User talk:Praseodymium-141/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Praseodymium-141. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Concern regarding Draft:Unbipentium
Hello, Praseodymium-141. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Unbipentium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Terbium compounds
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Terbium compounds you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of InterstellarGamer12321 -- InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 10:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Just a reminder: over three weeks ago you promised to review Telephone number (mathematics) in Talk:Telephone number (mathematics)/GA1. I'm still waiting for the review. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-oxidation-state
Hallo, your addition to the Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-oxidation-state for thorium is creating a problem in the thorium page. I tried to fix it but I can not see where the problem is.--Stone (talk) 08:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- I know where I went wrong. Thanks for letting me know. 141Pr 10:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've fixed the error. 141Pr 10:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! This sub sub template stuff was a great discussion in the days... and it has it pitfalls. --Stone (talk) 12:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've fixed the error. 141Pr 10:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Group 4 element into Group 5 element. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ok sure, I just ran out of ideas for the article and added some information that was tweaked a little bit. Anyway, if I do do this on a future day, I'll remind myself about it. 141Pr 19:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Niobium into Group 5 element. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- I thought that I had given attribution to the copied content. 141Pr 09:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, yes you did. It was in a subsequent edit. Sorry for the mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 11:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
"Lithium compound" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Lithium compound and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Lithium compound until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 00:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Terbium compounds
The article Terbium compounds you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Terbium compounds for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of InterstellarGamer12321 -- InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 18:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Einsteinium compounds
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Einsteinium compounds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://colloidalfrere.blogspot.com/2015/03/einsteinium.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 10:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- The material is copied from within Wikipedia and attributed in the edit summary upon creation. This is not a copyright violation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- I think that the link [1] was probably itself a copy of Einsteinium. 141Pr 17:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)