I know better Pratimatripathy (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pratimatripathy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pratimatripathy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mount Meru. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. there are three religions involved, and they should be listed in alphabetical order as they are in the body of the article. Doing it any other way is a violation of policy. Doug Weller talk 12:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jagannath, you may be blocked from editing. I see no justification for your removal of the source, and please don't use "Lord". Our article on Jesus doesn't call him "Lord Jesus" even though many of his worshippers do. Doug Weller talk 12:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 12:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jagannath. Alivardi (talk) 02:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week from editing Wikipedia articles directly, to prevent you from silently ignoring other users' concerns and edit warring in articles. You are required to discuss changes on the articles' talk page instead of repeatedly making the same change again and again.
Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]