User talk:Pktrisha

What do you think about AIs on Wikipedia?

Hi Pktrisha,

Welcome to the Wikipedia community! :)

Did you know that there are numerous Artificial Intelligences (AIs) that support Wikipedia? I saw your post on Teahouse, so I wanted to reach out. Are you interested in participating in a short interview to share your thoughts about how Wikipedia AIs should work? It would only take about 15-30 minutes over phone or video chat. Could be a fun way for you to learn more about how Wikipedia works!

I am working in collaboration with Wikimedia Foundation staff to do this research, so if you decide to participate, your opinion could help build the future of Wikipedia. I’m personally contacting only a small handful of new Wikipedia editors, so please let me know if you are interested or have any questions. Hope to talk to you soon!

Best, Estelle, aka FauxNeme (talk) 15:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS. You can learn more about our study here.

Hi Pktrisha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

10:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Pktrisha. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachael Kungu (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachael Kungu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rachael Kungu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rachael Kungu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rachael Kungu. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 04:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me but am a new user on Wikipedia and I think i messed up in the referencing as well as citing which nullifies my article but if you don't mind, I'd be glad if you could offer help which i can use to better my article and re-submit. ThanksPktrisha (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Kungu

Hello Pktrisha, the best way that I can teach you, is by showing you. Study the changes that I have made and then re-submit the article. Some pointers:

The important references are those about the subject of the article. References about the subject make that subject notable.
Material that is not referenced, even if factual, is inadmissible in a Wikipedia article.
We do not have to list every fact about the subject. Keep the story pertinent, but interesting.
With practice, you will get better. You improve with every new article that you write.
Let me now if I can be of further assistance.
Finally, how did you decide that I should be the one to help you?

Fsmatovu 22:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Rachael Kungu

Hello Fsmatovu, I have seen the changes you made to the article and am happy about the changes you made because it made me realise I had written very many things that were misdirecting the article from the original subject and facts. Plus I noticed you added some information that I had not time to research and find so thank you very much. About how I decided you should be the one to help me, I was looking at some of the Ugandan Wikipedia articles and you had been re-editing articles and making them better. You were atleast one of the most active people helping to make the articles earn their place on wikipedia which made me feel I should ask for help from somebody experienced. So do you think I can add changes(not that I have any) or I should resubmit it just the way it is? Plus am failing to re-submit, not sure how it's done. Lastly, am working on another article Nisha Kalema and am hoping to do something better, hope you can look through it too when I submit it. Am so grateful Pktrisha (talk) 08:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pktrisha! You created a thread called CLARIFICATION at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachael Kungu has been accepted

Rachael Kungu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zeromonk (talk) 11:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]