User talk:Polarman~enwiki

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Polarman: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!--omtay38 02:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Håkon Winther

An article that you have been involved in editing, Håkon Winther, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Håkon Winther. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?--ClubOranje^Talk 14:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Nzinga

Thanks for your message. I've removed the unsourced content from the article that I was unable to find any references for and have tried to add some correct content using sources I was able to find. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down

Why are you so angry? Did Christian Nzinga steal your last bag of Cheetos or something? --JonBroxton (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not angry but upset with your attitude and policy for collecting data. You can't find a picture that was never taken can you? How can you ask me to provide you sources of events that never took place? And I'm a bit upset because the response i got from Nzinga himself was not what i expected. It was a response that involved both me and my family. Polarman (talk) 02:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

playerhistory.com

Hi. Could you tell me on what basis you are adding links to playerhistory.com to multiple football player articles? From what I can see of this website, it contains nothing that is not already in the Wikipedia article itself, or could not added to the article. Therefore, in accordance to external website links policy I have been removing them. But happy to hear what unique resource you think they are adding to the article. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding a suspected conflict of interests. The thread is User:Polarman and conflict of interest. Thank you. —– Pee Jay 18:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion has been moved to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#User:Polarman and conflict of interest. – Pee Jay 18:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Håkon Winther for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Håkon Winther is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Håkon Winther (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerdatabase/Playerhistory

Hello. I reverted some of your removals of the soccerdatabase.eu links. The site is a copy of former playerhistory.com which is a very usefull and fairly reliable generalistic football website (I supose you know it). Also, please don´t remove links from user pages as you did on my User:FkpCascais/Sandbox17, that is a personal page with no interference to WP articles. It is my choice to have them listed in the list of sources which are usefull for me. Anyway, you should contact and approach users first. Why are you removing the links by the way? Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see! Can I ask you if there are any problems with the new adress, or will it be available from now on under soccerdatabase.eu? I noteced you had problems in the past for adding the links, but I belave there is no reason whatsoever for you to remove the existing links from the articles where it is usefull. Personally, I have used it for several articles as complementary source, as in many ocasions it included data for certain players which is not found in any other sources. I see no reason for removing it from those cases, unless, of course, you know something I don´t. FkpCascais (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Polarman (talk) 00:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC) I am the owner of the domain www.playerhistory.com, soccerdatabase.eu is a scam and will be removed asap. Therefor i want you to remove ALL links replacing playerhistory, and then delete playerhistory links until the new site is up running.[reply]

OK, I see. That is why I said "unless you know something I don´t", as once I was aware that you were the owner of playerhistory.com, I suposed you might have some valid reason for wanting to have the links removed. Anyway, as a football stats enthusiast, I want to congratulate you for having created such a great football website, and I hope you soon solve all the problems related to it.

It may not be a bad idea to drop a comment regarding this situation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football as we had this discussion recently. FkpCascais (talk) 03:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Polarman (talk) 12:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC) It's a mirror site without made without my knowledge. I have put a lawyer on the case, and i prefer if you please remove all links regarding soccerdatabase.eu. We are currently working on a new solution for playerhistory. Polarman (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Is it possible to remove all soccerdatabase.eu link connected to playerhistory.com? Soccerdatabase is a scam site and has nothing todo with playerhistory.com[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Jim1138. This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jeff Bryant (footballer) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 00:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Polarman (talk) 00:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC) I am the owner of the domain www.playerhistory.com, soccerdatabase.eu is a scam and will be removed asap. Therefor i want you to remove ALL links replacing playerhistory, and then delete playerhistory links until the new site is up running.[reply]

soccerdatabase.eu

Please see Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 49#soccerdatabase.eu - but be very careful when you mention legal action, per WP:NLT. Regards, Giant Snowman 13:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in commenting at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#soccerdatabase.eu. Giant Snowman 12:33, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Polarman. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Polarman~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

17:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Playerhistory logo.jpg

The file File:Playerhistory logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]