User talk:Pmisson

Recent edits to AB magnitude

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the AB magnitude article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. If I was incorrect and this was part of the article please let me know. Thank you! Surfer43 (talk) 01:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of citizen science projects has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of citizen science projects was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/citiesatnightiss) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello! I'm Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page Light pollution appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "Light pollution is the presence of any artificial lighting." is not a correct definition of this concept. Belbury (talk) 10:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I alredy explained here my arguments. So I expect you to revert the acticle to my version: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Light_pollution#Light_pollution_definition. Pmisson (talk) 16:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you hadn't posted that at the time I reverted the edit. I've replied on the talk page. Belbury (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]