User talk:Piotrus/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Piotrus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Dear Piotrus, thank you for reviewing my site on (Władysław Grydziuszko), I believe that I need to cite the sources, I have a record of his was stories/citations via documents given to me by R.A.F, how am I able to submit this information if it is many pages and letters??
Thank you in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silent99 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, I've uploaded all of the files...thank you for your support! Merry Christmas and a happy new year! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silent99 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
On 30 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Szkłów (1654), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Wizardman 19:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I would deeply appreciate it if you could help me arrange this article properly; not being a BattleTech fan myself, at least not yet, I I want to make sure its all set. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Feel free to change the article title as well if needed, perhaps a broader "Universe of the BattleTech franchise" would be a better title to freely put these articles together in. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:BattleTech history
I have nominated Category:BattleTech history (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Polish Universities
Is there a uniform format for people associated with Polish Universities? Eg, in Category:Jagiellonian University, there is Category:Alumni of Jagiellonian University (though I think this would be better called Category:Jagiellonian University alumni), but no Category:Jagiellonian University faculty. On the other hand, Category:University of Warsaw has what I would expect in terms of faculty/alumni (for the longest of times, even that was not good, but it finally got fixed a couple of months ago). As for Warsaw University of Technology, it's a mess: no cat for the University per se, no cat for faculty (no one notable there since 1826?), only the poorly named Category:Alumni of Warsaw University of Technology, with a single alumnus (!). At any rate, I could go on, but let me stop. This is a bit frustrating, since I run all the time into articles where I would like to fit in such cats -- for some countries, this is very well done, for other much less so. I'm willing to help if there is interest in this, but I figure I'd better ask you first, see what you think. Have a happy 2008! Turgidson (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:BattleTech planets
I have nominated Category:BattleTech planets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
--Riurik(discuss) 21:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't know who else to ask, but could you please look into the discussion there? Things are getting out of hand a bit, do we really have to put up with that kind of stuff, over and over? Thanks. Turgidson (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice--this helps. I'm still hoping this will just blow away, but I'm getting to the point where I doubt it will, unless something is done. As you probably know, I'm almost exclusively interested in editing, and have been trying best I could to stay out of time- and energy-consuming fights since joining WP. But this kind of attitude (and such impugning of motives) cannot stay unchallenged, I feel, or else it will have a very depressing and chilling effect on many editors. Turgidson (talk) 00:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Sociocultural evolution FAR
Sociocultural evolution has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.
DYK
|
|
On 5 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Golden Liberty, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Wszystkiego najlepszego!
Happy New Year
|
Dear Piotrus, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ...and DYKs....and more media interviews :) ~ Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
On another note, I have informed the Signpost that you have broken Ghirla's DYK record.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations!
I've just read the Signpost tipline. Fantastic! DurovaCharge! 08:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks and Happy New Year
Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for all your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.
|
Military history service award | |
| For tagging and assessing 250 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES talk 11:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.
Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be good to have your feedback/comments on the drive at the Tag & Assess workshop
Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES talk 11:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
|
|
On January 2, 2002, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jan IV Oświęcimski, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Happy new year, and congratulations! · AndonicO Talk 12:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Warsaw Armoured Motorized Brigade
Hi. I have finally expanded the Warsaw Armoured Motorized Brigade, but I think it is too late for DYK. Or perhaps not? Perhaps you could help out with nomination? Greetings and all the best in new year 2008. Tymek (talk) 17:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
This article, to which you contributed, will be featured on the Main Page on January 5, 2008.[1] Risker (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gg first.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gg first.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Volapük again
Hi Piotrus. Perhaps you've already noticed a new proposal against the Volapük Wikipedia: m:Proposals for closing projects/Radical cleanup of Volapük Wikipedia. In case you agree that this proposal is not a good idea, perhaps you could help us fight against it with your vote? Thanks! --Smeira (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Not quite what I meant - I meant that reporting on it was probably going to be in Polish, since I'm not aware of many English-language newspapers, etc, that report on books in foreign languages at all, and Polish is somewhat of a minority language. In other words - it's of interest to readers, but Wikipedia is breaking ground here to cover it pre-rtranslation (which I hope it gets), so the fellow criticising it for the references in Polish was wrong, as we should judge the quality of sourcing in the context of the Polish sci-fi scene, not apply the standards of the English sci-fi scene. Adam Cuerden talk 01:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
new year
Hey Piotrus, sorry for being late. I hope you have a great year. Ostap 05:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Hello,
I am sorry that my wish is belated, but that makes it no less heartfelt.
Thank you for all your help, and Happy New Year! Horlo (talk) 07:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Duchies of śląskie
Thank you, P.P. for giving us such good laughs. Feel free to start some more article with a the name of a post-1945 Polish city, lacking of any content other than some medieval Piast family quarrels. -- Matthead DisOuß 11:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 3 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Kostiuchnówka, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Royalbroil 15:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Awards Role Call
// F9T 19:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
|
The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 1st Class | |
| I, Tymek (talk) 19:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC), am awarding you this Barnstar, as you are by far number one among Polish Wikipedians. Thank you for your excellent work |
Your recent post at WP:AE
Piotrus, it looks like Dr. Dan took some offense to the wording of the title on your recent AE post. Would you mind refactoring it? Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
 Issue XXII (December 2007) | ||
|
New featured articles:
New A-Class articles: | |
| ||
| ||
Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants alike are very welcome and appreciated. | ||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | ||
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Wesołych Świąt
I hope your holidays were more pleasant than those of the Sybiracy. Wesołych Świąt! Appleseed (Talk) 01:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Duchy of Silesia
Hello Piotr! I merged Silesian Province into Duchy of Silesia and expanded it a little bit. I took the medieval subdivision from de:Herzogtum Schlesien. Could you check on the 1163 info about Władysław II the Exile? Silesian Province had said he recovered the duchy in 1063, but I changed this to 1163. However, his article says he died in 1159. Olessi (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Reminder to maintain civility
A small number of your comments of late seem to have gone over the line from constructive to snide. Specifically, the comment made here, which is uncivil and an assumption of bad faith. Please refrain from making such comments about editors in the future despite your displeasure with their behavior. You bring a lot to this project and I would hate to see you stoop to that level. Thanks! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for coming to my page, Piotrus. I was offended by some of your comments and although we do have vastly differing opinions on some of the common articles we find ourselves editing, we should never let get in the way of policy, peace, civility and happy editing for all. I am grateful that you apologized and I accept it. I, too, apologize for grief and issues which I have caused and which I have been party to. I hope to work in a way to provide the best possible reading and learning experience for users of Wikipedia. Charles 17:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of Peace | |
| For gracefully patching things up with Charles after the edit dispute that turned into a hot 3RR topic. If only all editors dealing with Eastern European topics could be as polite and gracious as you two, Wikipedia would be a much better place. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
Pless
(I'm sorry, I forget the Polish name.)
But I must retract the statement that yours is the weakest evidence for English usage; Talk:Iaşi-Chişinău Offensive contains a defense of the present name on the grounds that it is used by BBC's Rumanian Service, in Rumanian. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
Hi ! May I please for ban for the user named "Faustian" :
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Faustian
His vandalistic influence on many articles such as Roman Dmowski are destructible to English Wikipedia's level. Non-stopped war in the article above, here :
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Roman_Dmowski&action=history
Please, ban him.
--Krzyzowiec (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "O"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "P"s through "S"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++Lar: t/c 04:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for this. Regrettably, Wikipedia:Etiquette guideline is never read frequently enough around here. --Poeticbent talk 03:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 8 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article testament of Bolesław III Krzywousty, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Carabinieri (talk) 05:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Regarding Polish nationalism
First of all, thanks for your comment, having been on Wikipedia for a long time, I know you as a responsible and sensitive contributor. Despite that, I was a bit surprised by your warning. I am sure you are aware that some users on Wikipedia, regardless of their nationality, edit Wikipedia with a nationalist agenda. If memory doesn't fail me, we have both been involved in a couple of disputes with some Russian users engaged in such actions. It is my belief that users who only try to paint their own nation in the most positive pictures are not contributing as well as they could on Wikipedia. Of course every contributor is always welcome, but you know just as well as I do that many edit wars are fought precisely over this issue - nationalists from two sides who clash with each other. Regarding Poeticbent, I stand behind my words. He gladly deletes content if it's not favouring Poland and I don't particularly likes his habit of taking legitimate warnings and moving them to the user pages of those who had issue them. May I respectfully ask how you would consider a Russian user who deleted content not favouring Russia and, if warned by you, pasted your warning on your own talk page? Regards JdeJ (talk) 08:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 8 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lód, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Daniel Case (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
adding a book citation
Piotrus,
Today I tried to add a citation to the page about Jozef Haller. I do not know if I was successful. I got your message of acknowledgement. Thank you.
Please let me know if I did it correctly.
The maps that I uploaded to the Internet on my website from the Battle of Warsaw are all over Wikipedia. Unfortunately, I cannot take credit for them. The are from the book Cud ha Wisla by Arciszewski. I'd like to learn how to do this correctly so I can add all the appropriate citations to the articles on Wiki. I'd hate to be accused of academic dishonesty when I am so close to my PhD.
Regards, Bob Tarwacki Fop145 (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 9 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Warsaw Armoured Motorized Brigade, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--The Placebo Effect (talk) 13:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Bombing of Dresden in World War II
Hi Piotrus, as one of the editors of Bombing of Dresden in World War II, would you mind commenting here about a possible name change? There is a proposal to call the article simply Bombing of Dresden. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk)(contribs) 14:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
What an outstanding article! Supported as last time, thanks for the heads up. Rudget. 16:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Orson Bean
I'm not sure who is correct? Is his real last name Burroughs OR Burrows. It seams to be posted both ways all over. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.89.244.239 (talk) 02:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dear anon, I honestly don't have any idea what you are asking. Perhaps you should try the WP:RD? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- The answer is, of course, Dallas Frederick Burroughs. I would know this as a New Yorker growing up in the golden age of TV. Bizarre place to ask, though! :-) PētersV (talk) 18:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello
I don't know if you saw my comments here, but I would to like to chat/write as well. We grad students have to stick together on wikipedia! Drop me a line when you have some free time. The semester has just started for me, but next week I will have fallen into the teaching rhythm again. Awadewit | talk 10:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your essay looks very interesting - I will spend some time reading it over the weekend. I was thinking about having my students do a wiki-essay this semester - having them write a collaborative essay at the end of the semester in groups of four or so. We'll see what happens.
- I like the idea of a grad student organization - there must be lots of us here. Do you know of one? I don't. Maria might be interested in joining as well. I think that if we unite our forces, it might be easier to convince "the establishment" that this enterprise and wikis more generally are a good idea. I am particularly interested in doing this because I think that it could promote collaborate work in the humanities more generally. :) I don't know about sociology, but in English, we tend to work alone. In monkish cells, you might say.
- In my field, there is a lot of resistance to Wikipedia and to technology in general, I'm afraid. I just went to the Modern Language Association conference at the end of December (it is the annual English professor conference) at which hopefully one sees emerging trends. I saw some exciting work with technology, but it was being done by graduate students. I saw more fear of electronic publishing and lists of problems with technology than ways to overcome those problems (rather typical of my discipline, I'm afraid) from actual professors. I have been very reticent to tell any professors about my work on Wikipedia because of these attitudes. I am already a bit of a rabble rouser (I am involved in trying to organize a graduate student union), so I figured one controversial issue was enough. However, perhaps I have nothing left to lose? :) Awadewit | talk 13:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Quick note: I handed out an extra credit assignment to my students yesterday: Based on a reading of The New York Times and others sources, how neutral is Wikipedia's Pakistan article? I urged them to look at the WP:NPOV policy and the FA criteria. I told a couple of other instructors about it and they thought it would make a great assignment. I'm planning on doing something similar for my "Evidence and sources" unit. Thanks for the idea! Awadewit | talk 00:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the pizza! I just had some less virtual pizza today - what a coincidence. :) I'll let you know when I'm in Pittsburgh. I might be in Alexandria for Wikimania 2008 - are you going to be there? Awadewit | talk 05:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Body Language needs tidying by an expert
Could you oblige? Or perhaps find someone who knows enough on the topic.
thanks
Dez82
Dez82 (talk) 07:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Map of battle of Kostiuchnowka 1916.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Map of battle of Kostiuchnowka 1916.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 23:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: State country
I am inclined to say "< something > Lordship", but I do not know of an accurate way of translated the word or idea of Standes-. I don't think "state country" is a construction which has ever been used in English. The idea in English is that a country is a type of state as it is and since the idea of state and country overlap, combining them as a term in English doesn't make so much sense. "Free state" might be an idea, but I would look for a term which is closer to one used for immediate states, rather than something that is mediatized. This article de:Standesherr (Deutscher Bund) links back to mediatization. Autonomous lordship maybe? If the English term cannot be determined, I would use either the German or the Polish form, which ever appears more in English literature. Charles 20:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Would you please do something to restrain your compatriots? In their zeal to prevent this purely historical article from mentioning its title, they have now three times introduced statements which will (to any English-speaker who is simply trying to read the article) outright falsehood. This is difficult enough to explain without this sort of thing.
If necessary, I will simply tag the article as inaccurate; but if I do, I shall also pursue other modes of dispute resolution, which they are likely to find less agreeable. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please have a word with Poeticbent; I have listed his blankings there and on his talk page. He has removed all the information which suggested that a German-speaker (or indeed an anglophone) ever had anything to do with Pless; I suppose I should admire the skill with which he has done so while leaving only one major falsehood; but he has, in the process, removed or falsified all the sourced material. I will attempt to archive, to leave room so you can explain to me why I should not treat this as academic and intellectual fraud. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 01:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I will have to go off line for some time; for one thing, I've enjoyed just about enough of this. I will let you know when I see something, but you may get quicker results by watching my Talk page for a while. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Odd. I archived more than half the sections, but it doesn't seem to have helped. Maybe I should unsub from Signpost. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I will have to go off line for some time; for one thing, I've enjoyed just about enough of this. I will let you know when I see something, but you may get quicker results by watching my Talk page for a while. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please read my reply at User talk:Pmanderson or a copy at Talk:Duchy of Pless. Thanks. --Poeticbent talk 06:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- They are substantially identical and substantially false; I have responded at Talk:Duchy of Pless. They are largely claims of WP:COPYVIO, which is a personal attack. I expect a retraction. I shall be filing a Request for Mediation; I will not be naming you as a party, but you are welcome to join. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have filed Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Duchy of Pless. If you want to take part, please remember both to add yourself as a party and to sign agreement to Mediation. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- They are substantially identical and substantially false; I have responded at Talk:Duchy of Pless. They are largely claims of WP:COPYVIO, which is a personal attack. I expect a retraction. I shall be filing a Request for Mediation; I will not be naming you as a party, but you are welcome to join. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Please consider doing an edit yourself; I am not enamoured of my wording, but I would like to see the facts back. At that point, I can continue researching the Hochbergs, seeing when they became Princes, and if the German Wikipedia is right they became Dukes in the Prussian peerage in 1905. (The facts should be clear enough from my edit, and PB has substantially quoted one of my sources.) Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks; I've commented on talk. I am tempted to obey Piotrus' Principle and put that explanation directly into text, but your edit summary deserved discussion. Do we want to split the article? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I've left a note to Molobo trying to explain what I actually want. Could you remind him that some users are genuinely neutral, and trying to write articles about the facts in comprehensible English? We Andersons are neither German nor Polish.
And could you disabuse him of the notion that "claims" is neutral?
I am tempted to write an RFC strictly on the question of whether rewriting an article in order to remove the article title is advisable. Would you be willing to endorse this?
I really don't want to go further; sanctions against unreasonable Poles will only encourage unreasonable Germans. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You may wish to do another revision. This edit, in which Poeticbent introduces another, entirely redundant paragraph on Germanization, and this edit, with its entirely frivolous tag, come close to persuading me to pursue dispute resolution on conduct; it is only your assurance that Poeticbent has been a useful editor which keeps me from doing so. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you unite the two paragraphs about Germanization, and deal with Molobo's hysterical tag about a book he has not read? If it is still there in 24 hours, I will take further steps. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks; you have behaved as I would expect of a Polish nobleman. I'm sorry not to be able to support you over Casimir; but I hope you will not consider the question one of much importance. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
З новим старим роком
Happy new (old) year (for old calendar people)
Сію, вію, посіваю, з Новим роком поздоровляю! I sow, I sow, I sow around you, with the New Year I send you health
На щастя, на здоров'я та на Новий рік, For good luck, for good health in the New Year
Щоб уродило краще, ніж торік, - So that everything would bring a better harvest than that year
Жито, пшениця і всяка пашниця, Rye, wheat and other grains
Коноплі під стелю на велику куделю. Hemp up to your ceiling in a huge pot
Будьте здорові з Новим роком та з Василем! Be healthy with the New Year and with the feats of St Basils
Дай, Боже!
God give you!
Bandurist (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Merging BattleTech clans
In this edit, your edit summary says to "see talk", but you didn't leave a message there. If you disagree with the merge, you should say so on the talk page and leave the tags so that others can weigh in. Shutting down potential discussion by removing the tags is poor form. Please restore the tags so that we can discuss the merge. Pagrashtak 15:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- The first section is coming up on its two-year anniversary. Wikipedia's attitudes regarding in-universe content have change since then, and I believe you're aware of that. I'm not sure how the last section is applicable. You're asking for editors to not create new clan pages, which I agree with. Are you directing me to that section because of the list of clans you wrote there? Clan Mongoose is on that list, but you just completed that merge, so I don't know why that should preclude other merges. In any event, that last section is a statement and not a discussion. I'll ask you again to restore the tags and let the merge discussion take place. Pagrashtak 18:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Meaning Talk:BattleTech? The only comment besides yours under the Clans section says "Let's keep the 4 major clans and merge the rest of them". I don't know which four are the major ones, but we have more than four clan articles, so it appears there is some support for at least some of the merges. I don't agree that the clans are are notable as Harry Potter. Pagrashtak 18:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Piotrusbot
Is User:Piotrusbot your account or not? I was going to block it, but I thought I'd ask first. Thanks. Acalamari 21:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- That's fine then: I saw the name come up in the new user log, and thought I'd ask. I've welcomed some of the accounts created to do with the class. Good luck with your teaching then. :) Acalamari 22:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea. If you need anything, let me know, and I'll see if I can help out or not. Good luck with the project, and with the images. :) Acalamari 22:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Have a read and chack the style. Thanks Bandurist (talk) 03:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Stanislaw lem his master voice francisco alves editora rio de janeiro 1991.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stanislaw lem his master voice francisco alves editora rio de janeiro 1991.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 07:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
One of our future topics (February 11th) is about writing an article from scratch. Since you have a very respectable ammount of DYKs, i was wondering if you could write said article? The Placebo Effect (talk) 16:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, do what you think wil create a good article. Just be sure to link to it at the above page. The Placebo Effect (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia:WikiProject European history
Welcome and thanks for joining/clarifying your active status in the Polish history task force. As you probably have noticed, we are undergoing a reorganization after a substantial period of inactivity and a loss of membership followed by renewed interest and the organization of Wikipedia:WikiProject History. As you are aware, we have recently merged the even less active Polish History Project into Wikipedia:WikiProject European history/Polish history task force, I notice several new members of the project with that area of interest, I've already suggested to them that they also join the task force, but you might encourage them as well if you have an interest in getting that going. As you probably noticed, I've suggested that editors discuss any ideas you have at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European history rather than at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European history/Polish history task force - but please, when you think there are enough active members of the task force to justify it acting more or less independently, remove that message and start discussing Polish history there. Please though, contribute any ideas you have about the overall organization of the project and review our Strategy page if you get a chance. Thanks and again, Welcome.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 18:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
requests
Hey Piotrus, I have two requests: 1. Will you delete my wikipedia user page? and 2. Since you have before given me articles to write, if you ever think of any other ones that you think I would like to start, please add them here and I will begin trying to write them (sorry I still haven't gotten to Stefan Fedak). Thanks, Ostap 18:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- No not leaving only frustrated. I just plan to start only writing articles. Ostap 19:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I am just amazed that some POV's still exist. I wan't to avoid disputes. I see you writing articles all the time, that's seems more productive. Ostap 19:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. Ostap 22:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I am just amazed that some POV's still exist. I wan't to avoid disputes. I see you writing articles all the time, that's seems more productive. Ostap 19:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Honor Harrington & a funny coincidince
Two things. 1. Can you send me the Honorverse Image that you posted? my e-mail is crazy_toadz@hotmail.com
2. Your the 7th polish person I saw today. And im not even polish related. Its weard.
Jinque ,from J-C The Heavy Sci-Fi Reader —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.214.45 (talk) 01:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Which HHverse image? Few years ago I had an entire gallery :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Request for mediation accepted
|
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Duchy of Pless.
|
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
Congratulations on the article's promotion—and on your patience in the face of endless carping and sniping by some of the most incorrigible narcissists and blowhards on the Wikipedia! Nihil novi (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Your feedback and insight into this talk would be highly appreciated. Pundit|utter 16:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have already posted to this project, however I would value your opinion as of a person involved in history disputes, as well as engaged in Eastern Europe articles, and finally as of an administrator (the other editor expressed his interest in having an admin's comment as well). Pundit|utter 18:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
|
The Czech Barnstar of National Merit | |
| I award you with our highest star for continuous help to our project, kindness, fairness, and for good work. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 18:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC) |
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Polish army in Wilno 1919.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Polish army in Wilno 1919.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Jodl denazification
Hi Piotrus. Could you please check this Polish paper and confirm if the records in the landesarkiv confirm that Jodl was aquited in 1953? (It's at the end) Please respond here Talk:Alfred_Jodl. Thanks. --Stor stark7 Talk 20:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I wonder whether you made a slip at the end of your interesting contribution to the discussion page on Jodl. When you wrote: 'That means that Jodl was finally not acquitted; the current version of the article is correct' did you in fact mean incorrect? The link leads to the Wikipedia article on Jodl, which has the story about rehabiliation. Norvo (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I believe Norvo has seriously misunderstood you, could you please on the articles talk page reconfirm the basic facts from the Polish University paper. Also, could you there please also comment on if it in any way differs from the text in the article, which currently is based on the detailed description of the event and its context in the German article from the shoah.de website?--Stor stark7 Talk 16:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Polish-Austrian War
|
|
On 22 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Polish-Austrian War, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 13:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Piotr, there's a discussion on monarch names going on at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles), a discussion which might interest you given your opinions and history with the Polish monarch articles. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm actually just heading out on wikibreak, so I won't be able to open any of those until I return. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 08:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, does the above request still need fulfilling ? Jackaranga (talk) 22:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Finished I hope. Jackaranga (talk) 02:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:MONIAC.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:MONIAC.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Liftarn (talk) 07:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Inwazja na Rosję (1812)
Hej Piotrus! Zastanawiam się czy nie zekować tego hasła, które nie wnosi absolutnie nic nowego do Wikipedii. To jest po prostu dubel. Czy możesz mnie przekonać, że jednak hasło powinno pozostać? Pozdrawiam serdecznie, odpowiedz na polskiej - Łeba —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.78.233.33 (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Polish culture during World War II
An editor has nominated Polish culture during World War II, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish culture during World War II and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Question
Any relation to historian Zdzisław Konieczny? Ostap 20:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- That is very interesting. Say, on the Armia Krajowa page you asked for a source for Ak involvement in the Pawłokoma massacre. I added a source which I believe says that this is the view held by the Polish National Remembrance Institute. Let me know what you think. Ostap 05:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Koniecpolski
Cześć Piotrus! Chciałem pogratulować Ci artykułu o Stanisławie Koniecpolskim. Zastanawiałem się czy korzystałeś przy pisaniu tego artykułu jeszcze z innej bibliografii niż ta zamieszczona w przypisach. Jeżeli tak to czy mógłbyś podrzucić jakieś tytuły na stronę mojej dyskusji w polskiej Wikipedii przy odrobinie wolnego czasu? Z góry dziękuje za odpowiedź i pozdrawiam. Adrian84 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.28.213.174 (talk) 20:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Dieter Senghaas
I wanted to let you know that I have just translated the article you requested from the German Wiki about Dieter Senghaas. (Not two minutes after I finished, someone tagged it with several requests for references, which I don't have, since it's a translation.) If you have any ideas for categories, that would be appreciated, too, since I don't like to do that task. Enjoy! Scbarry (talk) 01:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Polish Museum, Rapperswil
If you could use material for the DYK column, perhaps you would like to consider nominating my new article on the Polish Museum, Rapperswil. Nihil novi (talk) 10:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Congrats on FA for Józef Piłsudski!
Well perservered.--Kiyarrllston 22:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Same here. Sorry I never got round to responding to that last bunch of objections: I was going to, but it takes an awful lot of reading to do so, so I was gearing up to it. As you know, I did read some sources on the dictatorship government and found that section to be spot on apart from half a paragraph (my edit to that paragraph was not reverted by you, which shows your good faith, as always). I knew this article would make it in the end! Now, I expect you are wondering which highly controversial subject to bring to FA next! qp10qp (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Eastern Front
I spotted many of your contributions in the Second World War articles, but see you are quite busy with other articles. Can I call on your help when required for the Eastern Front revamp and expansion project I started?--mrg3105mrg3105 01:56, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/01/24/episode-40-wikipedias-genetic-makeup/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 05:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Happy Adminship
| Happy Adminship | from the Birthday Committee | |
|---|---|---|
  Wishing Piotrus/Archive 21 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! | ||
E.Wedel
|
|
On 25 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article E.Wedel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hunger Plan
|
|
On 25 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hunger Plan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 21:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Józef Haller de Hallenburg
|
|
On 26 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Józef Haller de Hallenburg, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 06:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 28 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Polish culture during World War II, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Bookworm857158367 (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
My Rfa
My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 05:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK hooks look great. You have a wicked sense for the absurd. I made a few wording adjustments and responded to the question about the Museum. I gather you think some inline references would help the Kasztanka article; I'll see what I can do. Frankly, I would have preferred to have devoted last night to something other than a horse, no matter how distinguished! Nihil novi (talk) 07:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've put in references for "Kasztanka."
- But now I've noticed an apparent problem with the "Museum" hook. I didn't understand at first what the reviewer meant about my Museum-website reference not specifically stating who closed the Museum in 1952 or why. I've quoted at DYK what was on that site before, and which has apparently been deleted by the Museum. The Museum may have done this to minimize potential irritants with the Swiss, since a Swiss group is now trying to get the Polish Museum evicted from Rapperswil Castle (which would be a terrific shame). Do you see a possible alternative hook? Perhaps the Museum's collections, after their repatriation in 1927, having been largely destroyed by the Germans in World War II? If you think that's a good idea, could you make the substitution, before they declare the January 24 nominations to be expired? Sorry to intrude on your time. Thanks. Nihil novi (talk) 09:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and submitted a "Museum" alternative version. Please let me know if you see a problem with it. Nihil novi (talk) 11:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 28 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Polish Museum, Rapperswil, which you nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Bookworm857158367 (talk) 14:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
re:Ukrainian Soviet war
I changed it to be less annoying. About the article, I apologize but its getting pretty late, however this gives me something to do tomorrow. I will start it then. See you around. Ostap 06:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- On second thought, the topic seems to already be covered here: Ukrainian War of Independence. Not sure what to do. Ostap 19:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- It has been started. Please help expand. Ostap 21:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I'll get at it tonight (hopefully).Nevermind, Bogdan's already started it. Ostap 23:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- It has been started. Please help expand. Ostap 21:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Apology
I owe you an apology. I was thinking of Casimir 'The Great'. I should have checked before jumping in as I did. I have amended my comments. David Lauder (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
District of Warsaw (of Armia Krajowa)
Hi Piotruś
Thank you. The point is there existed two 'Warsaw districts' of AK:
(1) the larger one, until beginning 1942 "District of Warsaw - Voivodship" then "Area of Warsaw" it covered ca pre-war Voivodeship of Warsaw excluding Warsaw itself and its suburbs (the Powiat of Warsaw), and
(2) the smaller one, called also "District of Warsaw - City" included the Powiat of Warsaw including Warsaw within administrative borders.
Forms of names show variations, there were also codenames in use. In the table Armia_Krajowa#Structure_and_membership the (1) is specified on the top as "Warsaw Area", the (2) below under "independent areas" - "Warsaw".
The duality is confusing, I was also confused.
Best Regards Jacek
--Kucharski jacek (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Angielska wikipedia nie wyświetla obrazu
Drogi Piotrze
W Sub-district VI of Praga (of Armia Krajowa) angielska wikipedia nie chce wyświetlić obrazu, tego który jest w polskiej wersji tego artykułu Obwód VI Praga. Naszarpałem się i nie umiem. Proszę o pomoc, mistrzu.
Jacek--Kucharski jacek (talk) 12:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Władysław Biały
Witaj
Podstawowym źródłem do dziejów Władysława Białego pozostaje Janko z Czarnkowa, który rozdziale 45 pisze: Tegoż roku (1379) ... Ludwik wypłacił ... w mieście Gdańsku, dnia 20 października, księciu Władysławowi Białemu resztę pieniędzy, które za ziemie gniewkowską był winien ... Otrzymawszy je książę Biały pokwitowania czyli listów zeznawczych dać nie chciał, i udał się, ze szczupłym orszakiem do miasta Lubeki ... i tam pozostał. Co zamyśla dalej - nie wiadomo. Kronikarz nie wie więc nic o jego powrocie do Polski w latach późniejszych, kronikę pisał aż do 1384r. i o księciu wypowiada się wcale obficie.
O fakcie zaś starania się o koronę polską Janko z Czarnkowa nie informuje wprost choć pisze o przybyciu tam opozycji wielkopolskiej przeciwko rządom Andegawenów. W 1373r. Biały opanował zresztą nie tylko ojcowiznę ale i Gniezno, jakby rzeczywiście zamierzał obalić rządy Andegawenów w Polsce, tak zresztą interpretuje to literatura np. Sroka Stanisław, Piastowie. Leksykon Biograficzny, Kraków 1999, s. 247-248. Kandydatem do korony był więc przede wszystkim w 1373r.
Przejrzałem też Lelewela, pisze on tylko (jak jest w artykule na Wiki), że "udał się do papieża roku 1382, trzynastego września sekuralizacją. Mając te akta był okrzykiem przyjęty przez stronników swoich. Lecz za przybyciem Jadwigii ich liczba się zmiejszała a on sam musiał uchodzić. I dalej że tułał się po Niemczech.
Nie ma tam wprost, że przybył do Polski, a jeśli nawet uznać, że to Lelewel miał na myśli to źródła: Janko, czy Długosz nic o tym nie wspominają
Pozdrawiam 62.111.200.202 (talk) (Zuber) 06:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Biały c.d.
Władysław Biały pochodził z kujawskiej linii Piastów i jako taki był najbliższym krewnym po mieczu Kazimierza Wielkiego. Kiedy Ludwik Andegaweński został królem polski, początkowo oczy całej opozycji skupionej głównie w Wielkopolsce (działał tutaj m.in. kronikarz Janko z Czarnkowa), skierowała swoje zainteresowanie na wnuka Kazimierza Wielkiego - Kaźko. Ten jednak odmówił walki z Andegawenami. Wtedy naturalnym sojusznikiem opozycji stał się Władysław, któremu już jakiś czas temu sprzykrzył się żywot mnisi. Inna sprawa, że okazało się jak Biały przyjechał do kraju, to ta opozycja okazała się niezbyt liczna. Mimo to z zaskoczenia udało mu się odzyskać ojcowiznę, zajmując przy okazji pogranicze Wielkopolski i Kujaw.
Pozdrawiam 62.111.200.202 (talk) 11:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC) (Zuber)
Suggested AfD
Ravel article could be saved since it's well-known company in Poland, but I couldn't find proper sources for its notability or significance. There is no assertion of notability for these three companies, so I suggest to prod 'em or nominate for deletion. Visor (talk) 12:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Panie Piotrze, Znalazlem zdjecie Image:Sw krzyza po wojnie.jpg, ktore mnie zainteresowalo jako ze ostatnio dodawalem i organizowalem zdjecia Sylwestra Brauna w commons:category:Photos by Sylwester Braun. Podales zrodlo http://www.mhw.pl/_gAllery/89/895.jpg ale jak zes te zrodlo znalazl? Czy jest jakas strona z jego zdjeciami z 1945 roku? Zmieniajac pare numerow w URL mozna znalezc pare-set zdiec z muzeum ale nie moge znalezc ich opisow na http://www.mhw.pl. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 18:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
question about your name
I have noticed a number of people who seem to not want to refer to you by your username. Rather they take the time to spell out "Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus" or "Prokonsul Piotrus" and then link it to Piotrus. Is this what you want, or are these people just doing it for a different reason? Ostap 21:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I see. Writing out the whole thing seems like a waste of time. If you don't care, then I will still use only Piotrus. regards, Ostap 04:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for the talk page gift. It makes me feel so... wikipedi-ish :) Ostap 05:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 31 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kasztanka, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Bookworm857158367 (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Szablony
Template:Cachalot class submarine jest dublowany przez Template:V-boats
Template:Thresher/Permit class submarine jest dublowany przez Template:Permit class submarine
Te pierwsze trzeba by pousuwać, ale nie wiem czy do tego nie trzeba jakiegoś pozwolenia. PMG (talk) 13:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
W the P
I've had a go. Not my strength, but I did my best. I've added my draft under yours. qp10qp (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Extremist sources
Gee thanks! Looks like I have my work cut out for me ; ) --MPerel 05:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Polish
Please see the categories; they do not require citizenship. All the sources brought confirm that Gancwich was Polish, so the categories are proper. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Also, as I noted on the article talk page where all further discussion should take place, Category:Holocaust perpetrators is defined to refer to Nazis. Nazi Collaborators have there own categories. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 13:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of CINTAX
An editor has nominated CINTAX, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CINTAX and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi
a.jpg)
Hi Piotrus, over on Commons I've been collaborating with one of your compatriots. Do you know Jarekt? He's got some wonderful historic photos and did a wonderful scan of this image. Seems like the sort of thing that would interest you, so dropping a line. Best regards, DurovaCharge! 06:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
DYK hook
I don't know what to say. I think what you put is interesting. Ostap 20:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 3 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Władysław the White, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
|
On 3 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marian Gołębiewski (soldier), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Prus G.A. nomination
Masterpiece2000 has nominated "Bolesław Prus" for Good Article status, in the "Literature" section, and suggested that I inform you of this. Nihil novi (talk) 09:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
Did you know? was updated. On 3 February, 2008, a fact from the article Abraham Gancwajch, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Cheers, Daniel (talk) 11:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 3 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Group 13, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Archtransit (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
|
Issue XXIII (January 2008) | |
|
New featured articles:
New featured lists: New A-Class articles: |
| |
| |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
DYK!
|
|
On 4 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Multinational Division Central-South, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Congrats! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
People's concerns
See here. It looks like the purpose is content-generation, so I can't imagine that anybody will have problems; I think people were concerned that it was intended to be an extra-Wikipedian experiment in collaboration, or just a medium of communication between students (like a WebCT, or something), or something. There was an issue a couple of months ago where some Harvard law students injected themselves into Wikipedia dispute resolution as an experiment for class, and some people got their noses out of joint about that, so I think people are just sensitive about this sort of thing. Anyway, thanks for your response, and I hope this is the last you have to hear about this. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hungarian Comics
I'm happy you liked it! Thank you for recommending it for DYK. I'll leave the hook for you. I'm planing on illustrating the article, but it will take some time. :) Oh, as far as I know, there were some Hungarian comics published in Poland. I'll get you a list, if you're still interested in it. Zoli79 (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I'll try to clarify the topic and the other references in the following hours. Zoli79 (talk) 19:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I made that part of the article clearer, adding some new information and heavily packing it with references. I hope it's fine now. Oh, two things about the hook: these laws took effect before WWII and I would rather use the term "fascist", than "nazi" in this case.Zoli79 (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
DYK nomination
|
|
On 4 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ukrainian-Soviet War, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Congrats! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Drzewiecki etc
Dear Piotrus, Thanks for finding the Polish etc links for the above and for Michalowski. Can you please also do Jozef Turczynski for whom I recently wrote an article in English wp? I would not know how to start entering the correct letters into the polish wp... Thanks! Eebahgum (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thankyou, I had a look and couldn't find one, but to translate my own words in this language I'm afraid is far beyond me! Cheers, Eebahgum (talk) 21:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Piotr, I have added what references I have in my book re Żurawlew being the founder of the Competitions, but it is all from the one book. But I have also added a ext link to the Concourse official website, which attributes the fact to him as well [2]. Is there anything else you'd like me to detail? Best wishes, Eebahgum (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Strong POV
Please, "take care" of polonophobic user named "M0RD00R" - he keep adding to English Wikipedia sources based only on Jewish sites which include only one point of view and strong POV. M0RD00R is also highly aggresive in attacking Poland and Polish relative articles (look to his "talk" and "User contributions" pages). Please, do something.
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:M0RD00R
--Krzyzowiec (talk) 03:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Use of slaves by German state
[3] This article might provide additional information, it seems Wikipedia despite claims is lacking some essential articles.--Molobo (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Molobo
Trusting the fox to keep the henhouse again...? --Thorsten1 (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Fryderykchopinmusicacademywarsawmainlogo.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Fryderykchopinmusicacademywarsawmainlogo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/02/04/episode-41-setting-the-record-straight/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 23:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
DYK!
|
|
On 6 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leonard Skierski, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Congrats! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Klaus Mitffoch deletion debate
Piotrus, I thought you were an inclusionist :-) Jogers (talk) 09:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 7 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hungarian comics, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Archtransit (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
|
|
On 7 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aleksander Michałowski, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Archtransit (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your nom on Michałowski! Best wishes, Eebahgum (talk) 00:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
At least food for thought
I'm done... too late for anything more. At least I've honed off some burrs and smoothed a couple of rough edges.
As far as "enjoying it" goes, the snippet strikes me more as an idea to flesh out and hang a storyline on and not so much as a good story itself. Too many artifices of linqual pseudo-tech too quick sans a firm footing to figure where one stands in relation to the revelations. No personality, or quirky history to cause the reader to relate and emphasize with Winnie. Contrast with Heinlein's self-aware computer "Mike"/Mycroft/Michelle in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress... the difference, as Heinlein noted, is that good stories are about people, even one's made of crystals and whatevers. Thanks for the kudos, glad to lend a different perspective and a hand. // FrankB 05:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ping rejoiner! // FrankB 02:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Redirect of Dr Beata Cybulska
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dr Beata Cybulska, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dr Beata Cybulska is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dr Beata Cybulska, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Stats query
Hi Piotr, i have a query which I thought you might be able to help with as I've noticed your interest in wikistats. There are of the order of 500,000 bio pages on en.wikipedia (counting categories by birth & death, or as on the biography wikiproject page). Do you have any idea how many pages there are for locations (towns, etc.)? Best Dsp13 (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Katyn
The Russians didn´t do it??? See: Romuald Swiatek--85.180.5.130 (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
request
Could you take a look at this talk page? I think another user may be having trouble communicating in English. Thanks, Ostap 20:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Katyn Massacre
Hi, Piotrus. Could you please have a look at the note on my talk page concerning the above. I'm not quite sure what the issue is. Can you help? Clio the Muse (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
This arbitration case has closed and the final decision may be found at the link above. Giano is placed on civility restriction for one year. Should Giano make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, Giano may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling. All parties in this case are strongly cautioned to pursue disputes in a civil manner designed to contribute to resolution and to cause minimal disruption. All the involved editors, both the supporters and detractors of IRC, are asked to avoid edit warring on project space pages even if their status is unclear, and are instructed to use civil discussion to resolve all issues with respect to the "admin" IRC channel. For the Arbitration committee, Thatcher 04:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Irpen a member of the Working group on ethnic and cultural edit wars
Checkout Wikipedia:Working_group_on_ethnic_and_cultural_edit_wars Martintg (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
What_is_this_122_473lo.jpg
img243.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=40219_What_is_this_122_473lo.jpg
This might work Template:PD-PolishGov
You got screwed by the copyvio people. If you're not being watched (some have been) this should work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.42.168.246 (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Fryderyk Chopin Academy of Music in Warsaw
|
|
On 9 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fryderyk Chopin Academy of Music in Warsaw, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |