User talk:Prakrutiprajapanti

Prakrutiprajapanti, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Prakrutiprajapanti! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Prakrutiprajapanti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mutahir Showkat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mutahir Showkat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 14:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello Prakrutiprajapanti. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Mutahir Showkat, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Prakrutiprajapanti. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Prakrutiprajapanti|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheAafi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Mutahir Showkat have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 15:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Draft:Anushka Sen. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 10:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Third COI disclosure request

You can delete Deb's COI disclosure request and Blablubbs's follow-up all you want, but you MUST disclose any conflict of interest. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GPL93, I was thinking to leave a similar message. Looks like there is once again promotional connection with Hums4r who refers to himself as Mutahir Showkat ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 15:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheAafi I have no idea about this one, i am very shocked to see this, seems like someone is trying to get me blocked by depicting personal ties to me intentionally . I will request you to just decline and delete the drafts made on my name, also i will request you to file an SPI and CU on that username to confirm this, if it was me you can get me blocked completely from wikipedia, but it is not me at all. i am sure it is people who hate me, they're doing this. i will also post the same on my User page right now.Hums4r (Let's Talk) 21:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mutahir Showkat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mutahir Showkat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 09:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hums4r per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hums4r. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]