User talk:Pranay Chopde

Welcome!

Hi Pranay Chopde! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 17:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Parmar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Parmar. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Parmar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 17:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Pawar/Bhoyar, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. iMahesh (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Pawar/Bhoyar. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. iMahesh (talk) 06:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Parmar. Info you have added to the article, was already reverted and undid by User:FutureFlowsLoveYou. Please provide a proper explanation on its talk page or summary before adding back the same info. -- iMahesh (talk) 07:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Parmar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The content you are attempting to add to the article cites another Wikipedia article as a reference. Wikipedia is not considered a reliable resource. Please only add content if you have references. I've made efforts to find suitable references, but unfortunately, I couldn't locate any. The content you are trying to include has been reverted three times, twice by me and once by another user. If you proceed with this edit, it may necessitate initiating a discussion at the Administrators' Notice Board (WP:ANI). To prevent this and establish a consensus, I recommend raising your query on the article's talk page. This will allow us to discuss the available resources and avoid the use of original research on Wikipedia. It's important to note that your talk page has already received six warnings from three different users, highlighting the significance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies.. -- iMahesh (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@IM3847@Materialscientist ANI time I think, I'm too busy. Doug Weller talk 10:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@IM3847 Competence issue also. Doug Weller talk 10:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Author has responded on Article's talkpage. We will try to settle it down on talkpage, if consensus is not reached. It'll be on ANI. iMahesh (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhoyar Pawar/Panwar (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Panwar instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhoyar Pawar/Panwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pranay Chopde! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Draft:क्षत्रिय परमार/पावर वंश

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Draft:क्षत्रिय परमार/पावर वंश to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. Pages in foreign languages will not be kept here, and may be deleted if they are not translated into English. Thank you. Eye snore 00:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: क्षत्रिय परमार/पावर वंश (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any reliable sources or references. Wikipedia is not an acceptable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:क्षत्रिय परमार/पावर वंश and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editor is trying to rewrite Paramara dynasty as a new article

@Dan arndt, Eyesnore, Taking Out The Trash, and Materialscientist: Also see their recent edit to it.[1] They don't seem to have found this talk page either so they might not know why their attempts have been declined or reverted. Doug Weller talk 16:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pawar/Bhoyar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pawar/Bhoyar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. iMahesh (talk) 06:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pawar/Bhoyar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pawar/Bhoyar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawar/Bhoyar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

iMahesh (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary that says "added content" deleted content, ie you misrepresented your edit

Special:Diff/1176370890 Edit summaries like this one can get you blocked. Doug Weller talk 09:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent editing of the article Pawar/Bhoyar

Concerning this edit, in which you partially reverted editing of mine:

I find it difficult to see how you can regard cutting a word from its place and moving it to another point in the sentence as a "typo", as you said in the edit summary. Please take note of the message above from Doug Weller; if you continue to give edit summaries which misrepresent what your edits are doing then you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator.
Whether you really thought that my edit was a "typo" or not I can assure you that it wasn't; it was a completely intentional change. Anyone unused to Indian proper names (i.e. the vast majority of readers of English Wikipedia) might think that "the emperor of Ujjain Vikramaditya" refers to the emperor of an empire called "Ujjain Vikramaditya", whereas "Vikramaditya the emperor of Ujjain" is completely unambiguous: it has to mean a person named "Vikramaditya" who was emperor of an empire called "Ujjain". If you disagree, and believe that you know of good reasons for preferring the version you have posted and then reverted to, then please explain those reasons, so we can consider which to settle for.
English usage is that punctuation marks, apart from opening brackets and quotation marks, don't have spaces before them. You originally placed a space between "Ujjain" and the following comma, which I removed, and which you then replaced. In the same edit you also added a space between "folklore" and the following comma. There are many other cases of your making mistakes relating to punctuation. I shall remove those spaces again, and I strongly recommend not changing punctuation in articles, as you evidently don't have sufficient knowledge of how punctuation works in English to be able to do so correctly. JBW (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since I posted the above message you have made 41 edits, including 10 to the article in question, but you have not indicated disagreement with the reasoning I gave, nor even made any response. I therefore assume that you have objection to it, so I have restored my change. JBW (talk) 19:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively ignoring community concerns voiced here on this page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bhoyar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bhoyar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ibjaja055 (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ibjaja055 Basically this is a copy of this article up for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawar/Bhoyar which is what this editor was trying to change Paramara dynasty if you look at their edits there. Doug Weller talk 16:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Thank you for the notification. I can see that the editor has been blocked. He even received six warnings on his talk page without taking heed. I think he is probably a distruptive editor or issue of competency. Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhoyar caste (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawar/Bhoyar.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhoyar caste and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 03:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Panwar P per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Panwar P. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:क्षत्रिय परमार/पावर वंश

Hello, Pranay Chopde. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:क्षत्रिय परमार/पावर वंश, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:क्षत्रिय परमार/पावर वंश

Hello, Pranay Chopde. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "पावर वंश".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhoyar Pawar/Panwar

Hello, Pranay Chopde. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhoyar Pawar/Panwar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]