User talk:Pkeets/Archive 1

Please don't keep adding your forum to the Roger Daltrey page. It doesn't actually add anything to our knowledge about Daltrey and anyone who really cares can find it by other means. James James 00:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about Wiki Experience from a Newbie

Hi, In December I tried my first minor edits to Wikipedia articles and checking back now, I don't see them. I thought these were bits of information that were commonly known, but the page history indicates maybe they weren't accepted. Is this likely, and why? Should I provide references to verify what I add? Also, I've got a snotty message from some guy about adding a fan forum link, when I see these on plenty of other celebrity articles. What should I think about this? Thanks for the help. Pkeets 01:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pkeets,

It's recommended that you always cite your sources, even if it seems to be common knowledge. (Some users may think it unverifiable and remove it.)

On the fan forum link: if you see the fan forum links on numerous other articles, mention that in a message on the talk page. If the subject of that article indeed has a large fan forum, and it's relevant to the article, it would probably be useful; however, if you are getting warnings about it, it may be best to first discuss. --Wikiacc 20:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice that some articles linked to the ones I worked on are now missing, which leaves a link hanging. If you're going to delete articles, shouldn't someone clean up these broken links? Pkeets 02:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the article. If the subject of the article deleted is non-notable or otherwise not deserving of an article, the links to it are usually removed. If the subject is notable, we usually keep the links so people can find them later and create a good article. (Redirects to the deleted page are always deleted.) --Wikiacc 20:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandii & the Sunsetz

This article was deleted because it did not contain evidence of the topic's notability. I think this was too quick for that: you should have been given time to fix it up after just creating it. However, in this case the text is copied directly from the websites listed at the bottom, which is not allowed. If you are making articles from the Requested articles page you should do a little check to make sure the text is not copied from somewhere else. —Centrx→talk • 04:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, N. Can you retrieve the info for me? This was an "article requested for two years" and I had done considerable work in assembling the info, which I was in process of assembling into an article. It was ill considered to save it in that condition, but the fact remains now that the work I had done on it is lost if you can't retrieve it. Pkeets 04:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a closer look. Here is the beginning and end parts, that you created. Everything in between was from the linked websites. Note in the future though, you can't begin the page with the copied content and then work from there. It's possible no one will notice, but if the copyright holder does contact the Wikimedia Foundation, the entire page might end up having to be deleted (and it also does pose this practical problem of an admin hastily deleting it after seeing a copy-paste page, which are typically not improved).

Good job. Thanks. I added just a wee bits. Bearian 21:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VK bands

The only thing I can think of that would establish notability in any of these cases would be a discography, maybe. All those bands never released anything major in Japan that I can think of offhand, and I'm not even sure if any of them ever released an album. You're looking at bands that lasted two to three years, and that was it. As such, they don't meet notability guidelines as they stand now.

what you need is back issues of Fool's Mate and SHOXX, and I don't have any from the time period you need. If you can find scans, I can certainly read them and add them if they're useful. What you might want to do in the meantime is let the articles go, and start with a label article on Key Party, because they had anybody who was anybody at the time. however, I would suggest you move your current articles to userspace and continue to work on them. However, TBH, I don't think any of those bands were notable for themselves; rather, they were notable only because a small niche group of people picked up on the genre and pushed it regardless of quality of music. However, a label as a driving force is notable, esp. with the Key Party concerts and omnibus albums. Matina and Soleil did similar things as well. In short, come at your topic from a different angle, and remember to sign your posts with four tildes. MSJapan 00:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit the page you want to move, select all the text, and then copy/paste it to a subpage (you would make a subpage by doing User:Pkeets/whatever, and you can do that repeatedly), and that's it. Japanese Net sources on VK bands are minimal, and usually don't meet RS. For MR, I found grass thread, the VK DB, an even worse article on the Japanese WP, and that's about it. You really need the mags, because they were mainstream enough and covered the bands multiple times. MSJapan 01:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yoshukai International

An editor has nominated Yoshukai International, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoshukai International and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deleted Key Party Records Reference

Let me quote the FAQ on jrocksaga.com:

› Who are you and why do you keep this website?
I'm a 20-something portuguese lass. My online nickname is klept, although I have a couple of other aliases (it's pretty random but I'm pretty much the same person! ;). I keep this site because I love japanese rock and I want to share it with as many people as possible and also because this site makes a good web project where I can experiment different ideas.

So basically, it's just a random person running a self-published web page with a lot of content on Japanese rock music. Or in other words, a fan site. This does not qualify as a reliable source per WP:RS and hence should not be used to reference information on Wikipedia. I know there are not all that many reliable English sources on modern Japanese music but you can always turn to places like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan and editors from that project if you need help with Japanese sources.

One more thing: If one of your additions is being removed, with a rationale and/or an applicable guideline given in the other editors edit summary, try to discuss this matter immediately, or add a rationale in your own summary, should you revert the removal (like you did here, but without a summary). More communication between editors = less stress for everyone involved. Have a nice day - Cyrus XIII 15:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshukai International

Sorry about re adding fact tag, missed the retired gynaecologist bit when I skimmed the ref 1st time, just seen to many MA instructors claiming the title dr/prof, without evidence of or, usually, any legitimate reason at all. --Nate 08:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thanks

No problem, anytime. Let me know if you have issues with templates again, I've become fairly good with them. :-) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Ore

Thanks for figuring out that Darren Campbell stuff. Sorry I got the wrong one. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your missilina rei article

Hi, been away for some time now, so I just thought I should let you know I've responded to your comments on my user page. Bfg 15:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Visual kei

Unfortunately, I don't think I can really help. I've only worked on visual kei related stuff as part of a project to work on all the "music ofs" and such articles - I don't really have any particular knowledge of visual kei, or sources that would really help expand info in that area. Sorry... Tuf-Kat 03:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well... he's probably right. In most cases, fan sites are not reliable sources - we didn't use to be very strict about that kind of thing, but they really should be verified with more appropriate resources. Tuf-Kat 18:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock gods

Help:Redirect may help you. Will ^(talk) 21:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - use that to edit the page so it isn't a redirect. Will ^(talk) 14:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:TheWhoLiveFromTorontoCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheWhoLiveFromTorontoCover.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheWhoLiveFromTorontoCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheWhoLiveFromTorontoCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Ball

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Lawrence Ball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Oli Filth 23:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aliene Ma'riage

I know you have worked on this before - he deleted the main page and "integrated" the info into the opening paragraph. I actually started this hoping someone would come flesh it out. Will you take a look? [[2]]Denaar 13:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get around digging up some information on Missalina Rei and see what I can find. They aren't a recent band so that means digging through magazines. I do know a little about the Bass player's later bands. :) Denaar 05:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gods of rock and roll

Gods of rock and roll, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Gods of rock and roll satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gods of rock and roll and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Gods of rock and roll during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 14:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need Info on Using Permissions for Photos

I have photos from Lawrence Ball and email permission to use them. I uploaded one and thought I had described the permission adequately, but it was deleted. I've tried asking in several places how to register the permissions with no response.

quite simply, it can't be fair use and Creative Commons at the same time, this what was said at the time by the person who deleted it on the deletion log, if you want to clear this up, contact him.

Replaceable fair use Image:HeatherMills.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:HeatherMills.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 10:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:BassPlayerCover.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:BassPlayerCover.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 10:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ringo Choose Love CD cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ringo Choose Love CD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheWhoBlackWidowEyes-UK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheWhoBlackWidowEyes-UK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheWhoTea&Theater-USA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheWhoTea&Theater-USA.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TheWhoTea&TheaterUSA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheWhoTea&TheaterUSA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. β^_command 22:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DaltreyGivingItAllAWay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DaltreyGivingItAllAWay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DaltreyMcVicar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DaltreyMcVicar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DaltreyMoonlighting.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DaltreyMoonlighting.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DaltreyBestBits.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DaltreyBestBits.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ConcertforNYC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ConcertforNYC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Squadronaires2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Squadronaires2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WizardofOzinConcert.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WizardofOzinConcert.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FullerShineCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FullerShineCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FullerCigHouseCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FullerCigHouseCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:BuddysSong.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BuddysSong.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:DaltreyMartyrsandMadmen.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TheWhoBlackWidowEyes-UK.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheWhoBlackWidowEyes-UK.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TheWhoTea&Theater-USA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheWhoTea&Theater-USA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Missalina Rei

I have nominated Missalina Rei, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missalina Rei. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Wizardman 14:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Missalina Rei

I understand what you're saying, though the Japanese Wikipedia version of the band was also deleted back in december (granted, it was speedied, but still). If you're still concerned then you have an arguable case at WP:DRV, I'll support you taking it there. Wizardman 03:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SandiiViva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SandiiViva.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pkeets! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 15 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jody Linscott - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Award

I think you deserve this...

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		I award Pkeets this barnstar for working with others to improve the Pete Townshend article and reach a consensus on its content. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Pkeets. You have new messages at Darkwind's talk page.
Message added 19:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Darkwind (talk) 19:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pkeets. You have new messages at fuhghettaboutit's talk page. -- ~~~~~

I removed something

I have just removed something...thinking its to be on the talk page...but now that i see it was you I am not sure...is it normal to see the nominated for deletion on main page?? I think it set a POV tone right of the bat if this page/person is relevant..but like i said did not see it was you ...O yes i mean here --->Masami Tsuruoka ...anyways if this is the norm pls revert my edit.Moxy (talk) 02:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So i am done ..sorry i took over that article...i am the guy that takes care of the Order of Ontario/Canada etc people. Moxy (talk) 05:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martial Arts Barnstar

		The Martial Arts Barnstar
		{{{1}}}

Redirecting

Hey Pkeets. I'd just like to inform you, that to redirect a page, you do this "#REDIRECT Pagelink". I hope to see you making more great articles! Thanks for the contributions! If you have any questions, just reply here. :D Endofskull (talk) 02:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Wilson Swisher

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gloria Wilson Swisher, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.arsnovamusic.com/swisher.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The material was attributed, but I removed it anyway.Pkeets (talk) 02:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hiroyuki Yamamoto (composer)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hiroyuki Yamamoto (composer), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://japanesecomposers.info/eng/modules/tinyd0/index.php?id=8.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used translations from the Dutch and Japanese articles. If these were copied from the website in question, then it will certainly be similar. I'll have a look.Pkeets (talk) 04:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Julia Usher

A tag has been placed on Julia Usher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article, for the award indicates importance. But it's only a 4th place award from a specialized society. Recording are asserted, but details will be required to show notability I advise you to do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 22:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but note there are two awards listed.Pkeets (talk) 23:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. I've lest you some further advice and sources at WikiProject Composers. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liana Alexandra

A tag has been placed on Liana Alexandra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Avril Anderson

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Avril Anderson, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nmcrec.co.uk/composer/anderson-avril.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Izabella Arazova

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Izabella Arazova, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://composers-classical-music.com/a/ArazovaIzabella-Arazian.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Berthe di Vito-Delvaux

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Berthe di Vito-Delvaux, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cebedem.be/en/composers/v/148-vito-delvaux-berthe-di.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Marta Vlad

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Marina Marta Vlad, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://composers21.com/compdocs/vladmm.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes Tyrrell

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Agnes Tyrrell, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://composers-classical-music.com/t/TyrrellAgnes.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Josephine Troup

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Josephine Troup, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lieder.net/lieder/t/troup.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Karmella Tsepkolenko

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Karmella Tsepkolenko, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://composers21.com/compdocs/tsepkolk.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Betty Olivero

The article Betty Olivero has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. E Wing (talk) 04:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:HarmonicMaths25.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HarmonicMaths25.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maija Einfelde

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maija Einfelde, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.radiokoris.lv/index.php?&233.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marga Richter

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Marga Richter, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.composers21.com/compdocs/richterm.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 16:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Esther Rofe

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Esther Rofe, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.australiadancing.org/subjects/4181.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Röntgen-Maier

At Talk:Amanda Röntgen-Maier, I asked for clarification of a couple of points. One of this was whether the non-existing "Stockholm State Library", where her papers were supposedly kept, may have refered to the Stockholm Public Library or to the Swedish Royal Library (National Library) in Stockholm. You later changed this to clarify that it was the latter. The problem is that you added no source for this. In fact, the entire article is still dependent on a single blog entry as its only source. Neither NAD, the National Archive database, nor the search engine Ediffah, both of which include collections of manuscripts and personal papers in several leading Swedish libraries and archives, comes up with anything that looks like her personal papers.

I believe that there is still a large amount of older material not yet indexed in these databases, and if you have used one of the card indices at the Royal Library, it is perfectly fine to state so in a footnote. It only needs to be done in such a way that it is easy for another visitor to the library to locate the same index to verify the claim. Sources in Wikipedia do not need to be on-line. In many cases, off-line sources are better, being more permanent. --Hegvald (talk) 11:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Netty Simons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Netty Simons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 03:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Pkeets. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
Message added 12:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Article creations

Thanks for your brilliant article creation work; in light of the high quality, I've asked an admin to give you autopatrolled rights, a sign of a trusted content creator. Many thanks, and congrats! Ironholds (talk) 16:29, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It means that your articles won't be required to be checked. People can still see them on the new pages list, and take a look should they wish. Ironholds (talk) 17:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lina Pires de Campos

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lina Pires de Campos, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www3.uakron.edu/bmca/composers/Campos.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Felicia Donceanu

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Felicia Donceanu, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.stabatmater.info/donceanu.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biancamaria Furgeri

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Biancamaria Furgeri, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://composers21.com/compdocs/furgerib.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minako Hamano for deletion

The article Minako Hamano is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minako Hamano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Prime Blue (talk) 14:32, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Pkeets. You have new messages at Courcelles's talk page.
Message added 16:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Makiko Kinoshita

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Makiko Kinoshita, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.m-kinoshita.com/english.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 02:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Klein

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Judy Klein, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imeb.net/IMEB_v2/?option=com_content&task=view&id=849&Itemid=236.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 04:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 31

Could I have an administrator's assistance for this review? It appears that the consensus is to reverse the deletion of the article, so I need to get that done. A suggestion has been made to place the reinstated article into my user space for revision. Pkeets (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC) {{adminhelp}}

Done. The restored article, with its history, is now at User:Pkeets/Kinuyo Yamashita. I moved the version you had there to User:Pkeets/Kinuyo Yamashita-2; if you have no further use for that one, please tag it {{db-u1}} and it will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Pkeets (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have done two things to the restored version which you will need to undo after you move it back to the mainspace: added a {{userspace draft}} template at the top, and "commented out" the categories at the bottom with . Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Minako Hamano

Unfortunately, I haven't come up with anything useful toward sourcing this article - but it's on my to-do list. Sorry, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Krystyna Moszumanska-Nazar

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Krystyna Moszumanska-Nazar, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.usc.edu/dept/polish_music/composer/moszumanska.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Red links

Red links should not be made to deleted articles and to people that do not fulfill the notability criteria. Unless you have multiple reliable independent sources with non-trivial coverage to create articles on these composers, refrain from adding those links. Prime Blue (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kinuyo Yamashita

Hi, been absent for a few days. Did you get everything you needed? Or do you still need anything from deleted revisions of the article? Step hen 01:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Well done. --Step hen 22:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Books LLC, Alphascript, Betascript, Fastbook Publishing ...

Hi Pkeets, I've removed the following Books LLC reference:

Japanese Musician Introduction. Books LLC. 2010. ISBN 1157702058.

See: User:Fences and windows/Unreliable sources and Amazon.com controversies#Sale of Wikipedia.27s material as books. Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bernadetta Matuszczak

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bernadetta Matuszczak, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.culture.pl/en/culture/artykuly/os_matuszczak_bernadetta.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. What is your source for this edit? Per WP:BLP, this requires a source, and the only other place I see this DOD is on the Portuguese Wikipedia, which is not a reliable source to report someone's death. Canadian Paul 18:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carol E Barnett

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Carol E Barnett, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.faqs.org/copyright/the-relationship-of-social-support-optimism-and-sense-of.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For continually adding referenced material and articles to Wikipedia. Denaar (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Marie Félicie Clémence de Reiset

An article that you have been involved in editing, Marie Félicie Clémence de Reiset , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Aegoceras (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Pkeets! I am Dthomsen8 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

DThomsen8 (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maura Bosch

I came across your article on Maura Bosch in the course of looking at wp:Pennsylvania articles without class or importance. I added several templates to the talk page, including a Biography I took from Edward T. Cone. Your article on Bosch is well done, and I see that you have done many more articles on composers.

I am writing to you now to suggest that you add the appropriate templates to the talk pages as you create new articles. Perhaps the class will be stub, to be changed as the article is expanded by other editors. I have the unassessed articles for Pennsylvania below 700, but the number sometimes goes up rather than down as new templates are added without assessments.

Keep up the good work. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celeste de Longpré Heckscher

I added a PERSONDATA template to Celeste de Longpré Heckscher, but I am uncertain about her name, especially the "de Longpré" part of it. Please take a look, and change it if needed. The sort order could be involved, but I would expect "Heckscher" to be the definitive surname. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've listed it correctly. I did change the Short Description to "Heckscher", too, as her scores seem to be published under that name rather than Massey. Thanks for your interest in the article!Pkeets (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of No Plan B (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on No Plan B (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nik thestoned 10:47, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pkeets. You have new messages at Nikthestoned's talk page. --13:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Hepburn (disambiguation)

Hello, just to let you know that this doesn't seem to meet WP:TWODABS guindelines and has been nominated for deletion using Template:db-disambig. I've added a hatnote, so the karetka will still be easy to find. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]