User talk:PjeterPeter

Peter

Your new GDP figures on Kosovo

Hello. I noticed that you added new 2014 estimated GDP figures, but based your GDP per capita figures on a 2011 estimate of the population of Kosovo, thus inflating GDP per capita. But don't worry, I have corrected your mistake by adding a 2014 estimate of the population and correcting the estimated GDP per capita. Next time please update both the estimated GDP and the estimated population figure, otherwise someone might get the impression that you are trying to deliberately inflate GDP per capita. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 18:09, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!

WikiProject Eurovision invitation for PjeterPeter! Hi there, I noticed your contributions to an article within our project's scope, and would like to formally invite you to join our team of editors at WikiProject Eurovision, a WikiProject dedicated to the Eurovision family of events. If you would like to join, then please add your name to this list and add the project talk page to your watchlist.. You may also wish to receive our Project's newsletter, if so then please add your name to the mailing list.

The project covers these contests.

Thanks and have a nice day! Wes Mouse 19:15, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Eurovision Song Contest 2015, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 18:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision - Urgent Message

Hi PjeterPeter, I know that you haven't yet joined WikiProject Eurovision, but are actively contributing towards ESC/JESC articles, so I felt it only right to make you aware of a serious discussion taking place at the WikiProject Eurovision talk page. Based on the edit you recently made at Eurovision Song Contest 2015, I strongly recommend that you participate or at least read the comments, as this debate is going bear a huge impact on the project as a whole and how it should be operated, and what we as Wikipedians are excepted to be doing as a team project. Please click here to read the discussion, and participate peacefully. Thank you. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 18:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Kosovo at the Olympics, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Though I noticed you have tried to stop the warring, I have put this notice on both of your pages, so as to make sure you both understand this behavior is not acceptable. (Feel free to remove this message at any time) -- Orduin ^⋠T⋡ 23:16, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, again... This user doesn't seem to even care to understand what related participations are and continues with the eye-for-eye mentality "Oh, if you remove Albania, remove Serbia as well"... User:CambridgeBayWeather I already asked help from WP:Olympics but they seem rather uninterested in wanting to enter into this. Please help us, I am loosing a bit of my patience with this. FkpCascais (talk) 15:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Albania should be included in the infobox for the following reasons:

Following Kosovo's independence and the IOC's resistance to recognise Kosovo, athletes born there, decided to participate under the flags of Serbia and Albania. Therefore, if the Serbian flag stays in the infbox, the Albanian one should as well, as those were the official other-related appearances of Kosovo's athletes (and let's not forget that the basic rule of the Olympics is that the competition is about the athletes, not their countries of origin).
If the Albanian flag is removed from the infobox, because *apparently* you can't add athlete's personal choices' countries, then you should remove Serbia as well, because de facto Kosovo was not part of Serbia since February 2008 (before the 2008 Summer Olympics)
This case is similar to the Independent Olympic Team appearance. Basically if athletes from one country can't participate for their country (like Kosovar athletes for Kosovo), they participate under ANOTHER flag, in this case the IOP; and if the IOP flag is added to the infobox, the Albanian one should as well.

This is enough explanation needed for someone who understands. --PjeterPeter (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo at the Olympics

Hi. I'm sure you mean well with your edits, but please bear in mind WP:3RR. If you have a content dispute, please raise it on the article's talkpage or with the Olympic Project. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

an agreement was reached on language. Don't rewrite it. Then the footnote needs to be added. Qwerty786 (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Please see my proposal to upmerge

Category:Kosovo at the Summer Olympics to Category:Kosovo at the Olympics

Some baklava for you!

For introducing me to the |nativename wiki markup - Royal Mate1 07:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advice at WP:DRN

This advice is often given at the dispute resolution noticeboard and applies to your case. Comment on content, not contributors. I know that you are frustrated by another editor, but the purpose of WP:DRN is to improve the article, or, in this case, template, not to discuss the other editor. Please do not complain about the other editor. Whether to include Albania is relevant, but dispute resolution does not focus on the other editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Robert McClenon. I will most certainly keep that in mind, and I'll try keeping justice in, and nationalism out. --PjeterPeter (talk) 13:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

North Mitrovica

Help out if you can, I am being harassed by Anonimski who is biting hard to keep Cyrillic on the article because he probably has never lived in Kosovo and doesn;t know that although Serbian has officialdom with Albanian it is only in Latin, never Cyrillic. Do you think you can mark your card on the article on this debate? --Let's keep it neutral (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear PjeterPeter, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of 2015 Kosovo protests. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 19:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Kosovo protests, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peja and Demonstrations. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Albanians may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southern Albania

The article Southern Albania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:GNG No evidence of stand alone encyclopedic notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pun te Shkelqyeshem miku im. Te uroj pun te mbare.

Te uroj pun te mbare. Do, Sdo... Ketu per gjithmon ! (talk) 16:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Melodifestivalen 2015, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. An experienced editor would take the time to do a quick Google search to see if there is a source to verify and then add the citation, before accusing a user of vandalism. In this case I did such search, and found a source verifying the International Juries and added it to the article. It may be appropriate to issue an apology to the user to whom you falsely accused of vandalism. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 13:34, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!

WikiProject Eurovision invitation for PjeterPeter! Hello, I've noticed that you contributed to an article within our project's scope, and would like to formally invite you to join our team of editors at WikiProject Eurovision, a WikiProject dedicated to the Eurovision family of events. If you would like to join, then please add your name to this list and add the project talk page to your watchlist. You may also wish to receive our Project's newsletter; if so then please add your name to the mailing list.

Click the show button to see which contests this project covers.

Thanks and have a nice day! Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 18:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

PjeterPeter Can I have your opinion on this case.here.Lindi29 (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PjeterPeter Can I have your opinion on this case.here.Lindi29 (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kam nevoje per ndihme

I nderuar, a mund te me ndihmosh ne lidhje me ndryshimin e emrit te faqes Community of Serb municipalities, Kosovo ne "Associactin of municpalities with Serbian majority in Kosovo" dhe a mund te me tregosh se si nderrohet emri i faqeve ne wikipedia ne kete rast i kesaj faqeje. Faleminderit. Hashanialbert (talk) 21:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Albanian parliamentary election, 2013 page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Socialist Party of Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Partia Socialiste

The "logo" you added is not used in any capacity in official party events or presentations. If you look at the official Facebook page of the Socialist Party of Albania you will only see the green circle with pink rose logo, layed out in a purple background. That is the logo used as late as the 2015 elections. It was the same logo used in this year's party congress back in March. Please do not remove it again or I'll report you for disruptive behavior.

Election results

Thanks for adding the detailed Albanian election results. However, please be aware that many of the party logos and crests of counties are non-free images – this means they can only be used on the articles about the party or county, and cannot be used on any other article (otherwise it becomes a copyright violation). Cheers, Number 5 7 12:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PjeterPeter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Results table

Please don't update the results for some parties but not others – either do it all, or not at all. Only updating some means the results table is incorrect. Thanks, Number 5 7 13:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flamuri i Preshevës

Përshëndetje, a jeni i sigurt apo a keni provë se flamuri i Preshevës është ky--Tytuu (talk) 11:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)?[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PjeterPeter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PjeterPeter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rezarta Smaja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rezarta Smaja, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rezarta Smaja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adelina Thaçi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adelina Thaçi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelina Thaçi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donika Nuhiu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donika Nuhiu, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donika Nuhiu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teuta Kurti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teuta Kurti, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teuta Kurti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Marku for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Marku, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Marku until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]