User talk:PloniAlmoni
Gettysburg Address
[edit]Hi, PloniAlmoni, I liked the Sandburg quotation, but I don't think it belongs in the middle of the introduction (it is, after all, just one man's opinion of Lincoln, even though he is a significant scholar of Lincoln). See the talk page if you have comments about this, and thanks for your contribution! Kaisershatner (talk) 13:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Pauli and the neutrino
[edit]Hello, PloniAlmoni. Thank you for your question over at Talk:The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question?. I really enjoyed answering it. And I am glad to see your interest in this article. You can read my reply, under your question. Ti-30X (talk) 23:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Ciudad Juarez
[edit]I have removed the nuclear accident text. It is too long for an article on the town, see WP:UNDUE. You were resting it on a single source, which is not good practice. It doesn't read encyclopedically, it reads like a newspaper account, and the spelling and grammar need improvement. A short and well sourced couple of lines might be appropriate for the main article. If you want to include it in more detail, a separate article would be needed, but only if you can prove it is WP:NOTABLE.
Text I removed
|
|---|
Nuclear accident[edit]In 1977 a Lubbock, Texas hospital sold a 20 year old Picker 3000 radiotherapy unit to an X-ray equipment company in Fort Worth, which in turn sold it to the Centro Medico medical clinic in Juarez. The unit contained 6,010 tiny, silvery pellets that looked like cake decorations. These were pellets of radioactive cobalt, stored in a stainless steel container. The container was sealed in a tungsten wheel the size of a tricycle tire, which was then placed behind thick lead shielding. (Radiation emitted through a pinhole in the lead is used to treat patients with localized cancers.) In Juarez, the machine was never used because the clinic was not able to hire the specialist required to operate the device. In November 1983, an electrician named Vicente Sotelo came to the clinic to pick up some material to be taken to the Jonke Fenix junkyard in Juarez. He and a co-worker took the radioactive tungsten wheel as well, which had been removed from its enormous lead casing, and put it into the back of their pickup truck. Not knowing what it was, Sotelo forced open the unmarked capsule on the back of his truck. When the capsule was breached it held about 400 curies of radioactive cobalt. Each pellet produced a radiation dose of 25 rads per hour to a person standing two inches from the pellet. 50 rads per hour is considered a significant radiation dose. An average chest X-ray produces a dose of 20 to 30 millirads. A lethal dose (for half the population) is 450 rads received instantaneously over the whole body. In comparison, the highest exposure a bystander could have received from the Three Mile Island nuclear accident was 100 millirads, i.e. one-tenth of a rad. By Dec. 6, 1983 Sotelo had thrown the capsule into the salvage yard. Despite getting rid of it, about 60 curies of cobalt remained on his truck, which stood parked for eight weeks in his yard, emitting a dose of 50 rads per hour at a distance of 1 meter. The majority of the cobalt pellets - 340 curies worth - were spread throughout the junkyard, contaminating everything. The operators used a giant magnet used to pick up and load scrap metal onto trucks for recycling at Mexican foundries. The capsule itself was made of nonferrous metal, so that every time it was scooped up by the magnet it fell back to the ground, spilling out more cobalt pellets. The pellets were ferrous, so the magnet picked them up and mixed them into the scrap leaving the junkyard. Some pellets were pulverized and thoroughly spread across the huge junkyard, and others are believed to have become embedded in truck tires and spread along highways. In this manner, 300 curies of radioactive cobalt made its way to two Mexican foundries. One, in Juarez, manufactured metal table legs, which sent them to the largest distributor of restaurant tables in the United States. Another, in Chihuahua, produced about 5,000 tons of rebar - steel rods used to reinforce concrete in building projects. About 600 tons of the contaminated steel was shipped to the United States in December,1983 and January, 1984. The contamination was eventually discover, but only to a fortunate accident. A delivery truck containing contaminated steel took a wrong turn into the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico on Jan. 17, 1984, tripping the radiation alarms that are designed to make sure radioactive material does not accidentally leave the laboratory. The radiation was quickly traced to the junkyard, which was closed on Jan. 20; Mr. Sotelo's truck was found and impounded on Jan. 26 1984. American officials tracked down all the table legs and rebar in February and March and returned the material to Mexico. While there were a few hot spots of up to 600 millirads per hour, most of the metal produced very low levels of radiation and was said to have never posed a serious health threat to people who came in contact with the metal. However, the situation in Mexican was more complicated, since it was found that 40 curies of the cobalt pellets remained spread around the junkyard; it took two months to clean up the site . Pellets were off the bouncing truck on the roads between Juarez and Chihuahua. In April 1984, a reconnaisance survey performed by the U.S. Department of Energy found 22 radioactive sites. Eight pellets were dug out of highway pavement. Thousands of tons of contaminated rebar were found to have spread into four or five Mexican states. Damage to humans[edit]Several people were exposed to 150 or 200 rads, higher than the doses received by Marshall Islanders who encountered radioactive fallout from United States nuclear tests. Those with the highest exposures included two junkyard workers, one of Mr. Sotelo's neighbors and the man who helped Mr. Sotelo load the device off the truck. Mr. Sotelo himself escaped serious contamination. |
Fences&Windows 02:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chazante
[edit]
The article Chazante has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Wikipedia is not a Dictionary, this entry would be better off in Wiktionary
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim1357 (talk) 01:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 15:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yup, you were right! : ) Tim1357 (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Black Sea deluge theory. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Gabriel Kielland (talk) 12:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Platinum
[edit]Sorry about that revert, I didn't notice that the 4th octet of the IP was different. I though I rollbacked to the version by Materialscientist. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 17:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Jan Peerce
[edit]FYI, in case you don't know: the "ibid" tag in this section requests a fix regarding this edit to the Jan Peerce article. --Rich Janis (talk) 04:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judaeo-Spanish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highland Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Renaissance composers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[[Balduin Hoyoul]] (1547/8-1594)) Active in Stuttgart and Munich
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:54, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kossuth (Bartók), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, PloniAlmoni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, PloniAlmoni. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, PloniAlmoni. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Requiem für einen jungen Dichter
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Deskford (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Zaidee Parkinson moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Zaidee Parkinson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaidee Parkinson (September 7)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zaidee Parkinson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zaidee Parkinson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Draft:Zaidee Parkinson concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zaidee Parkinson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Zaidee Parkinson
[edit]
Hello, PloniAlmoni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zaidee Parkinson".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Requests
[edit]When you add that a singer is married, please supply a reliable source. We don't need a link to French, per WP:OVERLINK. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)