User talk:Polar115

This is Polar115's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 'Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel' (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This looks like a copy-paste from a research paper / abstract

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:'Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel' and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:'Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel', click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Polar115! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Draft:Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Metin Celalettin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Metin Celalettin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 12:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Polar115. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 15:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metin Celalettin

The article Metin Celalettin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No recognition of what is required for WP:BLP - needs to be taken to draft space - not fit for main space in its current form

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JarrahTree 00:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Metin Celalettin

Needs to be put into draft space until you get a really good handle on what is required for WP:BLP - it should not be left in main space in its current condition. JarrahTree

If someone goes to the trouble to place categories in the article

Please do not delete them, more likely you are to have a deleted article JarrahTree 06:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC) Sorry JarrahTree - just trying to remove anything not verifiable as the page is perfectly allowed as it is under the rules[reply]

A few things to learn WP:SIGN

leave the article in main space in the current state and it will get deleted, the rules as you put it would normally have deleted it by now. JarrahTree 06:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers mate, apologies, am just learning and will add that section again tonight

Please learn to WP:SIGN - and for heavens sake find wP:RS or otherwise forget it JarrahTree 06:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And find something other than that one reference repeated or its down the gurgler in one fell swoop - see wP:N and WP:V JarrahTree 06:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the other journal article and once the third is published I will add that. I'm really not trying to be a pain in the a$$ mate I am sincerely just learning

please stop calling me mate

Thanks.

Career - waste of time, by association is not the same as WP:RS - and really there is nothing WP:N notable about the indivudal that reaches reliable sources to be able to quote. Further more if it is in actual fact you - you have major issues with not just a grenade, but WP:COI - simply nothing in the system to verify your assertions, and WP:BLP simply is not passed by a set of very similar sources. JarrahTree 08:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also claims about employment or positions require WP:RS in WP:BLP articles. JarrahTree 08:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No its not me it's for someone who is at my university whose findings will give us a new quantum physics division hopefully. I found verifiable information RE career that attests to why the individual chose to focus on Defence related quantum physics, hence the soon to be included 'Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel' which is why I would like the article up. I have WP:RS in the APS gazette (WP:BLP articles) and found the individual on the Australian computer science website for which you needed to have completed that degree among others. The heavy focus on Defence will feed into the background of the tunnel, Alex

The draft article is no-where near what would be accepted by editors who have capacity to understand the maths and physics. The threshold and V and N requirements are such, that it does not meet them.

You have been given links for guidelines that are required for a valid WP:BLP to survive as an article.

There are guidelines that are required for WP:V - and they do not include things by association.

To include AKA's that are unverified in any way is a real problem.

There a considerable issues with claiming to be something - there needs to be a good set of items in researchgate, or similar university utlised databases - 2 articles or so is nothing. You really are wasting time - yours and others if you think you can meet the guidelines so far, from what you have entered so far. You really need a lot more material that is specifically over the threshold... JarrahTree 08:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice JarrahTree - I'll just delete everything I added as I seem to be making it worse and don't appreciate being spoken to like I am a fool

Not the case - your are quite wrong - it is always very difficult to get a handle on how wikipedia works for new users... what you self identify depends on you, if i have repeated myself too many times on the specific policies that I see as being the problem for your edits so far - my apologies. JarrahTree 09:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop doing this. Do not remove the reviewer's comment, and do not add your own Meters (talk) 05:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How about

How about some information on the founder and the companies Invizigroup and The Crash Group. Where he studied, when he got his PhD, when the business started, his bio on invizigroup says he was injured was that reported anywhere the invizigroup webpage isnt independent it can prodive basic infometion but it doesnt count towards establishing notability. Gnan garra 08:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

too much unsourced content

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Polar115 (talk) 09:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel

Hello, Polar115. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:50, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]